Sentences with phrase «of minutes per goal»

Not exact matches

The One Verse Podcast will feature verse - by - verse expository teaching of Scripture, with a target goal (that will rarely be accomplished) of one verse per episode in five minutes or less.

The likes of giroud, kane and vardy last season, scored at a rate of about 160 minutes per non penalty goal in the PL.

The players listed below have bagged the most minutes per goal ratio in any of Europe's top divisions.

Their rate of 8.99 power play goals per 60 minutes more than doubles the Predators» 4.32 PP goals per 60.

Lukas Podolski has the best goal - per - minutes ratio of any of Arsenal's strikers this season, beating the likes of Alexis Sanchez, Olivier Giroud and Danny Welbeck.

One of the best scoring attacks in Europa on a minutes per goal ratio is Bas Dost from Wolfsburg.

The charts also reveal the percentage of possessions a player «ends,» either positively or negatively (DPoss %), field goal percentage on shots defended (OppFG %), ratio of free throw attempts generated per field goal attempt defended (OppFTA / FGA), defensive rebounds per 40 minutes (DRebs / 40), percentage of possessions on which turnovers are created (FTO %), and for the big men, a rim - protection stat that tracks field goal percentage when they're within five feet of the basket and the shooter is five or fewer feet away (RimProtect %).

Despite the time spent on the pitch it is in - fact Agüero that has scored more league goals, netting 14 times to Sánchez's 12, a rate of 1.17 goals per 90 minutes compared to a 0.64 strike rate from the Chilean.

Ospina did not disappoint, in his first season he took his chance when it came and played the second half of the season, his statistics were awesome, in PL Games per 90 minutes played, for every two goals ospina conceded, hart, de gea and courtois conceded three.

Ozil, with a LOT more games under his belt comes in at 465 minutes per goal, but massacres all the others in assists of course.

Goals conceded 0.61 per 90 minutes played in PL, equivalent of 23 goals in whole PL seGoals conceded 0.61 per 90 minutes played in PL, equivalent of 23 goals in whole PL segoals in whole PL season.

That works out as an average of a goal or assist every 49 minutes... Nearly two per game.

Last season, his first with Arsenal, Ozil created 71 goal scoring chances in just 25 league appearances — the equivalent of 2.84 - per - game or a chance every 29 minutes of play.

As the Czech has made 11 more league appearances than the Belgian since August 2015, clocking up over 1,000 more minutes of action, our analysis has been made on a per minute, per game and per goal conceded basis.

He's 23 and his goals per minute ratio is 99, which currently is bested only by Ronaldo, Messi, Neymar and Aguero of the top leagues.

So it is not surprise to see one of their players as the top flight's most lethal goalscorer when it comes to minutes per strike, not including penalties, with a minimum of five goals.

Doctrina, I have quoted this statistic many times on here but in the form of minutes played per non penalty goal.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

His overall score of 37.46 per 90 minutes is over THREE TIMES BIGGER than that of his closest rival Courtois, with 11.77 and that is because Ospina is either the best, or right up there, in all the categories that matter, such as saves per game, saves per goal, clean sheets, goals conceded, punches and catches completed.

Not just a great ratio of goals per minutes.

When broken down into minutes per goal excluding penalties, Lacazette found the back of the net every 134 minutes in a league considered far weaker than the Premier League.

Going on a 90 minute average, Ospina comes top or joint top in the key categories of saves per game, saves per goal, punches per game, catches per game and clean sheets, as well as the overall scores.

If you take number of goals in PL lexcluding penalties agains minutes played then the stats for vardy, kane and giroud are very similar, 170 to 180 minutes per goal.

It's the lack of goals which has left doubt in Arsenal fans mind as to his real ability, but his goal - per - minute ration has always been more than respectable, even if he has had the odd barren spell.

I could pull out stats to point out the stigma of his lack of goals is very misleading, considering his high shot accuracy, conversion rate and goals per minute but the most important aspect I would say is something which does not show up in stats... TENACITY!

His goal to game ratio with United was better than one in three but a lot of his games were as a sub and his goals per minute ratio is one of the best in Premier League history.

