In Michigan, for instance, the new chief state school officer recently replaced the test - focused accountability system with a new grading system that relies on a broader set
of measures of school quality, including family involvement, the quality of professional development, attendance, and dropout rates, among others.
Not exact matches
The
school data used for the ranking by the FT
measures such several factors that have little, if anything, to do with the actual
quality of the education received by graduates.
It is
measured by the
quality of godly life a «recovered» and «delivered» person is actually enjoying in sobriety — individually, with his family, with his job, with his business, with his
schools and churches, with his community, and in fellowship with his Creator.
The spending
measure, which requires legislative approval, also includes $ 1.1 billion in new
school spending; $ 2.5 billion for water
quality and water and sewer upgrades; expanded child care tax credits; and new powers for Cuomo, a Democrat, to adjust state spending in the face
of federal spending cuts.
Among the 92
school - age children aged 9 to 11 in the study, each snack raised their diet
quality by 2.31 points, as
measured on the Healthy Eating Index, 2005 developed by the U.S. Department
of Agriculture.
Researchers from the Perelman
School of Medicine at the University
of Pennsylvania, in partnership with ORGANIZE — a non-for-profit organization based in New York which leverages health data to end the organ donor shortage by applying smarter technologies, utilizing social media, building more creative partnerships, and advocating for data - driven policies — The Bridgespan Group — a global nonprofit organization that collaborates with mission - driven leaders, organizations, and philanthropists to break cycles
of poverty and dramatically improve the
quality of life for those in need — and Gift
of Life Donor Program — an OPO which serves the eastern half
of Pennsylvania, southern New Jersey, and Delaware — evaluated the metrics and criteria used to
measure OPOs across the country, and found significant discrepancies in how potential donors are evaluated and identified.
Even
measures of growth in test scores or VAM are not rigorously identified indicators
of school or program
quality as they do not reveal what the growth would have been in the absence
of that
school or program.
While opponents
of student testing often seem to have the biggest megaphone, polls show an overwhelming majority — 70 percent and up —
of parents think tests are a valid
measure of their child's achievement level and the
quality of schools.
Acknowledging that some
of the
measures it uses to judge the
quality of K12
schools are «inadequate or inappropriate,» the report calls for states to develop new and better instruments.
Their peers» average test scores are about 0.15 standard deviations higher, and the new
schools have higher -
quality teachers,
measured in terms
of the fraction
of teachers with less than three years» experience, the fraction that are new to the
school that year, the percentage
of teachers with an advanced degree, and the share
of teachers who attended a «highly competitive» college as defined by the Barron's rankings.
These
school indicators should also incorporate other
measures of key ingredients to long - term success, such as student performance in writing and oral presentations, teaching and curriculum
quality, student attitudes and culture, attendance, and
school leadership and management.
For the first part
of his dissertation, Muralidharan surveyed a representative sample
of more than 3,000 public
schools across India to
measure the
quality of public service delivery in education.
Looking across our analyses, we see that under IMPACT, DCPS has dramatically improved the
quality of teaching in its
schools — likely contributing to its status as the fastest - improving large urban
school system in the United States as
measured by the National Assessment
of Educational Progress.
The
measures used in the NEPC report — whether
schools make AYP, state accountability system ratings, the percentage
of students that score proficient on state tests, and high -
school graduation rates — are at best rough proxies for the
quality of education provided by any
school.
The NEPC report paints a dismal picture
of student learning at K12 - operated
schools, but the fatal flaw
of the report is that the
measures of «performance» it employs are based primarily on outcomes such as test scores that may reveal more about student background than about the
quality of the
school, and on inappropriate comparisons between virtual
schools and all
schools in the same state.
But as we turn to new
measures of school quality including production
of college and career ready students there is new space for advocates to research and promote the benefits
of school counselors.
The wrong response to recognizing that test scores fail to capture
school quality sufficiently is to increase the set
of high - stakes
measures we collect.
Many states nonetheless interpret the index as a simple
measure of school quality.
We also strongly urge states not to use «growth to proficiency»
measures, as these encourage
schools to ignore the needs
of their high - achievers (and are poor indicators
of school quality).
In this study I explore this question using data from the Charlotte - Mecklenburg (North Carolina)
school district (CMS) to
measure the impact
of school quality on arrest and incarceration rates.
High -
school lottery winners in the high - risk group and all middle -
school lottery winners experience modest increases in standard
measures of school quality.
For youth in the high - risk group, the gain as
measured by these
quality indicators is roughly equivalent to moving from one
of the lowest - ranked
schools to one around the district average.
Perhaps there are some «wrong» answers (such as relying exclusively on proficiency rates in reading and math to judge
school quality, or
measuring school spending and other inputs and calling it accountability) but mostly there are a whole bunch
of right and partially - right answers, depending on policymakers» goals and states» idiosyncrasies.
Almost none
of the participants in our ESSA design competition recommended that states use proficiency rates, reflecting the near - universal consensus that such rates are a bad
measure of school quality.
«College and Career Ready» indicators: Many states already include AP, IB, ACT, and SAT achievement in their high
school rating systems, and we heartily endorse all
of these
of these
measures, especially those tied to achievement on AP / IB tests, which are precisely the sort
of high -
quality assessments that critics
of dumbed - down standardized tests have long called for.
