Sentences with phrase «of life argument»

One might take Jeremiah's words to mean that he was in favor of the quality of life argument.
If suffering is probable, says the quality of life argument, it is more merciful and just in some instances to terminate life rather than let it continue.
Another ex-minister said: «We're using the cost of living argument as a substitute for economic competence.

Not exact matches

That's not to say Fraser - Jenkins is opposed to bucking conventional thought — he readily acknowledges the importance of such behavior throughout history and says research - driven arguments have helped shape the world we live in today.
A common problem working couples have is not being able to leave their personal life at home, which can lead to continuations of arguments in the office.
As Eddie Nuvakhov, CEO and producer of LNC Productions, a company that specializes in marketing videos explains, «You need to show people how your product is going to change their lives for the better, and not just what the product is, if you want to make a convincing argument for its purchase.
Before this starts to sound like the annual lecture from management — perhaps you're one of those corporate employees forced to sleepwalk through an intranet quiz once in a while to prove to your higher - ups that you're familiar with the company's code of conduct — consider DeMars's argument for the value of the ethical office from a personal standpoint: «In order to live happily and at peace with ourselves, we have to live in ways that are congruent with our morals,» she argues.
While shouting over the opinions of others may be a way to drive ratings, success in business or in life requires you to take a moment, consider why you might be wrong, and build your own argument with the counterargument in mind.
Critics of the toys to life movement have made arguments that the industry is bound to slow down because of the need for constant purchase, but the move towards customizable options provides a cost effective solution for both toy makers and parents.
So in 2011, he began filming the show with Channel 4, a «fly - on - the - wall drama» following the love lives, arguments and parties of his friends who were (and still are) constantly visiting London's best restaurants, bars, shops and club openings.
Taleb's contemporary classic is enjoying something of a renaissance after Brexit and Donald Trump's victory in the U.S. presidential election, with its argument that humanity rarely sees the truly life - altering shifts coming.
I'm not sure why you suggest that those of us who doubt your arguments live in a world where governments somehow don't need taxes.
In spite of this data, you could make an argument for people holding more stocks in their portfolios for the simple fact that people are living longer than ever, so maybe they need more stocks to grow their money in retirement:
Heather Dietrick, Gawker's president and general counsel, presented a more hopeful view of the case to Capital, and suggested that the Florida jury would be moved by their argument that Hogan had turned his own sex life into a public spectacle long before Gawker published this tape.
Vitalik finishes his live - tweeting session by highlighting that each side of this nasty argument want to enhance.
«To succeed in the Gig Economy, we need to create a financially flexible life of lower fixed costs, higher savings, and much less debt,» Diane Mulcahy, a senior analyst at the Kauffman Foundation and a lecturer at Babson College, writes in her book «The Gig Economy,» which is part economic argument and part how - to guide.
The Lightning Network is now live removing one of the big negative arguments about Bitcoin: lethargic speeds.
The argument asking weather Islam is or can be a tolerant religion where people of this faith can live side by side with Christians, Jews, Hindu's and other religions co-exist in America is on the minds of most Americans.
2) I don't know where you got this idea of life not being capable of symmetry, I've never heard such an argument, what is this based on?
Uhlmann of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C., has put together a remarkable range of information and arguments bearing on continuing debates about the end, and ending, of life.
and youre using what you know of for THIS life here on earth... your arguments don't work... they are wrong arguments..
... well the same logic applys to god... i enjoy dropping these logic bombs on people and see how they react and hope that maybe that logic bomb will eventually set up a chain reaction in their consciousness... or maybe I am an egotistical f c k who just likes to have an unassaiable argument which with to beat others over the head with... maybe I am wrong to do so because the Human Condition is so cold and bleak in its finality that people need the cushion of god to go on with their everyday lives.
Kaine started out with a version of the «personally opposed but publically supporting» argument based on the specious claim that the First Amendment of the Constitution prevents us from imposing our religious «values» on public life.
Unfortunately, humans seem to forget this fact when we find ourselves turning to nature to guide us through difficult choices, such as arguments about whether life begins at conception, or over the proper structure of the family.
rea · son — noun / ˈrēzən / a.Think, understand, and form judgments by a process of logic — humans do not reason entirely from facts b.Find an answer to a problem by considering various possible solutions c.Persuade (someone) with rational argument — I tried to reason with her, but without success» I accept nothing on faith» can you prove we evolved from primates or that life started by random chance?
You said, «To discount The Bible as merely a «fairy tale», or deny the life of Jesus just doesn't cut it without ANY counter-evidence, so you make the convenient argument for yourself that there is no evidence to counter.
I am convinced that the question of justice constitutes the essential argument, or in any case the strongest argument, in favor of faith in eternal life.
If examining rational arguments, perceiving God in transcendent experience, and delving deeply into difficult questions are what drew me closer to Christ, seeing Christ work in the lives of actual Christians is what opened my heart to Him in the first place, allowing me to see how He had been working in my own life all along, even when I had refused to seek Him.
