Along the same lines, Sapontzis argues that animals» intentional and sincere, kind and courageous actions are moral actions, for they accord with accepted moral norms, and we do not require demonstrations
of moral principle in everyday human moral practice (AAMB 51 - 2).
Most religions locate the source
of these moral principles in god.
Not exact matches
A polemicist might well have salty things to say about this abdication
of moral principles that Christians have held since the earliest days
of the faith, but
in Wilcox's mild and irenic diction the mainline churches are simply «accommodationist,» espousing what he calls a «Golden Rule Christianity» that honors tolerance, kindness, and social justice as paramount virtues.
«It is through the humanities principally,» says Coughlin, president
of Gonzaga University from 1974 to 1996, «that the culture, values, and
moral principles of the Judeo - Christian tradition are kept alive
in Western society.
We all are creatures
of mingled good and evil; and, good institutions neglected and ancient
moral principles ignored, the evil
in us tends to predominate.
The FIRST
PRINCIPLES SEMINAR:
MORAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
IN THE NATURAL LAW TRADITION is an intensive two - week program for advanced undergraduate and graduate students under the direction
of Thomas D'Andrea (University
of Cambridge) and Christopher Tollefsen (University
of South Carolina), with guest lecturers Hadley Arkes (Amherst College), Robert George (Princeton University) and Daniel Robinson (Oxford University).
The author, professor
of systematic theology at St. John's Seminary
in Brighton, Massachusetts, does a splendid job
of introducing the series, addressing such topics as natural law,
principles of human action, the determination
of the
moral good, and the connection between virtues, gifts
of the Holy Spirit, and the Beatitudes.
Although the machines involved are extraordinarily dangerous, the
moral principle governing their use is perfectly ordinary: It is the familiar one that human beings should engage
in an activity that poses dangers to others only if,
in the totality
of the circumstances, doing so is reasonable» i.e., if the good to be achieved, taking account
of the probability
of success, is proportionate to the possible ill effects.
Nat privileged me by asking me to introduce him at that event, where I lauded him as «a superb writer and first - class public intellectual,... a man
of consistent, steadfast
principle; a
moral purist
in an age
of hand - wringing accommodationists.»
Wary
of the dangers that radical subjectivism and
moral fanaticism pose for social solidarity and cultural coexistence, he urges us to practice humility, civility, and humor
in our political dealings while holding fast to core
principles such as individual freedom and human rights.
As someone
in his late 40s (I literally ride the line between being a baby boomer and the oldest
of the Gen - X crowd), I can appreciate much
of what is said
in the article, except that instead
of the church being old - fashioned, I tend to see it as the church adhering to established sound doctrine and
moral principles.
You can theorize all day long that we have other rules and laws... but for my
moral guide
in this life... Jesus
principle of love will do just fine.
If, however, it is proposed not as a preference but as a
principle, it gravely distorts
moral deliberation about the use
of force
in the service
of justice.
Underlying this erroneous tendency, as Faith has pointed out many times over the last forty years, is the implicit or explicit denial
of the transcendence
of God, the Divinity
of Christ, the historical objectivity
of revelation and the authority
of the Church
in matters
of faith and
morals, and also the denial
of the spiritual soul as a
principle of existence that is distinct from yet integrates the material within the unity
of our human nature.
But the Americans
of the U.S. accomplished both these things, and
in the cleverest way imaginable — calmly, legally, philanthropically, without bloodshed and, so far as the world could see, without violating a single great
moral principle.
Many moralists speak
of love as the one fundamental and universal
moral principle, the golden rule honored
in all traditions.
Aristotle wrote that the criterion
of good
moral action is not a
principle or a law so much as «the man
of practical wisdom» ¯ that is, the person
in your environment who habitually makes the wisest and bravest decisions
of anyone else you know.
According to this understanding, the role
of religion
in political debate is not so much to supply these norms, as if they could not be known by non-believers — still less to propose concrete political solutions, which would lie altogether outside the competence
of religion — but rather to help purify and shed light upon the application
of reason to the discovery
of objective
moral principles.