While grades on the Chance - for - Success Index are sometimes interpreted as
measures of school quality, researchers from CREDO found that the grades are closely related to
measures of family income and the level
of education achieved by parents in a state, and do not represent the contribution
of a state's
schools to the success
of its youngsters.
Equally important are
school / university partnerships and the coming together
of like - minded researchers and classroom teachers who recognize the fertile opportunity to research,
measure, and disseminate findings in Mind, Brain, and Education Science to enhance teacher
quality, student achievement, and professional satisfaction.
The
quality of our public
schools has been
measured in innumerable ways, and stakeholders may draw on any number
of sources for rankings to support a particular agenda.
Specifically, her research investigates effective ways to
measure bilingualism in
schools, the relevance
of knowledge on bilingualism and executive functions to language and literacy outcomes, and the relationship between academic outcomes and
quality and quantity
of bilingual experience.
But if we're unable to develop strong
measures of school quality that can be used remotely, the logical conclusion to be drawn is not that we ought to rely on them anyway.
Attitudes: support for diversity (racial integration), a perception
of inequity (that the public
schools provide a lower
quality education for low - income and minority kids), support for voluntary prayer in the
schools, support for greater parent influence, desire for smaller
schools, belief in what I call the «public
school ideology» (which
measures a normative attachment to public
schooling and its ideals), a belief in markets (that choice and competition are likely to make
schools more effective), and a concern that moral values are poorly taught in the public
schools.
Instead
of using reading and math tests as one useful tool, many reformers have made these results the defining
measure of school quality.
Of the elementary and middle schools the survey respondents rated, 14 percent received a grade of «A,» 41 percent received a «B» grade, while 36 percent received a «C.» Seven percent were given a «D» and 2 percent an «F.» These subjective ratings were compared with data on actual school quality as measured by the percentage of students in each school who achieved «proficiency» in math and reading on states» accountability exams during the 2007 - 08 school yea
Of the elementary and middle
schools the survey respondents rated, 14 percent received a grade
of «A,» 41 percent received a «B» grade, while 36 percent received a «C.» Seven percent were given a «D» and 2 percent an «F.» These subjective ratings were compared with data on actual school quality as measured by the percentage of students in each school who achieved «proficiency» in math and reading on states» accountability exams during the 2007 - 08 school yea
of «A,» 41 percent received a «B» grade, while 36 percent received a «C.» Seven percent were given a «D» and 2 percent an «F.» These subjective ratings were compared with data on actual
school quality as
measured by the percentage
of students in each school who achieved «proficiency» in math and reading on states» accountability exams during the 2007 - 08 school yea
of students in each
school who achieved «proficiency» in math and reading on states» accountability exams during the 2007 - 08
school year.
These «externalities» that make everyone better off provide still another reason for taking
measures that will enhance the
quality - not just the quantity -
of schooling.
I construct two
measures of school quality — student perceptions
of teacher practices and parent satisfaction — using data from the Longitudinal Study
of Young People in England (LSYPE), a major survey supported by the Department for Education.
My first set
of results demonstrates that inspector ratings are correlated with student - and parent - reported
measures of school quality, even after controlling for test - score results and other
school characteristics.
The study broadened the
measures of school quality beyond what policymakers envisioned.
My results confirm that lower inspection ratings are associated with sharply declining
school quality as
measured by student perceptions
of teacher practices.
That
measure of human capital, however, implicitly assumes that each additional year
of schooling translates into a comparable increment in the stock
of relevant skills, totally ignoring any variations in the
quality of the student's home, community,
school, teachers, and other factors.
This interpretation
of the law requires a minimum
of 8 different indicators (math achievement scores, reading achievement scores, another academic indicator, and a
school quality or student success indicator, plus participation rate for each
of these four
measures).
In terms
of schooling, one
of our
measures of worker
quality, the education levels
of nonteaching males in the public sector have not declined relative to the education levels
of other male workers.
First, using years
of school as a
measure of quality, it appears that the education level
of teachers has declined relative to the
schooling of other workers, no matter how skilled.
The debate over
school integration now requires discussion
of school accountability, parental choice, and
measures designed to enhance the
quality of the teacher workforce.
When asked which
measures would most likely improve social mobility and help disadvantaged young people get on in life, almost half
of respondents (47 per cent) chose «high -
quality teaching in comprehensive
schools», ahead
of two social mobility policies adopted by the main parties in the recent election.
A frequent metric, however misguided, for
measuring school quality is the amount
of money a district spends per pupil annually.
To sum up: 1) low - stakes tests appear to
measure something meaningful that shows up in long - run outcomes; 2) we don't know nearly as much about high - stakes exams and long - run outcomes; and 3) there doesn't seem to be a strong correlation between test - score gain and other
measures of quality at either the teacher or
school level.
REVIEW: Water Science for
Schools examines a wealth
of water topics such as water properties, how much water is there on earth and where, how water
quality and stream flow are
measured, the water and water - use cycles, national maps showing how water is used by state, surface and ground water, pesticides in ground water, aquifers, and glaciers and icecaps.
Responding to the need to look beyond test scores to
measure school quality, an increasing number
of school districts are striving to incorporate socio - emotional learning
measures in their accountability policies.
What
measures, whether in terms
of practice or policy, could help CMOs succeed at delivering more high -
quality schools at scale?
The researchers assessed teacher
quality by looking at value - added
measures of teacher impact on student test scores between the 2000 — 01 and 2008 — 09
school years.