None of these arguments give the Israelis the right to continuously violate the basic human rights of the Palestinian people who live in abject poverty.
their is no way im going to be able to when an argument with some one determined on living a life of servitude so i just call you what you are a blind obedient slave.
• Wesley Smith says yes, Ross Blackburn says no, to the question of whether one can use secular arguments to defend human dignity, arguing in the pages of the Human Life Review, the always interesting and ever - useful quarterly edited by our good friend Maria McFadden Maffucci.
But, please note that the majority of Jews living here are not from Israel they are Europeans, or Americans, even by your own standards your argument is unsound.
like former leader... we too have kept open house and had people live with us long and short term for nearly all our married life... we've had debate, argument, sadness, hilarity... even had someone with a disturbing psychosis... not at one stage have we felt the need to make any rules... that would almost be like copping out of relationship.
Another line of argument might focus on the goods of human flourishing at stake in contraception and IVF and how only a sexual act open to life protects those goods.
Opponents of Catholic moral teaching, whether inside or outside the Church, seldom give actual arguments; more often, they demonize the «harsh,» «obsessive,» «judgmental» Catholic who emphasizes dogma and wants to tell others how to live their lives.
Say for example a patient in a remote location must undergo surgery without anesthesia, but with (for the sake of argument) the assurance that he will prevent his own death by undergoing great pains and also assuming that (for the sake of argument) he values his own life over and above any pain he may experience in this life.
Regarding Meyer's 2013 Darwin's Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design, paleontologist Donald Prothero asserts that Meyer, not a paleontologist nor a molecular biologist, does not understand these scientific disciplines, therefore he misinterprets, distorts and confuses the data, all for the purpose of promoting the «God of the gaps» argument.
By my reading of both the human condition and our current culture, a project like Hart's is more important to the status of religion in public life than, say, arguments for a natural law.
The Catholic Church, to take one prominent institution devoted to the defense of human life from conception until natural death, makes no «theological» argument about the nature of the life in the womb.
The narration of these events is meant to serve not just as an example but as an implicit argument for how Christians should think, and how seminary curriculum should be restructured to take congregational life seriously.
The argument gains a good deal of persuasiveness from the sharp contrast in religiosity between that period and the «50s, when liberal and moderate Protestants were not only happily a part of the American way of life but enjoyed a growth curve comparable to that of conservative Protestants.
Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative, as well as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.As a believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my atheist friends, and like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against whatever my atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.
There is, I think, no philosophically viable substitute for the tedious, painstaking, and unending analysis and argument which, properly, most people avoid in favor of the rich directness of normal human life.
All we've ever seen in history are the insecure and afraid; people who could not bear to live in the tension of unresolved arguments.
I have observed that the right - side arguments (the Bible is a book of Priorities) has yielded life, community, honesty, and exceptional diversity of worship and life - styles... and this works among the normally disciplined, those that have an artistic mindset, and among those that trust God to change others.
Some argument of this type must be successful if Hartshorne is to live up to the demands of his own conception of metaphysics and its method of falsification.
An ordinary reader might think that Martin's argument for openness to supernaturalism is intended to give aid to conservative Christians who reject secular scholarship because, they argue, the believing historian is just as justified in bringing her faith in supernatural intervention to life - of - Jesus research as the secular historian is in rejecting it.
Holiness for me was found in the mess and labour of giving birth, in birthday parties and community pools, in the battling sweetness of breastfeeding, in the repetition of cleaning, in the step of faith it took to go back to church again, in the hours of chatting that have to precede the real heart - to - heart talks, in the yelling at my kids sometimes, in the crying in restaurants with broken hearted friends, in the uncomfortable silences at our bible study when we're all weighing whether or not to say what we really think, in the arguments inherent to staying in love with each other, in the unwelcome number on the scale, in the sounding out of vowels during bedtime book reading, in the dust and stink and heat of a tent city in Port au Prince, in the beauty of a soccer game in the Haitian dust, in the listening to someone else's story, in the telling of my own brokenness, in the repentance, in the secret telling and the secret keeping, in the suffering and the mourning, in the late nights tending sick babies, in confronting fears, in the all of a life.
Arguments about no proof of any spiritual matters are another story entirely and for the life of me I don't know why the valid arguments are ignored over the invaArguments about no proof of any spiritual matters are another story entirely and for the life of me I don't know why the valid arguments are ignored over the invaarguments are ignored over the invalid ones.
For all our differences and ongoing arguments, to be an evangelical means we live in this tradition of interpretation.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z