Many seminaries are open at least to
some of the liberationist modes of postmodern theology.
The joint political and social ventures
of the liberationist and socialist groups established an enduring link between the two.
But what
of the liberationist, the democratic socialist and the other progressives who perceive King's accomplishments as small compared to their own achievements, and negligible in the light of America's need?
Without realizing what he is doing — or realizing but choosing not to acknowledge it — his critique
of the liberationist project recapitulates one of the great critiques of the ages, Edmund Burke's writings on the French Revolution.
The flaws in Walzer's analysis
of the liberationist project stem from his inclination to see religious and conservative countermovements as problems to be solved rather than as expressions of genuine and worthy human aspirations.
It is a veritable catalogue
of liberationist cliches.
Any criticism
of the liberationist program is perilous, for it can quickly put the critic in the uncomfortable position of seeming to favor the oppressor.
These communities are both the context of theological reflection and microcosms
of the liberationists» vision for Latin America.
This not only exaggerates the influence
of the liberationists on Latin American economic policy, it obscures the impact of five centuries of colonial / imperial domination....
Sigmund, who is strongly critical
of liberationists» rejections of capitalism, also takes Novak to task for trusting to «the magic of the market» and for being «no more willing to engage in criticism of capitalism than liberation theologians are of socialism.»
I submit that their concern is not so much with the conservatives» possible manipulation of King's dream as with the difficulties that dream creates for the aspirations
of the liberationists, democratic socialists and progressives.
One
of the liberationists, Hugo Assmann, admitted this shortcoming, calling for a «transition to democracy»» a movement beyond face - to - face democracy to the public and formal democracy of parties and institutions.
Jesus in Global Contexts by Priscilla Pope - Levison and John R. Levison Westminster / John Knox Press, 232 pages, $ 17.99 A husband and wife team offers a once - over-lightly survey
of liberationists, feminists, and others who «do Christology» by construing Jesus according to cultural context.
Not exact matches
And
of course Marxian analysis took on renewed life» if, most often, in crudely vulgar forms» in the various
liberationist struggles
of the 1960s and 1970s, most notably in the anti-Vietnam War movement.
Even Sullivan's chapter on «The
Liberationists» does not include those we have come to associate with that term (the strident gay - rights activists or flamboyant gay liberationists) but focuses instead on a ragtag group of theoreticians influenced by Fren
Liberationists» does not include those we have come to associate with that term (the strident gay - rights activists or flamboyant gay
liberationists) but focuses instead on a ragtag group of theoreticians influenced by Fren
liberationists) but focuses instead on a ragtag group
of theoreticians influenced by French philosophy.
The argument was made according to a classic
liberationist reading
of the scriptural mandate.
The
liberationist would see the church's vocation as one
of delivering people from the contexts that foster crime and drug use.
Thus
liberationist spokespeople are left to issue prophetic calls necessarily devoid
of the practical guidelines their commitment to political change would entail.
Nothing could be said, for within a
liberationist understanding
of God's will there is little room for considering how, short
of overturning society at large, Christians should respond to particular social problems.
In fact, a
liberationist outlook obscures rather than clarifies the practical imperatives
of Christian ministry within the U.S.
Articles and teaching sessions are devoted to social scandals like the increase in hunger, poverty, homelessness and illiteracy in the U.S. Likewise, issues surrounding U.S. foreign policy, aid and grotesque military appropriations are frequently critiqued on behalf
of a foreseen new social order that will be founded on
liberationist principles.
It will learn something from what
liberationists, women, and others have said, but it will incorporate only what can be assimilated into the mainstream
of a relatively unchanged tradition.
Indeed, the animal rights movement's fury against the speciesist use
of animals» a necessary element for human flourishing, particularly in medical research» has increased to the point that scientists are now under threat
of death by the most radical
liberationists for daring to experiment on rats or monkeys to find cures for cancer and other human afflictions.
Along the way, she counters the restricted rationalism
of analytic philosophy and the utopianism
of sundry
liberationist proposals for «fixing» the world.
First, as the title
of a key chapter puts it, the American example shows that religion can «Make Use
of Democratic Instincts» in a manner mutually beneficial to itself and democracy; second, sustainable democracy needs religion, which means we can expect democratic peoples to remain attached to its continuance or at least potentially receptive to its revival (cf. II, 2.17, # s 17 - 20); third, democratic times, because they are enlightened times, tend to be ones
of increasing doubts about religion; fourth, the relevant religion for America and Europe, Christianity, will be tugged against and perhaps eroded by powerful and ongoing democratic currents toward
liberationist and materialist mores; and fifth, religion's authority in democratic society will always rest upon common opinion.