For life within the Catholic Church, the stumbling - block as regards change
in the Church's doctrine is not so much the question
of defined dogmas as other doctrines
of the Church
in dogmatic and
moral theology which are taught authoritatively but which
in principle can not count as defined doctrines
of faith or as irreformable dogma.
«35 Whitehead's position here opposes several strains
of thought combined
in traditional theism: the divine Caesars that lead to fashioning God
in the image
of an imperial ruler; the Hebrew prophets that lead to fashioning God
in the image
of moral energy; and Aristotle's «unmoved mover» that leads to the fashioning
of God
in the image
of an ultimate metaphysical
principle.
In this connection it must be clearly realized from the start that the belief
of the Church, the object
of its teaching office, contains both statements about divine realities such as the blessed Trinity, the Incarnation
of the Logos, grace, redemption etc., and equally clear and equally obligatory statements about man's correct
moral principles.
Normally
in such cases he can only change with the Church's whole consciousness
of its belief, if such a change really takes place
in respect
of a more precise discernment
of the fundamental
moral guiding
principles or
of certain applications
of these to new situations.
In last fall's presidential election pro-life voters were faced with a difficult moral choice emblematic of the politics of abortion in general: Does moral principle demand a vote for a marginally pro-life candidate with a chance of winning, or does it demand a vote for a completely pro-life..
In last fall's presidential election pro-life voters were faced with a difficult
moral choice emblematic
of the politics
of abortion
in general: Does moral principle demand a vote for a marginally pro-life candidate with a chance of winning, or does it demand a vote for a completely pro-life..
in general: Does
moral principle demand a vote for a marginally pro-life candidate with a chance
of winning, or does it demand a vote for a completely pro-life....
What the Girl Scouts decided was that if the girl
in question believed
in something that allowed for the same traditional Scouting function
of religious education — religious and spiritual self - cultivation based on the
principle of a
moral order
of which the Scout can be a part — she could substitute her preferred name for that instead
of using the word «God.»
The Church will not, for example, be able to baptize an African chieftain who wants to keep his harem; yet she may,
in certain circumstances, judge that he has a subjectively good conscience (though he has heard the message
of the gospel and is willing
in principle to believe
in it), because
in his actual social and human circumstances he can not yet realize the
moral demand
of monogamy, as little as formerly king David and king Solomon.
In the case of the individual living bona fide in invincible error, moral theologians have worked out useful principles which make life easier regarding the practice of the confessional, admission to the sacraments and so fort
In the case
of the individual living bona fide
in invincible error, moral theologians have worked out useful principles which make life easier regarding the practice of the confessional, admission to the sacraments and so fort
in invincible error,
moral theologians have worked out useful
principles which make life easier regarding the practice
of the confessional, admission to the sacraments and so forth.
Only someone who overlooks the fact that this answer itself has a real history which is a history
of the reality reflected on as well as
of the reflection itself, can think that the Church with its
principles, because they too can be given concrete form, is always able to follow directly on the heels
of what is new
in the changing course
of history and that only by its own fault and failure could the Church lag behind events
in its theological reflection on
morals.
For that reason the Church teaches
moral maxims with specific content to be observed by the faithful
in every case where the inner structure
of reality to which these
principles apply is actually present and where this presence is recognized by the Christian.
I have pursued an outline
of formative human rights
in order to argue programmatically that a
moral and political theory backed by neoclassical metaphysics may be understood to prescribe the universal
principle of communicative respect as an indirect application
of a comprehensive telos.
ATR did not make political and economic life accountable, spiritual and
moral in conformity to
principles of God's governance.
These arguments present a special challenge to neoclassical metaphysics because they are advanced by those who,
in a time when relativism
in some form or other seems to be ascendant, share the affirmation
of a universal
moral principle or
principles.
Just because it is meta - ethical, this
principle itself presupposes another or supreme
moral principle, and I will subsequently argue that the universal set
of tights
in question is an indirect application
of the teleology backed by neoclassical metaphysics.
