I have looked at the temperature records in the round, and I can not discern any unmistakable signature
of manmade warming.
Yes sure try to tell us that Antarctic cooling, a stratospheric cooling pause for 19 years, a global heating pause for 17 years and no ocean warming since accurate records replaced abject guesswork are all just «not relevant» rather than 4 separate clear refutations
of manmade warming.
Example Study of «True Global Warming Signal» Finds «Remarkably Steady» Rate
of Manmade Warming Since 1979
While El Niño contributed to the record, a Climate Central analysis has shown that 2015's high temperature was overwhelmingly the result
of manmade warming.
Not exact matches
He and Gingrich don't disagree on evolution and
manmade global
warming probably happening, but the ex-governor does have a firmer grasp on what's required to deal with the economic crisis
of our time.
And about 70 percent
of his fans among weekly worshipers agree on the seriousness
of global
warming, while about 40 percent agree it is
manmade.
Unfortunately, there are examples
of at least one study, which claims 97 percent
of climate scientists agree global
warming is happening and is
manmade, which may have done a not - so - great job
of reaching such a conclusion.
lists a number
of scientific bodies that hold to the belief that global
warming is happening and is
manmade.
With respect to global
warming, it's better to think in terms
of manmade climate and environmental change.
However, the recent period
of cooling does suggest that either
manmade global
warming may be smaller or that the impact
of other factors may be greater than climate models have so far assumed.
A U.N. panel
of scientists says it is at least 90 percent probable that
manmade greenhouse gases are the main cause
of recent
warming, rather than natural variations.
The new analysis suggests no discernable decrease in the rate
of warming between the second half
of the 20th century, a period marked by
manmade warming, and the first fifteen years
of the 21st century, a period dubbed a global
warming
Several studies suggest that recent Californian droughts have a
manmade component arising from increased temperatures, with the likelihood
of such
warming - enhanced droughts expected to increase in the future.
While a strong El Niño has given global temperatures a boost, the bulk
of that heat comes from the
manmade global
warming driven by increasing amounts
of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
(A Climate Central analysis conducted in November also found that
manmade warming was the key driver
of the record heat
of 2015.)
It is virtually certain that 2015 will be the
warmest year on record, with one
of the strongest El Niños ever recorded combining with
manmade warming to send global temperatures soaring.
Discussions to implement a landmark agreement to limit
manmade warming are currently underway in Morocco, though negotiators are concerned that the election
of Donald Trump could derail these efforts.
Alaska is one
of the fastest -
warming states in the U.S., largely because the nearby Arctic region is
warming rapidly in response to
manmade global
warming and natural variability.
The
manmade emissions fueling global
warming are accumulating so quickly in the atmosphere that climate change could spiral out
of control before humanity can take measures drastic enough to cool the earth's fever, many climate scientists say.
The UN's IPCC misled the press and public into believing that thousands
of scientists backed its claims on
manmade global
warming, according to Mike Hulme, a prominent climate scientist and IPCC insider.
It is virtually certain that 2015 will be the
warmest year on record, with one
of the strongest El Ninos ever recorded combining with
manmade warming to send global temperatures soaring.
While a strong El Niño and other climate patterns are playing a role in regional and global temperatures, the vast majority
of the excess heat this year comes from
manmade global
warming, a Climate Central analysis showed.
First, the hypothesis
of manmade global
warming is only supported by general circulation models, which are known to be imperfect representations
of the Earth's climate systems.
Dive with docile whale sharks, the world s largest fish, at Ningaloo Reef between April and June, swim with wild bottlenose dolphins in the
warm waters
of Monkey Mia and get up close to sea lions, manta rays, dugongs and humpback whales, explore the charming old pearling port
of Broome and take a camel ride down Cable Beach at sunset, fly over the beehive shaped domes
of the Bungle Bungle Range, boat down the huge,
manmade Lake Argyle at Kununurra, explore the wineries and beaches
of the Margaret River region, cruise spectacular Geikie and Windjana Gorges in the remote and rugged Kimberley, see the stark outback come alive with glorious wildflowers in winter and early spring and enjoy the sophisticated delights
of Perth and the historic port
of Fremantle.
The now conventional view on global
warming, as stated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is that most
of the
warming recorded in the past 50 years has been caused by emissions
of manmade greenhouse gases.
Also, the idea is to keep
warming below +1.5 ºC even with the current energy imbalance (
warming in the pipeline) and reductions in aerosols that accompany emissions reductions (though Hansen says the impact
of aerosols from fossil fuels was overstated and other
manmade aerosols seem to dominate).