The potential leadership
of at least the persuaders among the Christian R&D professionals is problematic, considering the weight
of empirical evidence accumulated against
liberationist diagnoses and prescriptions for the Third World's woes.
Any radically monotheistic understanding
of the reality
of God (whether classical, process,
liberationist or liberal) affirms the strict universality
of the divine reality.
Overall, the entire field
of Christian social ethics —
liberationist or not — pays scandalously little attention to empirical data and social science, as when Karen Lebacqz cites the Hite Report as though it were a statistically representative sample
of sexual attitudes and behaviors, or when Michael Novak draws simplistic comparisons between Japanese and Latin American political economies.
Through these criticisms, Troeltsch can provide us with a needed sense
of perspective on the
liberationist project.
Liberationists initially took it as just one more instance
of comfortable members
of the white male establishment indulging their intellectual interests in a profoundly oppressive world.
The willful blindness Eberstadt condemns in
liberationists and Marxist professors, therefore, is not so bad as that
of the pro-life journals.
It's extremely likely that the only significant, ongoing dissent to sexual
liberationist orthodoxy will come from religious people and the institutions they run for the sake
of living out their faith.»
These are churches gathered around issues
of common concern; the project is reminiscent
of the house - church emphasis, but it is done from a
liberationist perspective.
I was a leftist, a liberal, a
liberationist, yet here was a story that portrayed liberalism, in the form
of the Harvard professor Henry Rutledge, as moral disorder, and leftist liberationism, in the professor's students — one a black activist, one a Jesuit — as a posturing sham.
The
liberationist hermeneutic draws upon Scripture to support the current struggle
of the dispossessed for justice and liberty.
A
liberationist approach to eschatology includes the empowerment
of oppressed persons to take charge
of their own lives.
Such
liberationist collaboration is already beginning to emerge among the various types
of liberation theologies.
But to recognize that precursor would have posed an awkward question for Walzer: Are the
liberationist project's flaws merely a matter
of means and attitude, or are they also rooted in its conception
of human nature, its principles, and its goals?
There is a mounting insistence among women (including many who reject the methods
of militant
liberationists) that they be treated as full human beings, with freedom to choose and to develop their personal gifts and abilities.
Presumably he means by this that it is for the Greens to think through the relation
of the contributions
of deep ecology to those
of social, political, and economic analysis, feminists, and
liberationists.
Would you not concede to the thesis that effective
liberationist impulses, as different from those which sought to mitigate the plight
of the poverty - stricken and outcastes were stirred and given an institutional framework by Marxist movement especially in Kerala which has the largest Christian population in the country?
Christ opening himself up to the «least
of these» and identifying with them was, for many
liberationists, the act
of self - sacrifice that fulfilled the historical Jesus's indwelling by God the Father.
It should be pointed out, though, that nothing in the social - constructivist position legitimates the denial
of rights... Assertive gay
liberationists have argued that it may be strategically wiser to concede the possibility that a few students might be influenced to become gay by having an openly gay teacher as a role model, and to say, «So what?»
14 /
Liberationists might see a dictatorship as very much
of the Devil — and so separate themselves radically.
Instead
of being guided only by the needs
of a particular oppressed group a
liberationist may seek to help the church as a whole find the appropriate response to the recognition
of its role in that oppression.
Among them are liberal and conservative Roman Catholics, some Southern Baptists, some evangelicals, some Presbyterians, some Mennonites, some Calvinists, some Episcopalians, some Lutherans (not many), some from the Church
of the Servant King (Gardenia, California), some liberal Protestants, some feminists and some
liberationists.
If the
liberationist «analysis»
of poverty and oppression in Latin America can no longer be credited, what political hope for the future has been bequeathed to the poor by liberation theology?
The Reformation and Liberation Theology: Insights for the Challenge
of Today by Richard Shaull Westminster, 144 pages, $ 11.95 A veteran
liberationist of Princeton Theological Seminary contends that the sundry Protestant reformations demand and make possible a radically new social order.
By all reports, pessimism and near - despair grip
liberationists today, who see on the horizon very little indeed that offers hope
of a better life to the poor
of Latin America.
That is, he set a course that would not compromise democracy for the sake
of socialism — a position that set him apart from assorted domestic political sectarians and especially from the Marxist - Leninist establishments and ideological
Liberationists who, until recently, commanded the rhetoric as well as the policies in Eastern Europe and the Third World.