When I get the chance to quiz someone who seems disproportionately passionate about the snobbishness
of literary critics or the rabble's appetite for trash, there's usually some highly charged personal history behind their indignation.
But the form critic utilizes the work
of literary critics, for example, in the inspired work of the father of form criticism, Hermann Gunkel, in the early decades of this century, and G. von Rad now in the middle decades.6 Only relatively few, notably among Scandinavian scholars, have completely abandoned the presuppositions of literary criticism.
As regular readers know, Girard is something of a cult figure among a large number
of literary critics, philosophers, and theologians (see Joseph Bottum's «Girard Among the Girardians,» March 1996).
As a result there is more likely to be a criticism of the assumptions of one generation
of literary critics by the next.
Adam Kirsch has a charming essay marking the 100 birthday
of literary critic M. H. Abrams over at the Tablet, one well worth reading.
Geertz in fact likens the work of an ethnographer to
that of a literary critic, and Heilman deliberately sets his study in a dramaturgical framework, suggesting that the relation of empirical study to narrative art may be closer than usually believed.
When Coetzee dons the hat
of a literary critic, as he does in the 23 pieces collected in his new book, Late Essays: 2006 — 2017, it is his novelist's eye that prevails.
Anxiety and Its Influence The episode on I - 95 describes, to some extent, my larger protracted history with a family of reductive artists a generation older than me, a case of «anxiety of influence,» in the words
of literary critic Harold Bloom.
From this perspective, Prof. Grad gives us some close «readings» of Avery's work, rather in the manner
of a literary critic explicating the content of a lyric poem, and she is particularly energetic in making those comparisons with other American painters whose work, as she says, «touches on the pastoral mode.»
Not exact matches
«There is no more somber enemy
of good art than the pram in the hall,» English
literary critic Cyril Connolly declared seventy something years ago.
The famous
literary critic Lionel Trilling gave Eliot at least one good review, writing in the September 1962 edition
of Esquire (as quoted in The International Thesaurus
of Quotations (Harper Collins, 1996), p. 508, and in R. Andrews, Famous Lines: The Columbia Dictionary
of Familiar Quotations (Columbia Univ..
That story has been described by the
literary critic Harold Bloom (himself not the least Christian) as one
of the great stories in world literature.»
Beginning with Friedrich Schleiermacher in a letter published in 1807, biblical textual
critics and scholars examining the texts fail to find their vocabulary and
literary style similar to Paul's unquestionably authentic letters, fail to fit the life situation
of Paul in the epistles into Paul's reconstructed biography, and identify principles
of the emerged Christian church rather than those
of the apostolic generation.
The ineffectiveness
of literary criticism when faced with so - called documentary literature is an indication
of how far the
critics» thinking has lagged behind the stage
of the productive forces.
What do we do with — or, more accurately, without — that strange breed
of writer, the
literary critic?
The great
literary critic Frank Kermode wrote
of «The Figure in the Carpet» that «Vereker's secret — «the thing for the
critic to find» — is not, we infer, the sort
of thing the celibate and impotent may look for when they speculate about sex.
He is one
of a chorus
of critics whose expertise ranges across the academic disciplines - philosophers, geologists, drama
critics,
literary men and women, students
of law and
of history, theologians, and so on.
My own temptation is to become a
literary critic, wag my head learnedly and say, «Well, this obviously is a bit
of hyperbole — the sort
of exaggeration a teacher would use to shock his students awake.»
Few contemporary theologians would disagree with this statement, but we might well expect that many
of Weisinger's brothers in arms, the
literary critics, would raise a cry
of protest against this seeming assault upon the reality
of the individual mythical vision.
As Erich Auerbach, a
literary critic Frei much admired, once wrote
of the Bible: «Far from seeking... merely to make us forget our own reality for a few hours, it seeks to overcome our reality: we are to fit our own life into its world, feel ourselves to be elements in its structure
of universal history.
Now any
literary critic — or anyone with, common sense — knows that the meaning
of a realistically told story can never be reduced to a moral.
It has many sources, from redaction
critics who started looking at each Gospel as a whole to
literary scholars like Northrop Frye and Frank Kermode who have called renewed attention to the narrative shape
of biblical texts.
the Indian
literary critic, writer
of the post-colonized English says, «English, in this context is decolonized through a nativization
of theme, space and time, a change
of canon from the Western to the Indian... «19 These stylistic changes in language influence the modern - biblical translation, especially in the Indian context.
For the New
Critics the
literary text was considered an autonomous work
of art, to be studied independently
of its authors intentions and
of the sociopolitical currents
of the time in which it was produced.
Thus, where historical criticism, reading the Book
of Isaiah, tries to distinguish which materials come from the eighth - century prophet, the sixth - century prophet and the fifth - century prophet,
literary and canonical
critics focus on how the final form
of the book has created the context within which all
of its materials are now to be read, as a movement from judgment to salvation.
