Sentences with phrase «of liberal ideology»

And so if, as Dr. Schake posits, «China remains the great test case of liberal ideology,» then liberal ideology is in serious trouble, for China's conservative «counter-reform,» to again quote from Prof. Minzner, is likely to be the new normal for the foreseeable future.

But these criticisms frequently stop short of getting at the heart of their work and what makes it so relevant to this era: the acute failure of a liberal ideology of equality and tolerance.

The entire cast strikes the right balance between representing boilerplate aspects of liberal ideology and embodying fully realized human beings.

From the extreme left who argue that the decline of Catholic faith and practice is due to the reactionary and intransigent leadership of an over centralised Roman bureaucracy, to the extreme right who argue that the same phenomenon is caused by the left wing leanings and excessive tolerance of the same bureaucracy in the face of a liberal ideology at variance with the true faith.

Modern Family and the Simpsons are the child of liberal ideology.

We nees to rethink our slavish devotion to some of these liberal ideologies especially around gender and sex politics.

I have a deep distrust of liberal ideologies.

Not exact matches

The result was a birth of a new economic ideology, the Obama ideology... or what I like to call, «Liberal Economic Elitism» (LEE).

The historical success of the PC Party in Alberta between 1971 and 2015 was not based on adherence to conservative ideology but on the ability of its leaders to build a big blue tent of conservative, moderate and liberal voters.

And Pol Pot's ideology contained a liberal dose of Buddhism.

It would be easy to take shelter in the categories determined by cultural and political ideologies: so - called conservative Catholics are expected to reject or downplay the urgency of environmental protection, and so - called liberal or progressive Catholics are expected to downplay marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

Thus liberal theology in Germany played a role in opening the door of the church to Nazi ideology.

A person can, no doubt, make an idol out of an ideology, but the mere possibility does not establish, as Koyzis seems to think, that Christian liberals, Christian conservatives, etc., have committed themselves to an essentially idolatrous project.

Long before there was a debate about same - sex anything, far too many people bought into a liberal ideology about sexuality that makes a mess of marriage: Cohabitation, no - fault divorce, extra-marital sex, non-marital childbearing, massive consumption of pornography and the hook - up culture all contributed to the breakdown of our marriage culture.

(Most of those who consider themselves above ideology are, in my experience, liberals who for one reason or another are reluctant to announce that fact to themselves.)

First, the Pope's ideology are the one of a Liberal, nothing new..

about people who experience same - sex attraction trying to live a Christian life, this fuller exposition of his thought on the new ideologies presented a fascinating look into the way in which colonialism — discredited by liberals and to lesser extent many conservatives as well — has gone away from the actual military and political rule seen in previous centuries, to a stealthier and subtler form of the exertion of foreign power.

What struck me, though, was the possibility that I have been missing something big: it is likely that many of those who denigrate religious beliefs aren't drawing just on secular, anti-Christian ideologies, but on liberal Christian ideas about God.

If the idea of prison abolition at first seems a bit impractical even to liberals, it becomes somewhat more plausible as the ideology is examined in juxtaposition with strategy and tactics.

He finds current expressions of both to be internally divisive as well as at odds with each other, usually based on a conservative / liberal split that weakens the effectiveness of both «civil religions,» and leaves the way open for secular ideologies including material success, radical individual freedom, and an amoral pragmatism.

With such major centers of the new evangelicalism as Fuller Seminary now showing a good deal more affinity to neo-orthodoxy than to fundamentalism (see Gerald T. Sheppard, «Biblical Hermeneutics: The Academic Language of Evangelical Identity,» Union Seminary Quarterly Review 32 [Winter 1977, pp. 81 - 94]-RRB-, surely we must be cautious both about assuming flatly a «decline» of classic liberalism and about implying a one - to - one relation between the liberal ideologies, whatever their current condition, and the oldline denominational structures.

A start at combating the gays and liberal left in their efforts to boycott and destroy a business because of ideology.

It was inevitable, perhaps, that the «culture wars» — the debate that continues to rage over the impact of political correctness, multiculturalism, and their allied ideologies — would spawn a genre of liberal apologetics designed to exonerate liberalism itself from its role in abetting the establishment of radical doctrine as a mandatory standard of judgment in mainstream cultural life.

One could point as further evidence to the manifest «religious» characteristics of the two dominant contemporary secular ideologies: communism and liberal, democratic capitalism.

The modem West's two important ideologies, those of liberal progress and Marxist revolution, both reflect and depend upon these assumptions about time.

