For those charter schools that have collective bargaining units, some adapt the agreement
of the local authorizer, while others negotiate separate agreements with employee groups.
Not exact matches
I've got to believe that it's something about the structure
of the charter sector — its governance by mission - driven boards instead
of local politicians; its ability to recruit and retain educators that share a vision rather than a collective bargaining agreement (and conventional preparation and certification); its sense
of urgency driven by accountability to
authorizers and funders — that makes the difference.
Local school districts are the primary
authorizer for most charters, but charter schools can also be approved by their county or the state board
of education if rejected by their district.
Of all charter schools closed by local authorizers or their own boards, the vast majority had financial problems — meaning that they generally suffered from a lack of parental deman
Of all charter schools closed by
local authorizers or their own boards, the vast majority had financial problems — meaning that they generally suffered from a lack
of parental deman
of parental demand.
Only one
of Detroit's charter
authorizers is
local — DPS, which authorizes 13 schools; the rest are colleges and universities with headquarters outside
of the city.
Ninety percent
of authorizers are
local school districts, many
of which view charters as an administrative inconvenience, competitive nuisance, or worse.
Local school districts now constitute 90 percent
of charter school
authorizers and could have fostered the kind
of cross-fertilization Shanker envisioned, but they've tended instead to treat charters as distant cousins.
Twenty groups hoping to run new charter schools submitted 43 applications to a review committee, comprising a team from the National Association
of Charter School
Authorizers and
local, state, and national representatives.
In addition to dedicated professional staff and board members, our vision requires efforts from a broad coalition
of authorizers, superintendents, and state and
local advocacy organizations, as well as public officials, civic leaders, funders, and others.
The central problem with making growth the polestar
of accountability systems, as Mike Petrilli and Aaron Churchill argue in «Stop Focusing on Proficiency Rates When Evaluating Schools,» is that it is only convincing if one is rating schools from the perspective
of a charter
authorizer or
local superintendent who wants to know whether a given school is boosting the achievement
of its pupils, worsening their achievement, or holding it in some kind
of steady state.
Two parallel processes are being set up to start up to 40
of the new public schools in five years: the Charter School Commission and
local school boards that apply to be
authorizers through the State Board
of Education.
(A statewide charter
authorizer would effectively supersede and therefore negate authority
of local charter
authorizers such as Metro.)
Charter schools will be authorized through two different paths in Washington: through
local school boards that get permission from the State Board
of Education to be
authorizers and through the new statewide commission.
Unlike many other states, advocates say, Massachusetts» governance system designates state education officials as sole
authorizers of independently run charter schools, overruling
local mayors and unions.
The Tacoma School Board's original objection to charters focused on the loss
of control, but Santorno agreed with Redinger that not becoming an
authorizer may mean giving up whatever
local control the district could maintain.
Charter schools will be authorized through two different paths in Washington:
local school boards that get permission from the State Board
of Education to be
authorizers, and through the new statewide commission.
Every KIPP school is approved to operate by a charter school
authorizer — typically a district school board, university, or state department
of education — that makes sure the school is living up to the commitments in its charter and is in compliance with relevant federal, state, and
local requirements.
In order for a
local school board to become an
authorizer, the board must have approval from the state board
of education.
Charter support organizations and charter school
authorizers such as
local boards
of education, are also members.
Upon denial by a
local authorizer, applicants may submit their petitions to the State Board
of Education.
The charter contract is a legally binding document between the following parties: the petitioner, the
local authorizer and the State Board
of Education.
After approval by a
local authorizer, the petition must be submitted to the Charter Schools Division at the Georgia Department
of Education.
The certification levels
of proposed teachers may be considered by the
local and state
authorizers when evaluating the petition.
The report recommends several solutions including that legislators and policymakers address these barriers by providing equitable and adequate special education funding to charter schools and
authorizers through a system that prioritizes accountability,
local control, and responsiveness to evolving needs
of students.
They are run by independent boards instead
of elected
local school boards and answer to an
authorizer that oversees their charter agreement.
This guidance provides valuable information and suggestions to assist schools, state and
local education agencies,
authorizers of charter schools, parents, and other stakeholders in understanding how federal laws function to provide protections for students with disabilities in order to ensure they receive a quality education free from discrimination.
Their
authorizers, state departments
of education and
local school districts all collectively share responsibility, and each has room to improve.
While many states such as Texas have an authorization process that allows state education agency authorization and to a lesser extent
local districts, other states such as Ohio allow a broad mix
of authorizers to approve charters, including
local districts, higher education institutions, and non-profit agencies.
The ability to collectively voice concerns and advocate for improved special education policies with charter
authorizers, special education
local plan areas, and the California Department
of Education.
If need be, the state board can override the
local authorizer's denial, which it did most
of the time.
Question: Under the
Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), what revenues are included in the calculation
of the oversight fee that charter school
authorizers are allowed to charge their charter schools?
During her time in the state legislature Ms. Morgan was a co-sponsor
of the 2012 Constitutional Amendment, which allowed for an alternate state
authorizer to open charter schools denied by
local school districts.
Local school boards account for 173
of 175 potential charter school
authorizers in Kentucky and are required under KRS 160.1594 to, among other tasks, «solicit, invite, and evaluate applications from applicants.»
DeArmond, Jochim, and Lake (2014) looked at how the issue
of governance affects both charters and traditional public schools in high - choice cities and found nearly eight agencies — including school districts, charter
authorizers, and other state and
local entities — responsible for oversight in the typical municipality, «making patchwork governance the norm, rather than the exception» (p. 15).
Manager, Special Education 213-349-1486
[email protected] Vivian is a part
of the Special Education Statewide Advocacy Team and supports work that includes technical assistance to schools, special education advocacy at the
local and state levels, special education data collection, and engagement with SELPAs and charter school
authorizers in ensuring quality options for charter schools.
All annual audits and fraud risk assessments should be posted on the websites
of charter school
authorizers, typically the
local school system;
A charter school is a tuition free public school created on the basis
of a contract or «charter» between the school and a
local school board or other
authorizer.
In addition to dedicated professional staff and board members, our vision requires efforts from a broad coalition
of authorizers, superintendents, and state and
local advocacy organizations, as well as public officials, civic leaders, lawmakers, funders, and others.
Such charter
authorizers are not elected officials accountable to parents and the community and do not have the same stake in the vitality and improvement
of local public schools.
The State should provide for
authorizer involvement, as appropriate, in the oversight and development
of charter school
Local Control and Accountability Plans to make them robust tools for autonomous charter school improvement and accountability.
The
authorizer is usually the
local school district - some charter schools are authorized by their county office
of education or the State Board
of Education.
«It's leading states like Georgia in the reverse way: Its locales don't want to send the
local portion
of their student funding to a state
authorizer who has authority over kids in their district,» he said.
Charter school parents,
local communities, public officials, and charter school
authorizers have been mostly unaware
of the Gulen movement and its operation
of the charter schools.
Charter schools also have oversight from their
authorizers (the
local school district, county office
of education or State Board
of Education).
Contrary to Burris» assertion that they shun accountability, charter school officials have called for better oversight instead
of the hodgepodge system in place whereby 324
local, county and state agencies act as
authorizers.