Sentences with phrase «of money on»

That laid - back sensibility still exists, but there's also a ton of money on the line and a pretty important PGA Tour title up for grabs.

We have not successfully developed any youth player since Fabregas and RVP, we have spent a lot of money on good players such as Sanchez, Carzola and Ozil, but we are 6th, 33 points behind Mancity, out of the Fa, humiliated at the Carabao final, would be lucky to win the Europa, all our players (both homegrown and bought) are regressing and to sum it all up, we are playing shit.

Sure, you could gamble on boring things like the point spread or the game MVP — bets that can be based on stuff like «stats» and «logical reasoning» — but it's way more fun to risk large sums of money on the wholly unpredictable: the number of times the announcers say «12th Man,» the color of the postgame Gatorade shower, whether Michael Crabtree mentions Richard Sherman on Twitter.

We should only consider spending that amount of money on someone from the top bracket or if we can't get them then looking to sign a young prospect who is available for a decent price e.g. Janssen

It was not very long ago that the former Arsenal and France winger Robert Pires was talking about the need for Arsene Wenger to spend a lot of money on new players if the Gunners were to have any chance of claiming the next Premier League title, as reported by Sky Sports.

Rues would be my choice since the 40 million Bid for Sterling (Like i said would happen 3 weeks ago), If we have to spend that kind of money on a player it has to be him.

I can't see the point in spending such huge amounts of money on a player who is on par with Giroud.

UNLESS we're going to go drop a large pile of money on PSU BBall and get a guy who can recruit based on his name only.

Leicester have shown that a team can do very well in the Premier League without necessarily have to spent large sum of money on recruitment of costly players.

The good news for Washington fans is at least now they won't have spent a ton of money on a bust of a player, just a bust of a scheme.

Every game we play we want to win the game.This season will be very difficult because of the top clubs spending a lot of money on transfers, it's unbelievable.

By the afternoon, however, there had been a flood of money on Wenger staying and his price was reduced to 8/11 on to remain, and it was even money for him to refuse his new contract.

Manchester United on the other spend the same amount of money on only one of their targets, breaking the World Record fee for a football player.

However, I don't believe Wenger likes to spend a lot of money on defensive players, especially a defensive midfielder.

If that's true, there is no way in Hell Wenger will pay that kind of money on a defender.

Add to that the fact that we do not like Manchester United and that the Red Devils have been pretty poor since Sir Alex Ferguson left (and before to some extent) despite spending the sort of money on transfers and wages that a small country would be happy to have and you would think that we could easily dismiss the comments of the United midfielder Michael Carrick, especially as once played for our north London rivals Tottenham.

Personally, I wouldn't like us to spend that sort of money on Draxler, not because he isn't a very good footballer — which he is, not because he is a traditionally German style player — which he is.

Arsenal spent quite a lot of money on bringing the 29 year - old Lucas Perez into the squad at the end of the transfer window, and everybody (the fans anyway) thought that he was to be challenging Olivier Giroud for the central striker position, but it would appear we were all wrong!

I needed a bike suitable for racing 40 kilometers, but again, in the name of being cost - effective, I didn't want to drop a ton of money on a bike.

You can lose plenty of money on your punts if the key players of the football team you're backing don't make it to the starting line - up, owing to some injuries.

He paid that kind of money on Sanchez and Ozil, but will never pay on a defender like Ramos or even Hummels

Following the departure of Raheem Sterling to Manchester City for # 49million last week, the Reds, who finished sixth in the Premier League last season, have spent the majority of that money on Benteke and will he hoping he does a better job on Merseyside than that of club record signing Andy Carroll.

Also most of the players on the selling list are injury prone players, i do not see many clubs willing to take the chance, spending large sums of money on players who are only likely to last 5 matches.

You can argue that money talks, but then you've got to ask yourself whether or not you really wanted to blow a ton of money on a guy.

If Wenger leaves Kroenke will have to spend a lot of money on footballing knowledge, as Wenger covers too many footballing and non-footballing jobs.

These are cheap signing considering you spend equal amount of money on xhaka or pay 16 million to get welbeck.

In the final analysis you can not discount the impact of money on the competitiveness of teams in the EPL these days.

If I were a betting woman, I'd put a lot of money on the fact that Cena himself, rather than someone he's hired, is choosing the content.

The fact that Arsenal finally spend that amount of money on 1 player lifted the team's morale imo.

I can't speak to the exact calculus, but as is, it looks like the Astros were punished because the Cardinals spent a lot of money on Dexter Fowler.

We have also wasted time and a large amount of money on players like Walcott (who now says he's willing to play on the wings again, that's very generous of you Theo at 130 grand a week for two seasons doing F@ck all) and when we should have offloaded his when he wanted his money upped.

So, I am not sure if he will spend that kind of money on average striker in Europe.

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have him in our team any day, but just can't spend such «evil» amount of money on the guy.

Klopp's situation makes me respect Wenger even more BVB have only really sold 2 superstars well maybe 3 but they got Kagawa back (not that he was a superstar at Man U) but they've got a really strong squad and they've spend a lot of money on replacements for the likes of lewandowski.

Bettors are putting most of their money on Mayweather, and most boxers and experts doubt it, too.

Their investment has been all over the place since picking him up but for the most part they've spent a ton of money on fighters.

other clubs spending huge amount of money on classic players are not fools now..

I'm not going to be placing a lot of money on North Carolina and Tennessee making the Final Four, but consider them chaos place - holders.

Although most of the big clubs in European football are famed for spending huge amounts of money on players, since 2004 FC Porto have been making plenty on outgoing transfers.

i understand how Mayweather is entertaining this idea because of the money on the table, but i wish he would entertain the possibility of fighting Bud instead... now THAT fight will either be the biggest ass - whooping he'll receive or the most inspirational win he'll ever eke out.

Teams keep looking for hybrid offensive weapons, spending a lot of money on mediocre players (hello, Tavon Austin!)

I do see him spending a good amount of money on an attacker, you know wenger is an attack minded thinker that's where he wants to spend the money

I am so full with bs and negativity from Arsenal that i can see fans fum about Benzema and Wenger for spending that kind of money on him in the future.

You can waste a lot of money on players like Chambers, Perez, Gabriel etc if you have the wrong managers.

Meanwhile United were spending money for fun, Real and Barca spend that kind of money on just one player.

Twig, i agree we should always look in house before splashing a load of money on a new player.

«If you look at Chelsea, they spent a lot of money on a player like Diego Costa and he has settled really well and is scoring lots of goals, that has worked for them but it is not as easy for Arsenal.

He's too much like Chambers and we spent a crap load of money on him.

In addition City or Chelsea typically don't spend a ton of money on 27 year olds.

I think its both Wenger likes central midfielders so spent a lot of money on one and is being cheap in defence and up front.