But then, we don't want to go there, cause then we get right back into liberal haters of bush ideology and obama haters of his ideology.

Part of this is ideology, of course, since affluent white liberals are the most extreme segment of the Democratic coalition.

The unipolarist ideology by whatever name, adds a fourth party to the foreign - policy debate, which has otherwise involved 1) liberal internationalists, who seek world peace and stability by securing collective agreements from nation states to comply with international law; 2) realists, who seek to ensure a balance of power among competing regimes; and 3) principled anti-interventionists, who renounce the use of military force for all reasons besides self - defense.

But the true scandal, as Caldwell shows, is that political elites» ideology of deregulation — moral and economic, liberal and conservative — is responsible for creating, disguising, and prolonging the carnage.

Liberals in the saddle can indulge in abstract disputes about the nature of the ideology that legitimizes their rule.

Social liberal ideology is like Gnosticism in its reliance (which is usually implicit) on one form or another of person - body (or self - body) dualism; but dualism is only one feature of Gnosticism (albeit a very important one).

If Marxism and secular ideologies of liberal democracy were turning points, the collapse of socialism in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe has been historic too.

Believe it or not but Jesus, by the current ideology of the TEA Party, would be considered a «liberal» today and castigated as a lazy, homeless bum by the GOP (I am not saying this to be mean, think deep about this and you will see the truth of this statement.

Of course the radicals who despised Yale's liberal intellectualism saw that sop to their ideology as encouragement to step up the pressure, and conservatives wrote off Brewster as an appeaser not worth defending.

@Patrick Williams «Believe it or not but Jesus, by the current ideology of the TEA Party, would be considered a «liberal» today and castigated as a lazy, homeless bum by the GOP (I am not saying this to be mean, think deep about this and you will see the truth of this statement.

The West wants a philosophy of authentic freedom, even as its liberal ideology pushes it away.

In an unexpected way, the metaphysical materialism that characterized Marxism has re-emerged after its collapse in a new form, as the ideology of the leadership class in liberal culture.

Modern reformation movements in traditional Indian religions especially the movements of Neo-Hinduism indicated the impact of modernity on Indian life at its religious level, and India's liberal democratic and leftist ideologies guiding the struggle for political independence and nation - building in independent India, indicate the assimilation of Enlightenment humanism at the ideological level, though qualified a great deal by the reformed religious view of Gandhism.

And if the Indian Constitution begins with affirming the humanist principles of liberty, equality, fraternity and justice it has behind it the impact of liberal and socialist secular ideologies as well as Renascent Hinduism from Raja Rammohan Roy to Gandhi who absorbed these values and made them part of the Renascent Hinduism itself.

Perhaps it may be right to say, that in general the politically conscious educated middle class of India were guided more by the Liberal and Marxian ideologies than the Gandhian or other versions of reformed Hindu thought.

It is ironical that neo-orthodoxy, born as a radical protest against liberal conformism, became one of the fashionable ideologies for the Eisenhower period in American intellectual life — that time when men sagely advised us that the real battle was not bohemia or radical politics or ideology, but the mystery of the inner life.

Ideology and presuppositions can not help but come into play, hence the labeling of liberal / conservative.

Only thus can one understand the triumph of Fascism, which never gained what Gramsci called ideological hegemony — indeed, which never had an ideology at anything like the level of articulation and sophistication of the Catholics, liberals, or socialists.

So now we have a liberal assault on an ideology that sees beyond the lust and shallow moral superiority of a self proclaimed elite.

More generally, the Labour Party has has always been a coalition of different ideologies and interests, and has never been a wholly liberal party, but it has often been an important advocate and vehicle of social liberalism.

Where once we had a great battle of ideologies in public life, between the socialist left and the capitalist right, between authoritarians and liberals, now we have only the coffee house gossip of whether Keith Vaz will get a knighthood for his vote on 42 days and the identities of the «thirty women» Nick Clegg says he has slept with.

Should I be concerned of somebody using my name to represent nutty liberal ideology??

As to your question, the American Conservative can justify the Revolutionary war by means of support of classical Liberal Ideology, under which, a government derives power from the consent of the govern.

Now, beyond the inevitable conflict between liberal and conservative ideologies, tensions have emerged within the conservative base that reveal the «separateness and irreducibility of the standing concerns that make up our orientation toward distinct values and commitments.»

Labour needs to remember that while Liberal Democracy is an incoherent mish - mash of conflicting ideologies, political expediency and personal ambition, they're a very different mish - mash to ours.