Do you think that, in criticizing certain expressions
of the modern evangelical movement for being political / anti-intellectual, some of us have simply become (as Mike said in a comment at the end of my post) «total snobs»?
In contrast, «the history
of modern evangelical interpretation exhibits a strong degree of discomfort with the tensions and ambiguities of Scripture,» says Enns.
The presentation is called «The Contours
of the Modern Evangelical Movement.»
Not exact matches
I don't like it when atheists want to secularize our culture and shut out any public mention
of religion... But I also don't like it when
modern evangelical fundamentalists are so ignorant
of the Christian Church's teachings and traditions
of two thousand years.
Evangelicals lack this clear tradition because, in part, they lack much
of a tradition overall, being mostly a
modern American movement that emerged out
of several Protestant traditions.
Whether in
evangelical, practical, or intellectual terms, the combination
of the three systems in one — the democratic republic, a creative and dynamic economy, and an open, free, and pluralistic culture — has a proven
modern record, surpassed by none,
of raising up the poor.
As the discussion
of the «
Evangelicals and Catholics Together» document has made clear, the theological agenda
of the Reformation remains
of continuing importance to
modern Christianity, particularly in the United States.
My hope is that as
evangelicals move beyond the
modern paradigm
of individual autonomy (particularly as it applies to biblical interpretation), we will begin to appreciate church tradition as an undeniable foundation for our faith.
It was a relief to find a believer who wrote a reasonable explanation
of the creation story that made more sense than I had ever read in
modern evangelical publcations.
Nevermind just the rhetoric
of war, I think there is a common refrain amongst
modern evangelicals that «God is on our side, so who can stand against us?»
Converted to an
evangelical brand
of Christianity while studying
Modern History at Oxford, Morris threw himself into the scriptures, was baptised in the Spirit and soon developed a teaching ministry.
A quarter
of both
evangelicals and black Protestants said they wouldn't mind if their church adjusted its traditional beliefs and practices, and a minority (8 %
of evangelicals, 13 %
of black Protestants) wanted their church to adopt
modern beliefs and practices.
I actually do a presentation when I seek to explain the
modern evangelical movement, particularly to movement leaders here in the United States or to missionaries who have been out
of the country for a long time.
Modern evangelical Protestantism has, because
of its populist tendencies, shown paradoxical signs
of strength and weakness.
Are you not a product
of your own
modern biases as I am a product
of fundamentalist -
evangelical hermeneuitics?
Holmes concludes the book by describing the beliefs
of modern presidents, from Dwight Eisenhower to George W. Bush, proving that since World War II the presidents have moved in a more orthodox and even
evangelical direction, which seems ironic considering the assumed rise
of secularity in America.
The educated
modern man needs no reminder how It has been
of the best to «just go along» with the
evangelical and his beliefs rather than suffer the wrath that might be so ordained against him by those who have carved out their virtuous beliefs from an age old written scripture.
What is commonly called the «
modern missionary movement» among the Protestants is the product
of pietistic and
evangelical movements
of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
But, today's
modern evangelical fundamentalists, going back to the days
of Abraham Vereide founding
of the religio - business - political cabal The Family / The Fellowship / C Street / National Prayer Breakfast, chooses to ignore Jesus» comments about his ministry and are bound and determined to have our government controlled by theocratic politicians who are passing laws to further their goal
of turning this country into an theocracy.
As cities boomed in late - nineteenth - century America,
Evangelicals discovered innovative ways to meet the overwhelming challenge
of modern cities.
The horrors
of the Holocaust — which were occurring during the same years the
modern evangelical movement was being born — also seared our conscience and deepened our sympathy for «God's chosen people.»
Claiming authority primarily as a «historian,» Lindsell adduces a string
of quotations to support his position and then devotes the larger and more controversial part
of his book to detailing the supposedly
modern declension from this stance in the Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod, among the Southern Baptists, at Fuller Theological Seminary, in the
Evangelical Covenant Church, and even among the members
of the ETS (the
Evangelical Theological Society, whose members are required to subscribe annually to a single statement — that «the Bible alone, and the Bible in its entirety, is the Word
of God written, and therefore inerrant in the autographs»).
For many
evangelicals, the Jewish people exited the stage
of history after the destruction
of the temple in a.d. 70 and only reemerged in the 1940s with the Holocaust and the birth
of modern Israel.
Many
evangelicals are beginning to grasp the fact, that certain ways
of reading the Scriptures and certain doctrines about the Scriptures may actually become the means
of oppression
of modern women by the imposition
of first century social patterns.
Fundamentalists and their more progressive
evangelical descendants have repeatedly adapted successfully to the conditions and opportunities
of modern life.
The result
of making the unmediated connection between ancient Hebrews and
modern Jews is that many
evangelicals are accidental Zionists.
More recently, the idea
of plausibility structures has been employed in several studies concerned with the question
of how American
evangelicals are able to maintain their traditional religious beliefs within the secular, pluralistic context
of modern culture.
Many
evangelicals share with process thinkers resistance to the fragmentation
of knowledge that characterizes the
modern university and the world in general.
