Should we find one day that this god actually exists, I would hope that you would stand on the side
of the moral people and fight against such a god with whatever means available to us.
The idols
of moral people are not usually what we would consider evils; but a good for which we have an inordinate love, something intrinsically good that we love more that God.
Not exact matches
We can, and must, do something to expand opportunity for every young
person — not simply as a
moral imperative but out
of economic necessity and competitiveness.
These are indeed admirable qualities for a
person to have and, in some situations, displaying them will serve you well, but both research and history suggest that great leaders aren't always paragons
of unbending
moral correctness.
Famous
people evoke all sorts
of odd and perhaps extreme
moral judgments in us.
People operating within parameters
of truth, honesty, and
moral authority will listen to their heart and do the right thing, even when nobody is watching.
The youth appear uninterested in carrying any longer the burden
of national
moral responsibility for the evils
of the Third Reich, and the hard - working
people of Europe are disenchanted with the concept
of toiling to keep idle Greeks and Portuguese at the beach on their state benefits that began when they retired prematurely from unproductive state jobs.
Food banks, Saul argues, serve as a kind
of «
moral release valve» for government, permitting it to appear as if it were doing something about hunger when it's doing nothing to address the poverty and social isolation that lead
people to food banks in the first place.
They provide all
of us with a sense
of purpose and hope;
moral validation that we are needed and part
of something bigger than ourselves; comfort that we are not alone and a community is looking out for us; mentorship, guidance and personal development; a safety net; values, cultural norms and accountability; social gatherings, rituals and a way to meet new
people; and a way to pass time.
Not everyone agrees on what is noble, for example, and there have been atrocious acts
of history committed by
people who sincerely believed they were acting on a
moral ideal.
Given the huge number
of moral disagreements in the world, we should think twice about becoming the sort
of people who let such disagreements get in the way
of engaging in mutually beneficial trade.
I've had dealings since then with some
of the decision - makers behind the infamous attack ad that mocked Chrétien's facial paralysis; they are intelligent, reasonable and
moral people.
Researchers tested the impact
of fatigue on
moral resolve, finding that
people were more likely to lie the more tired they were.
This idea that we «deserve» to splurge on fancy meal after being thrifty for a week is called «
moral licensing,» and it undermines a lot
of people's plans for self - improvement.
People with
moral depth can feel the lack
of heart, the feeling
of «soullessness.»
David Brooks, an opinion writer for the New York Times, once said that to impact
people powerfully, leaders need to pursue the development
of moral depth.
We want our
people to have a great sense
of ethics,
morals and a sense
of responsibility to their community and team.
In a series
of controlled experiments, we asked participants, mostly average Americans in their 30s and 40s, to read about and evaluate the actions
of fictional
people who behaved in either a
moral or immoral way.
So, if a business relies on a brand to make money, the risk in any «
moral» position it takes on a social issue is exactly in proportion to the number
of people who might take the opposite view.
The
moral of the story here is this: Most investors, both everyday
people and professionals, lose to the market.
Most
people would also regard it as an example
of the residual problem
of the lender -
of - last - resort — «
moral hazard».
For some
people, it's against their
moral code to try to profit off
of something failing.
At a moment when the Republicans are talking about entitlement reform, and Ben Carson, the Secretary
of Housing and Urban Development, is proposing to triple the rents
of some
of the poorest
people in the country, the sight
of big banks reporting surges in profits that were fuelled by tax cuts raises alarming
moral questions.
And in my book on morality and getting these
people to grow up I again bring up the example
of 19th century industrialists who were incredibly rich and often rather cruel in their business lives who reinvented themselves, so a Carnegie whose business career certainly wasn't exemplary in any
moral sense.
«He's an egomaniac devoid
of all
moral sense» ---- said the society woman dressing for a charity bazaar, who dared not contemplate what means
of self - expression would be left to her and how she would impose her ostentation on her friends, if charity were not the all - excusing virtue ---- said the social worker who had found no aim in life and could generate no aim from within the sterility
of his soul, but basked in virtue and held an unearned respect from all, by grace
of his fingers on the wounds
of others ---- said the novelist who had nothing to say if the subject
of service and sacrifice were to be taken away from him, who sobbed in the hearing
of attentive thousands that he loved them and loved them and would they please love him a little in return ---- said the lady columnist who had just bought a country mansion because she wrote so tenderly about the little
people ---- said all the little
people who wanted to hear
of love, the great love, the unfastidious love, the love that embraced everything, forgave everything, and permitted everything ---- said every second - hander who could not exist except as a leech on the souls
of others.»
