Sentences with phrase «of male leadership»

One slogan of the movement, «Girls say yes to men who say no,» revealed the sexist insensitivity of the male leadership of the movement, it was assumed that women working in the movement were simply molls of the male resisters.

For many women in the peace movements of the «60s, feminist consciousness was sparked by increasing recognition of the sexism of the male leadership in the peace movement itself.

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

Not exact matches

The leadership at all of the top tech companies is overwhelmingly male.

Male employees make up 79 percent of tech jobs, 81 percent of engineering, and 84 percent of leadership positions.

Research shows that people correlate a certain set of facial features with leadership (at least, if you're a white male)

Gender diversity and leadership in tech is an urgent issue to address, not merely to offer balance to a male - dominated industry, but because of the strength and impact of its ripple effect.

A significant share of the companies, 37 percent, have all - male leadership teams, while an additional 21 percent have only one woman.

However, a study by Zenger and Folkman sought to evaluate the effectiveness of male versus female leaders in 16 leadership qualities.

Author Jill Griffin argues that since men still hold most of the leadership positions, women need male mentors, too.

Under his leadership, it was promoted by bare - chested male models and transformed into an upscale retailer for dudes in their early 20s with $ 148 to spend on a pair of jeans.

Corporations spend billions of dollars to attract and manage diversity both internally and externally, yet they still face discrimination lawsuits, and the leadership ranks of the business world remain predominantly white and male.

CALGARY — Days after a female candidate cited intolerable abuse as her reason for pulling out of the race for the leadership of the Alberta Conservatives, a male candidate says he has also had verbal threats aimed at him.

Recent diversity reports of major tech companies show that white males make up the vast majority of their workforce and leadership...

Want a dominant church that just (by coincidence, of course) chooses only it's members for any leadership, along with a few «Token» women and non-whites, just to crush any white males not of the faith that might compete?

It neglects the propensity of evil coming from men and that there's no mandate for leadership to be male only.

I suspected I'd get a little pushback from fellow Christians who hold a complementarian perspective on gender, (a position that requires women to submit to male leadership in the home and church, and often appeals to «biblical womanhood» for support), but I had hoped — perhaps naively — that the book would generate a vigorous, healthy debate about things like the Greco Roman household codes found in the epistles of Peter and Paul, about the meaning of the Hebrew word ezer or the Greek word for deacon, about the Paul's line of argumentation in 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 11, about our hermeneutical presuppositions and how they are influenced by our own culture, and about what we really mean when we talk about «biblical womanhood» — all issues I address quite seriously in the book, but which have yet to be engaged by complementarian critics.

Guilty pietists were eager to accommodate, not least among them an aging white male leadership that had never recovered its confidence after the earthquakes of the sixties.

There have also been churches entrenched in a male - only model of leadership, whose leaders sound more like Plato than Jesus.

In my experience, single adult females fell under the «leadership» of the male pastor, who heavily influenced our view of sexuality and ourselves, with what their view was (which, as the pastor, was of course biblically sound).

Regardless of the degree or nature of gender differences, to propose that men and women share leadership and authority is not to say there are no differences between males and females.

One of my concerns about some expressions of complementarianism is this idea that «male leadership» somehow precludes the washing of dishes, folding of laundry, changing of diapers, etc., so that such work is the exclusive responsibility of women.

Women have equally strong skills and gifts in the areas of church management, finance, administration and supervision; many of us have been reluctant to exercise those skills or claim those gifts because they may differ from male leadership styles.

One aspect of this difference can be explained by the value the wider society continues to place on male leadership.

Phoebe is a diakonos, in exactly the same position of leadership as a male church leader.

I hope the good Sisters and Nuns stick to their guns and cease to take the scrutiny and questioning by the male - dominated leadership of the Church.

I felt only a twinge of guilt when I exercised authority over the male members of my leadership team.

Again, the point I would make about Gal 3:28 is not to see that as being about an argument for «equality» (for example women in leadership) but that it is possible to be part of the body of Christ for everyone and that you don't have to be male / Jew / free for that.

The lies of the male delusion of ownership / leadership of women is truly laughably / tragically sad.

Although there may be some variation on the specifics, broadly speaking, complementarians believe that women are biblically - bound to submit to male leadership in the home and in church life, which means that husbands are ultimately responsible for decision - making on behalf of their families and that women should refrain from assuming leadership positions over men in a church setting.

And of course the Manifesto says nothing of submitting to male leadership if one's husband desires a polygamous family (as was allowed in Scripture, even if it wasn't specifically recommended), but instead says that the TRUE woman affirms that marriage is a covenant «between one man and one woman.»

We carry an emotional and theological residue from centuries of male - dominated church leadership.

(For more on why Jesus» choosing of the twelve male disciples should not exclude women from leadership see Daniel Kirk's post, «On Jesus Choosing Twelve Males»)

They also teach a more complementarian view of male - female relationships with a strong emphasis on the leadership or headship of men, particularly in the church and home.

I could go on and on here: The adjectives used to describe women in leadership roles versus the ones used to describe men in similar jobs, the previous arrest record of black people involved in a law enforcement shooting and yet never the officer's misconduct record, the average amount of lines given to male characters over female.

I claim to be a feminist and yet presume I possess traces of misogyny simply because I am a male, raised as a male, educated as a male, ordained as a male, and served as a part of a male - dominated leadership of an institution historically dominated by male power, mindset and ideology.

Recent diversity reports of major tech companies show that white males make up the vast majority of their workforce and leadership teams.

The RCC (a non-business) restricts their leadership to males i.e. both discriminatory and examples of bigotry but still allowed by the courts.

Even so, male dominance in Hebrew politics and religion did not inhibit the martial valor of Jael or Judith, did not belittle the leadership of Deborah, a prophetess, a judge, and as she said, «a mother in Israel.»

The business cult of Mormonism already restricts their leadership to white males.

Women have long expressed a desire, passion and capability to join the highest ranks of the culinary industry, but continue to lack the same access, opportunities and support as their male counterparts — with less than a quarter of females chefs in leadership roles.

«This is part of a disgraceful pattern, just like when he kept white male Republican leadership in the State Senate instead of supporting Andrea Stewart Cousin's leadership,» they continued.»

Harman's said she's not running for leader, so: (1) she likes the current job; (2) she reckons she'd have no chance of the leadership; (3) since all the «front runners» are male (so far...), she still thinks it's her job (and hers alone?)

[56] Inside the Labour Party, Harman has said she does «not agree with all - male leaderships» because men «can not be left to run things on their own»; and that, consequently, one of Labour's top two posts should always be held by a woman.

This is part of a disgraceful pattern, just like when he kept white male Republican leadership in the State Senate instead of supporting Andrea Stewart Cousin's leadership.

The German Green Party has never won over 11 percent of the national vote, yet for three decades has consistently won seats and promoted women's leadership by having a 50 - 50 rule for female / male candidates, prodding other major parties to nominate more women.

Some observers felt that the local team had opted for Ali precisely because she was an outsider with less chance of winning, the aim being to punish the Labour leadership for barring the favoured male candidate.

Labour have a lot to be proud of when it comes to equalities, and it would give the wrong impression if its leadership contest was all male.

Either, [Assemblywomen] are out of touch or reluctant to look in - house at their male leadership.

Labour's leadership core consists of Corbyn and McDonnell with Watson as the formal back - up, the leadership contest in 2016 was an all - male shoot - out after Angela Eagle stood aside, there were no female candidates for any of the city - region Mayoralties in 2017 and, as Tories love to point out, they've had two female PMs to Labour's zero.