If your going to look at stats of strikers then goals per minute is a more important stat than anything else.

As well as that, it may surprise you to know that, with a rate of 0.7 a game, the former Montpellier man has scored more non-penalty goals per 90 minutes in the league than players like Thomas Muller, Cristiano Ronaldo and Antoine Griezmann, and he's not far off Lionel Messi's tally of 0.74 per game.

I did an analysis of minutes played per non penalty goal in the PL.

Perhaps the most surprising stat is goals; he is at 0.92 goals per 90 minutes at the moment, just behind Costa on 0.96 and miles ahead of the rest.

Sanchez get more goals and assist for arsenal in 3 years than 10 of walcott... and do nt start with that thay he is winger, alexis plays on the wing too... and trackback too, defends, create, and most importat, he wipe the f shirt while walcott is walking in the park taking a cup of tea... but yeah, «he has more goals per minute»... what an as **....

Despite playing up front for much of the season, Alexis has only averaged 0.41 goals per 90 minutes in the Champions League, according to Squawka.

The goal production rates of Giroud and Costa were actually very close (goals + assists per minutes played)-- Costa was not injured and played more minutes so he produced more in total numbers.

Although Sánchez's minutes per assist ratio is slightly down in contrast to his debut season in 2014/15 (368 to 389), his minutes per goal ratio has improved, now standing at an impressive average of 130 minutes for each of the three goals he has scored in the Premier League this season.

You see development doesn't always happen in a linear fashion and a lot of players develop at different times... It could be a 24 year old striker playing in Ligue 2 rapidly developing and rising to having one of the best goal per minute ratio in the premier league.

(Goals per minutes played, Goals per shots taken, etc.) But Wenger did not trust the other aspects of his game.

He has the most goals of any player per minute than any player.

the best ratio of goals per minute??

Either way, it will be hard to make up for Batshuayi's impressive scoring rate of 0.71 goals per 90 minutes in the Bundesliga.

As a dual - threat goal - and - assist man, Di María's rate of 0.8 per 90 minutes isn't at Neymar's or Messi's level (both around 1.3 to 1.4 goals or assists per 90), but few players are.

They've thrown money at the two biggest weaknesses from last year, and their attacking depth rivals any team in the world: Kevin De Bruyne had six goals and 18 assists last season; David Silva has lost his hair, but he has retained the vision that makes him one of the top final - third locksmiths on the continent; Leroy Sané's smooth movement makes it look like he's playing on a pool table whenever the ball is at his feet; Raheem Sterling is closer to superstardom than anyone's willing to admit; new signing Bernardo Silva can create chances from anywhere on the field; and Gabriel Jesus averaged 1.6 goals - plus - assists per 90 minutes as a 19 - year - old last season.

Last season his rate in La Liga of 1.01 goals per 90 minutes played was top class, but he started only 14 games and has yet to nail down a first - choice slot in any of his seasons as a pro.

His goals scored per minutes on the pitch record at Manchester United was impressive and came courtesy of some very clinical finishing off the bench; his role at West Ham will be a whole new challenge for him.

He also accumulated the best minutes - per - goal rate — 80 — of anyone scoring a minimum of 10 goals across Europe's top five leagues during 2015.

In terms of minutes per non-penalty goal, Giroud played 1,194 mins (5), whereas Lacazette played 2,411 mins (6).

In over 270 minutes played this season, Wheeler's allowing just short of a goal per 90 minutes, while Luis Barraza, who has played the last three matches, is letting in 1.66 per 90.

He's averaging 0.95 goals per 90 minutes in the Premier League and he's been responsible for 42 per cent of the goals Mauricio Pochettino «s men have scored.

That works out at an average of 96 minutes per goal or assist.

Averaging 156 minutes per goal, with a chance conversion rate of 22 % and a clear - cut chance conversion rate of 58 %, Lukaku is a threat in the finishing department, but the on - loan striker from Chelsea has also created 26 chances for Everton so far this season.

His xG per 90 minutes and xAssist per 90 minutes numbers are 0.45 and 0.08, which means that there is a 53 % chance of Sanchez contributing a goal if he plays all 90 minutes, down from 71 % probability he had when he was at Arsenal.