The intramural dialogue over what Mark Noll has called «the scandal
of the
evangelical mind» worries that intellectually serious people have passed
evangelicals by while we were allured by the sensations
of revivalism, seduced by a materialistic market - driven culture, overtaken by the «disaster
of fundamentalism» in the face
of challenges from
modern science and technology, and robbed
of our universities through negligence and the inertia
of secularized education.
«2 The diversity which Henry, as one
of modern evangelicalism's founders, laments has been noted more positively by Richard Quebedeaux in his book The Young
Evangelicals - Revolution in Orthodoxy.3 In this book Quebedeaux offers a typology for the conservative wing
of the Protestant church, differentiating Separatist Fundamentalism (Bob Jones University, Carl McIntire) from Open Fundamentalism (Biola College, Hal Lindsey), Establishment Evangelicalism (Christianity Today, Billy Graham) from the New Evangelicalism (Fuller Theological Seminary, Mark Hatfield), and all
of these from the Charismatic Movement which cuts into orthodox, as well as ecumenical liberal and Roman Catholic constituencies.
Here we raise the question
of the precise relationship
of evangelicalism and fundamentalism as historical phenomena, I do not mean here to give any credence to what I predict will be the common
evangelical response to Barr — that he fails to distinguish appropriately a
modern enlightened evangelicalism from a more benighted fundamentalism.
The blog is ABOUT belied in the
modern world and is
of great interest to those who consider the American
evangelical community and certain other religious sects the source
of some serious
modern problems.
Modern evangelicals do need to «bridge the gap» and speak more plainly about their faith in terms that everyone can understand rather than assume that what they understand among themselves will be automatically understood by those who are not
of their community when they speak to others about their faith.
James Davison Hunter's researches detected among some
evangelicals a «shift... from the transcendent to the immanent,» a part
of a larger tendency to conform to «the cognitive and normative assumptions
of the
modern world view.»
While this statement may be less true in some forms
of evangelical worship, it is generally true
of all
modern church experience.
Many people think not; and to account for this slackening impulse in the highest and most complete
of human mystical beliefs they argue that the
evangelical flowering is ill - adapted to the critical and materialist climate
of the
modern world.
The
modern missionary movement
of the 18th and 19th centuries flowed in a direct powerful way out
of this
evangelical movement.
One hundred years after the Balfour Declaration,
evangelicals are divided on how the
modern state
of Israel should be viewed.
The Second Vatican Council, through its Pastoral Constitution, called for an intellectual development that synthesises science, personalism and other aspects
of modern culture with Church teaching, in a spirit
of respectful but
evangelical openness towards those outside the Church.
Old - line Christians may think that conservative
evangelicals do not fully appreciate the importance
of the philosophical tradition in undercutting belief in God's reality among thoughtful people in the
modern world.
For Noll, this reflects both American
evangelicals» ingenuity and skill with
modern technology and the amazing initiative
of third - world churches in distributing the film.
Those who take comfort in
evangelical dogmas are fleeing what Hedges terms our «Culture
of Despair» ¯ the social and economic conditions
of modern industrialized America.
If those
of us who are
evangelicals did that with an unconditional readiness to change whatever did not correspond with the scriptural revelation
of God's special concern for the poor and oppressed, we would unleash a new movement
of biblical social concern that would change the course
of modern history.
Some ugly and foolish thoughts expressed in slovenly language were put forth by President Ronald Reagan when, during a 1982 conference with some eastern Carribean leaders, he called Marxism a «virus»; when, in 1983, he labeled the Soviet Union an «evil empire,» telling the assembled National Association
of Evangelicals in Orlando, Florida, that communism «is the focus
of evil in the
modern world» and that «we are enjoined by Scripture and the Lord Jesus to oppose it with all our might»; and when, while conferring in 1984 with 19 conservative and religious leaders, he vowed to fight the «communist cancer.»
Well, if you believe 2000 year old speculation over
modern, evidence based, repeatable, testable science, then how would you react as President if some tragic event occurs and
evangelicals are telling you it's the end
of days?
As we have seen with some 81 percent
of evangelical Christians (including a number
of black clergy) supporting one
of the most racist presidential campaigns we have seen in
modern history, much
of American Christianity continues to specialize in leaving the minds
of black folk in the bondage
of the sunken place.
Ritual worship in general appears to the
modern transcendentalist, as well as to the ultra-puritanic type
of mind, as if addressed to a deity
of an almost absurdly childish character, taking delight in toy - shop furniture, tapers and tinsel, costume and mumbling and mummery, and finding his «glory» incomprehensibly enhanced thereby: — just as on the other hand the formless spaciousness
of pantheism appears quite empty to ritualistic natures, and the gaunt theism
of evangelical sects seems intolerably bald and chalky and bleak.
Pietism in Germany, the
evangelical efforts
of the Wesleys and Whitefield, and Jonathan Edwards as one
of the leaders
of the great awakening — these cultivated the fertile soil for the
modern Protestant missionary movement.
The
modern evangelical movement in America burst onto the public stage in the national election year
of 1976.
The sign said: «
Modern American Culture Museum
of the Oxford University Press: Tonight's Feature: A Journey into the
Evangelical Subculture
of America.»