Sentences with phrase «of meaningful human control»

There were several questions covering a range of concerns including the viability of an international treaty, status of research and development by the US, concept of meaningful human control, and views of the scientific community on the need for regulation.

Under a section elaborating on «control» (page 5), the authors note that «for certain types of safety - critical AI systems — especially vehicles and weapons platforms — it may be desirable to retain some form of meaningful human control, whether this means a human in the loop, on the loop, or some other protocol.»

The campaign calls for any future deliberations at the CCW on killer robots to not repeat the 2014 meeting, which requires «going deeper in exploring substantive aspects, such as the notion of meaningful human control.»

Not exact matches

«We therefore publicly declare that we will boycott all collaborations with any part of KAIST until such time as the President of KAIST provides assurances, which we have sought but not received, that the Center will not develop autonomous weapons lacking meaningful human control.»

The IMI could also control and organize access to metadata (the associated host disease phenotype data, for a human gut microbiota sample, for instance) without which meaningful interpretation of the data is not possible.

We therefore publicly declare that we will boycott all collaborations with any part of KAIST until such time as the President of KAIST provides assurances, which we have sought but not received, that the Center will not develop autonomous weapons lacking meaningful human control.

The concept of «meaningful human control» is something that my delegation is supportive of.

Weapons reviews must be grounded in new and robust international law that clearly and deliberately puts meaningful human control at the centre of all weapons development.

The campaign aims to engage at the regional level to build awareness and support for a collective response and it continues to explore other avenues that could lead states to adopt a new international instrument to retain meaningful human control over the critical functions of weapons systems.

The CCW should articulate first and foremost a legal commitment to ensuring meaningful human control and a constraint on the development of autonomy in the critical functions of weapons systems.

It will work to foster greater international and regional cooperation to convince governments concerned about retaining meaningful human control of future weapons systems to agree to an international ban.

In July 2015, thousands of AI researchers from around the world signed an open letter to the UN calling for a ban on offensive autonomous weapons beyond meaningful human control.

In view of the rapid pace of developments in military robotics, it is now urgent for States to consider what constitutes meaningful, or appropriate or effective, human control over the use of force.

The U.S. Department of Defense's Directive on Autonomous Weapons permits under - secretaries of defense, in certain cases, to bend its rule that weapons remain under meaningful human control.

For example we have to further deepen our understanding of what we exactly mean by «meaningful human control» when we talk about these weapon systems.

Meaningful Human Control could be a very relevant subject of our CCW - meeting on topic in 2015.

There is a need to ensure appropriate or meaningful human control or judgement over the use of force, including the use of lethal force against human targets.

The campaign urges states to participate in the CCW Group of Governmental Experts meeting, which opens at the United Nations (UN) on Monday, 9 April, and to commit to retain meaningful human control of weapons systems and over individual attacks.

From this rich dialogue some nascent concepts or principles are finding broad agreement, most notably the notion that meaningful human control must be retained over the operation of weapons systems.

Members of the Artificial Intelligence research community exhort the Prime Minister of Canada to join the international call to ban lethal autonomous weapons that remove meaningful human control in the deployment of lethal force.

«As part of the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots, we have frequently heard from Canadians that they want to ensure that there is meaningful human control over weapons at all times.

In February 2016, the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions and the Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association issued a report recommending that «autonomous weapons systems that require no meaningful human control should be prohibited.»

Nearly all of the 90 countries participating in this debate have acknowledged the need to retain meaningful or necessary human control over the use of force involving autonomous weapons.

To make progress, we believe our discussions could focus on deepening our understanding of what we exactly mean by «meaningful human control».

In a letter delivered to the Prime Minister's Office last week, we exhort Justin Trudeau to join an international call to ban autonomous weapons that remove meaningful human control in the deployment of lethal force.

In the afternoon session chaired by Ambassador Beatriz Londono Soto of Colombia four presenters from Germany, the Netherlands, and UK will address indicator - based approaches, meaningful human control, and human judgment.

Campaign representative Richard Moyes from Article 36 spoke about meaningful human control of autonomous weapons at a side event on 16 October hosted by UNIDIR and the governments of the Netherlands and Switzerland.

It supports the recommendation to create a Group of Governmental Experts and urges states to identify an ambitious outcome for such a «GGE» to work towards by aiming to negotiate a new CCW protocol retaining meaningful human control of weapons systems and individual attacks.

These are future weapons systems that would lack meaningful human control over the critical functions of selecting and attacking targets.

Switzerland shares the concern expressed by several states with regard to the development of weapons systems which in their acquisition, identification and attack of targets, including human ones, are not subject to meaningful human control.

How do we define a concept at the centre of UN discussion like «meaningful human control»?

Lethal autonomous weapons systems that remove meaningful human control from determining the legitimacy of targets and deploying lethal force sit on the wrong side of a clear moral line.»

In February 2016, the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions and the Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association presented a report to the Human Rights Council that recommended: «Autonomous weapons systems that require no meaningful human control should be prohibited.&rHuman Rights Council that recommended: «Autonomous weapons systems that require no meaningful human control should be prohibited.&rhuman control should be prohibited.»

Ms. Maya Brehm of Article 36, a campaign co-founder, will speak on the concept of «meaningful human control» of autonomous warfare.

These and other systems with high degrees of autonomy must be examined in order to understand how meaningful human control is exercised and how civilians can be afforded adequate and lasting protections.

Wareham addressed Russia's desire for a working definition and affirmed that «by retaining meaningful human control over the use of lethal force in each individual attack we can in effect prohibit the use of fully autonomous weapons and thus achieve a preemptive ban.»

The imperative of maintaining meaningful human control over targeting and attack decisions emerged as the primary point of common ground at the meeting.

This week's deliberations show there is great concern with the prospect of future weapons that, once activated, would select and engage targets without meaningful human control.

Dec. 6 (Brussels) A total of 116 scientists working in fields including artificial intelligence, robotics and computer science issue an open letter calling on Belgium to support a ban on weapon systems lacking meaningful human control over the critical functions of targeting and engagement in every attack.

Binding legislation is required in the forms of a new international treaty and national laws to retain meaningful human control over future weapons systems and individual attacks.

The 58 - page Keeping Control report by Daan Kayser provides an overview of the positions of European states on lethal autonomous weapon systems, including on the call for a ban and on how to ensure weapons systems remain under meaningful human cControl report by Daan Kayser provides an overview of the positions of European states on lethal autonomous weapon systems, including on the call for a ban and on how to ensure weapons systems remain under meaningful human controlcontrol.

In February 2016, the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions and the Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association issued a report containing the recommendation that «autonomous weapons systems that require no meaningful human control should be prohibited.»

United Nations disarmament chief Angela Kane stated this week (2 July) that «there is a widespread view» that weapons systems that have the capability of selecting and attacking targets without human intervention «must be subject to meaningful human control.»

To avoid future harm it is urging states to take action now to stop the creation of weapons that would choose and fire on targets on their own without meaningful human supervision or control.

The need for meaningful or adequate or another form of «human control» has been central to the debate with the majority of states speaking in support of retaining it.