In addition, according to the recent PNAS paper by Yangyang Xua and Veerabhadran Ramanathan, «Well below 2 °C: Mitigation strategies for avoiding dangerous to catastrophic climate changes» (http://www.pnas.org/content/114/39/10315.full),
manmade aerosols are currently «hiding» 0.9 C
of warming.
I honestly think she's too young to be listening to me going on and on about such confusing stuff as oil, gas, coal, greenhouse effect, global
warming,
manmade climate change, population explosion (she knows about it), deforestation, desertification, rapid extinction
of other species, pollution, problems, overconsumption, overindustrialization, problems, politics, economics, consumerism, and problems, religion, war, etc., etc., etc..
«This
manmade global
warming hoax is about two things: empowering government to run more
of the private sector, and turning carbon dioxide into gold as in «carbon credits.»»
This message merited designation as an «Extra,» and had the title «Carbon dioxide production by benthic bacteria: the death
of manmade global
warming theory?»
The most dizzying response to the revelation that the paper was a fake came on globalwarminghoax.com, which says it is devoted to «refuting the myth
of manmade global
warming.»
Each
of these were trumpeted as the final nail in the coffin for
manmade warming but subsequent analysis has dismissed them because
of their many errors.
It occurs to me; the politicians understand that 97 %
of scientists (not just climate scientists) believe global
warming is real and
manmade.
In the latest chapter in the ongoing crusade against
manmade global
warming, alarmists have blamed climate change for the creation
of «ghost forests» along the U.S. Atlantic seaboard.
10: Given that the authors
of the largest ever survey
of peer - reviewed opinion in learned papers marked only 64
of 11,944 papers, or 0.5 %, as stating they agreed with the official «consensus» proposition that recent
warming was mostly
manmade, on what rational, evidence - based, scientific ground is it daily asserted that «97 %
of scientists» believe recent global
warming is not only
manmade but dangerous?
That tropical mid-troposphere «hot - spot» (one
of us gave it its name) was, we were told, the undeniable fingerprint
of manmade global
warming.
The theory
of manmade global
warming has been on the decline since the 2009 Climategate scandal revealed that the «science» behind the theory was far from objective.
But the paper makes no quantification
of how much
of the total observed
warming is
manmade, and therefore can't possibly be taken as an endorsement that most
warming is human caused.
Critics have noticed for several years that the theory
of manmade global
warming is dying a slow death, but the institutional delay that is attendant in any government program has immunized the rush to alternative energy from some measure
of public backlash and the realities
of governmental budgets in an era
of declining economies and deficit spending.
If we don't know how much
of recent
warming is natural, then how can we know how much is
manmade?
I envisage that it is quite likely that temperatures today in the Northern Hemisphere are no
warmer than they were in the 1930s / 1940, and given that some 95 %
of all
manmade emissions have taken place since 1940, this suggests that Climate Sensitivity, if any at all, to CO2 is low.
Polar bears, as we know, have a special status as the poster children
of the
manmade global
warming «it's all our fault and the planet is doomed due to our selfishness, greed and refusal to amend our carbon - guzzling lifestyles» movement.
In that paper, we revealed that only 41, or 0.3 %,
of 11,944 learned papers on climate and related topics published in the journals over the 21 years 1991 - 2011 had stated that recent global
warming was mostly
manmade.
The five and half hours
of programmes which attack the thesis (and there have been many more which savage other aspects
of environmentalism) express absolute certainty that
manmade global
warming isn't happening.
Inadvertently, Cook et al. have provided definitive evidence that the IPCC has no basis whatsoever for its absurd «95 % confidence» that more than half
of all post-1950
warming was
manmade.
Such grants have brought us «studies» connecting «dangerous
manmade global
warming» to dwindling frog populations, shrinking Italian pasta supplies, clownfish getting lost, cockroaches migrating, and scores
of other remote to ridiculous assertions.
There were 3896 papers explicitly or implicitly endorsing the notion that we cause some
warming, among which the 64 that were marked as endorsing the notion that more than half
of post-1950
warming was
manmade were hidden by lumping together the three «levels
of endorsement» in a single number, and not revealing separately how many papers fell into each «level
of endorsement».
Scientists who have been skeptical about
manmade global
warming have been called traitors or handmaidens
of big oil.
There are multiple lines
of evidence that suggest that temperatures (at any rate in the Northern Hemisphere) are no
warmer today than they were back in the late 1930s / early 1940s, notwithstanding that during this period some 95 %
of all
manmade CO2 emissions have taken place.
None
of them wants to derail that gravy train, and all fear that accepting grants to study natural factors or climate cycles would imperil funding from sources that have ideological, political or crony corporatist reasons for making grants tied to
manmade warming, renewable energy and related topics.