It's a little reactionary in a kind of «Forrest Gump» - y sort of way — the moral runs that it's better to be decent than brilliant, happy than successful — but the film is well - meaning and the performances from a stellar cast (Joe Mantegna, Ben Kingsley's accent, Laurence Fishburne, Joan Allen, Laura Linney, William H Macy all show up) mostly walk the right side
of mawkishness.
Not exact matches
There's no place for
mawkishness in a film like this; such elements might have worked had the movie claimed to be a realistic portrayal
of young adults, but when you have a character as outrageous as Stifler, that's clearly not the case.
But the fragmented storytelling and oozing
mawkishness so wildly out
of place in a movie about monsters eating people signals the death rattle for the project.
Worse than that is when McCarten tries for
mawkishness, as in a sequence
of Churchill communing with the common man.
As a piece
of storytelling, well, it manages to pull off its ludicrous plot fairly nicely, mostly avoiding
mawkishness and cloyingness.
The «Sundance Effect» has unfortunately developed a near plague
of insufferable, self - conscious
mawkishness over the years.
while the overt emotionality
of an episode such as Vincent and the Doctor (in which the Doctor meets up with Vincent van Gogh to battle a space monster) may tie into the show's larger mythos however veers into
mawkishness.
It's endearing in its
mawkishness, and the storybook nature
of its narrative is
of the same quality you'd find on a child's bedside table, but it isn't a satisfying game to play despite the contrivances it makes in an attempt to fool you into thinking it is.