«I've been
of the opinion that we should have a very big focus on developing alternatives, because alternatives would make it easier for
people — would facilitate — the
moral reasoning and the compassion.»
You only need to read the headlines to see the ethical and
moral breaches in all walks
of life (and that goes for scientists who who fudge figures as well as business
people who fudge balance sheets).
In a particularly disturbing passage in the Casey opinion, the three deciding justices deliberately adopted the role
of moral prophecy for a stubborn and recalcitrant
people.
They managed to deliver tax breaks for the rich and oil companies, that's indisputable, but not on any
of the «
moral» issues they've used since the early 70s to get votes from religious
people.
Use the bible for what it was intended,
moral stories
of how
people should act, although current societal norms would certainly preclude stoning and other current justice and civil rights departures from the rigid teachings / interpretations
of the bible.
The only
people destroying the
moral fiber
of this country are all the religious
people who judge others without knowing them.
Any «inspired» bible a work
of men, reflecting the
morals and knowledge
of ancient
people.
Political Life and Human Dignity Mary Ann Glendon («The Bearable Lightness
of Dignity,» May) is right on target in noting that within the Christian tradition, dignity has a twofold meaning: «In its ontological sense it is a given attribute
of the
person, while, in its
moral sense, it is a call to an end to be gradually realized.»
Some
people need more than just be
moral for the sake
of being
moral they need a purpose for it.
First,
people often kill other human beings because they believe that the creator
of the universe wants them to do it... Second, far greater numbers
of people fall into conflict with one another because they define their
moral com.munity on the basis
of their religious affiliation...»
all you have to do is write a book and tell
people god told you to write it instead
of just telling everyone himself (lazy) then you can be a cults
moral compass
In short, I consider this «reality» show as must see TV which attempts to convince non-Muslim viewers
of Muslim self - importance,
moral superiority, and feigned persecution with every condescending word uttered by these hypocritical, duplicitous
people.
They somehow see us as having no
morals, instead
of people that do not need religion to be
moral.
These ideas were the legends
of ignorant
people in our deep rooted past so help the living and to provide leadership to show
people their
morals.
You accuse Christians
of being brainless and nasty, but most
of the posts I've seen are from
people who can't say enough to degrade and discredit others who take a
moral stand on life, politics or whatever.
The stories
of players in these accounts challenge our
moral imagination by forcing us to recognize that the uniformed men on the field are not just Football Players, but
Persons - brothers, fathers, husbands, and sons like me.
James Bradley Thayer warned nearly a century ago that «common and easy resort» to judicial review would tend «to dwarf the political capacity
of the
people, and to deaden its sense
of moral responsibility.»
I prayed that a Republican would say something so ridiculously foul and ignorant that nobody with even half a brain or an ounce
of moral character could possibly vote for them but that lots
of people would show how stupid they truly are and vote for him anyway.
If you want to keep
people focused on your religion as a unifying set
of moral and practical codes to live by, make attendence to religious services and taking the day off work to attend mandatory or else it is a sin punishable by death.
Academic
moral theory, like preaching, «stiffens the backbone»
of one's coreligionists (or co «ideologues) by «convincing
people who think like you that they are not alone in their beliefs [and] have the backing
of someone who is confident, competent, articulate, and thoughtful.»
This is one
of the biggest lies religious
people spew is the false connection between religion and «
morals».
Societyvs, As for gay
people — the only thing you think they are destroying is the sanctity
of marriage --------- Oh no, they are destroying themselves and the
moral fabric
of my nation, too.
I don't see how I'm less
moral of a
person because I'm not one
of you.
As the 1986 Vatican «Letter to the Bishops
of the Catholic Church on the Pastoral Care
of Homosexual
Persons» stated, the homosexual inclination is «ordered toward an intrinsic
moral evil» and is therefore an «objective disorder.»
You know the sort
of person I mean — those
people more interested in an opportunity to assert their own
moral superiority than in what either the blogger or the cited author has to say.