They often find they have more to learn from, and discuss with,
literary critics than with historians; indeed, the
literary analysis
of the Bible is becoming a minor industry.
This posture is assumed when those writers represent the major islands
of Western
literary tradition, the central cultural engine — so it goes —
of racism, poverty, sexism, homophobia, and imperialism: a cesspool that
literary critics would expose for mankind's benefit.
During the great battles on the legalization
of divorce and homosexual acts, the notable campaigners then were really distinguished public figures, for example: Bruce Arnold, mentioned above, Prof. Richard Humphries
of the University College Dublin School
of Law, historian Prof. John A. Murphy mentioned above,
of University College Cork, the journalist Kevin Myers, the
literary critic Prof. David Norris
of Trinity College Dublin, former Reid Professor
of Laws at Trinity College Dublin, later President
of the Republic, Mary Robinson.
While most moralists and
literary critics of this century have viewed comedy as frivolous, a hindrance to serious thinking, Auden used it in the service
of morality.
If the question were expanded to include novelists — the most sociological
of major art forms — a well - informed
literary critic might offer a few names such as Ron Hansen or Alice McDermott, authors whose subject matter is often overtly Catholic.
Tough - guy New York newspaperman Pete Hamill praised the book as a scathing indictment
of the «culture
of poverty» (yes, he really uses this phrase) fostered by «Eamon de Valera's Ireland,» while the
literary critic Denis Donoghue, writing in the New York Times, presented the book in much the same way (though he clearly lacks Hamill's enthusiasm for the story).
Today, if any living Catholic novelist or poet has a major reputation, that reputation has not been made by Catholic
critics but by the secular
literary world, often in spite
of their religious identity.
The few occurrences
of the term have been regarded as unauthentic by most
literary critics.
But we are faced just like the
literary critic with figuring out what the text says,
of constructing a reading
of it.
A piece
of literature would be ink scrawls on paper, and a great
literary critic would be someone with an ocular affinity for black on white.
In these studies Buber leads us on a narrow ridge between the traditionalist's insistence on the literal truth
of the biblical narrative and the modern
critic's tendency to regard this narrative as
of merely
literary or symbolic significance.
He was a poet and
literary critic, but I think it does no disservice to his memory to say that his poetry was not quite first rate and that his criticism was eclectic, occasional and
of varying quality.
• I came across Chamfort's observation about slavery and freedom in The Hall
of Uselessness, a wonderful collection
of essays by Simon Leys, the pen name
of scholar and
literary critic Pierre Ryckmans.
In the Chronicle
of Higher Education
literary critic Terry Eagleton writes an interesting if confused article in praise (and defense)
of Marx (once again for the umpteenth time).
While Allen Tate and John Crowe Ransom continued their brilliance as
literary critics — the former delving deeper into the personal past exemplary
of a whole traditional way
of life, while the latter explored the heights and depths
of metaphysical abstraction and the linguistic analytics
of poetry.
After it was published I experienced what
literary critics often point out, that any work
of art — a poem, a painting, even a book
of theology — quickly escapes its creator's hand and takes on a life
of its own.
Similarly, it was not Voltaire, the most prominent among the
literary critics of Christianity in the eighteenth century, who suggested constructive means by which healing might be effected, but men
of the type
of Schleiermacher, Maurice, Kingsley, Robertson, Bushnell, Chalmers, Wichern, Rauschenbusch.
That view, incidentally, has been thoughtfully contested by
literary critics and legal scholars alike over the years, who have questioned whether Atticus's defense
of Tom Robinson in the 1960 novel was motivated by a commitment to justice that transcended race, or by a commitment to professional rectitude.
No one has grasped the magic
of Dostoevsky's novels better than the Russian
literary critic Mikhail Bakhtin.
One
of his central contentions as a
literary critic was that after the seventeenth century the novel had degenerated because
of a lack
of religious seriousness.
It is, therefore, no surprise that academic
literary critics, who owe their very existence to Shakespeare and other great writers, have cast doubt upon Shakespeare's exalted position at exactly the moment in history when the societies
of the West have become most anxious about their own integrity and probity.
Kurzweil's
critics are legion, but even the severest
of them would have to admit that he was the very model
of the engaged
literary scholar.
As with Eliot, one suspects, so with Ozick, whose own career has included the twinned and twined roles
of storyteller and
literary critic.
For Ozick, however, the
literary critic is herself the architect
of literary tradition, arranging works, authors, movements, and trends in conversation with one another, «teas [ing] out hidden imperatives and assumptions held in common, and... creat [ing] the fertilizing conditions that underlie and stimulate a living
literary consciousness.»
Throughout I have depended on the scholarship
of others, most
of whom are historians,
literary critics, or political scientists, but the primary data are the original texts written or spoken by Americans from the 17th century to the present, that are liberally scattered through every chapter.