As McBrien noted, this powerfully suggests the need to be attentive to justice issues within as well as outside the church This
principle of sacramentality undergirds the statement
in the U.S. Catholic bishops» pastoral letter Economic Justice for All: «All the
moral principles that govern the just operation
of any economic endeavor apply to the church and its agencies and institutions; indeed the church should be exemplary» (no. 347).
Indeed
in [E], the history
of ancient thought is overviewed and perceived as having presented God
in the image
of an imperial ruler (Christian theology), a personification
of moral energy (Hebrew thought) and an ultimate philosophical
principle (Greek thought).
But, then, any such theory is fallacious because it implicitly asserts that alternatives
in respects other than those marked by the nonteleological
principle are morally indifferent, and that assertion is a
moral evaluation
of the alternatives
in those other respects.
Indeed, ad hoc engagements
in discourse always presuppose this widest possible discourse because any argument about the validity
of social prescriptions is potentially an argument about the most general
moral principles and thus about social action generally.
Assuming that this statement
of principles for a conception
of human rights backed by neoclassical metaphysics can be given a detailed formulation and defense, we may repeat that a
moral and political theory
of this kind is the more important because the alternative it offers is largely neglected
in the contemporary discussion.
The
principle constituting this universal social practice is itself meta - ethical,
in the following sense: the social action prescribed is explicitly neutral to all
moral disagreement.4 On the face
of it, one might object, a prescription
of universal rights can not be explicitly neutral to all such disagreement because it is not explicitly neutral to disagreement about the
principle itself.
Following Apel, I will use the term «communicative rights» to designate the formative rights that belong to all humans as potential participants
in moral discourse, and I will call the formative
principle in question the
principle of communicative respect.
As a derivation from the meta - ethical character
of every claim to
moral validity, the specific practice
of moral discourse both implies and is implied by — and,
in that sense, belongs to — a
principle that constitutes social action universally.
Ethics entails critical reflection on the social dimensions
of moral behavior, the constitution
of meaning by both the individual and the group, the identification
of values underlying
moral action, the use
of warrants
in grounding these values, the operation
of norms and
principles in a changing and diversified world and similar issues.
Such values, while not all present at every point
of Old Testament morality, do
in fact underlie the bulk
of the
moral norms and
principles we find there.
Because we can not directly observe the behavior
of biblical people or interview them about their
moral values and
principles, it is all the more important to study the biblical forms
of moral discourse — the many ways
in which these values and judgments are expressed.
Although space will not permit exploration
of the point here, it is important to note that Christian thought about just war predated the rise
of the modern state system
in the 17th century, and rests on fundamental
moral principles not essentially tied to that system.
Bargaining and barter were and are known
in all the cultures that have developed
moral and religious traditions, most
of which have well - known maxims and
principles that deal with the vast spectrum
of social and
moral issues, from fair weight to marriage contracts, bred
in the marketplace.
Immanuel Kant, «The Metaphysical
Principles of Virtue,»
in The Metaphysics
of Morals (Indianapolis: Bobbs - Merrill, 1964), p. 135.
Nothing is good for Kant except a «good will,» nor does he ever seriously envisage the possibility
of turning to the good with the «evil impulse»
in such a way as to unify impulse and will (Immanuel Kant, Fundamental
Principles of the Metaphysic
of Morals, trans.
It begins where women
in theology attempt to deconstruct basic ethical
principles such as «the common good» and «the question
of moral power and authority,» but from there it moves to the creative impulses we see around us, as women
in faith and faithfulness reconstruct the future image and face
of the Church as a «community
of Christ, bought with a price, where everyone is welcome, «14 as Letty Russell describes it.
The Church's role consists
in enunciating clearly the
principles,
in forming the consciences
of men and
in insisting on the
moral exercise
of just war.
In another editorial he argues that the church should promote such concrete programs as Social Security, Medicare, the Jobs Corps, and the massive attack on the intolerable slums of our great cities.35 These are concrete applications of Scripture's moral principles, viewed in light of contemporary social and economic realit
In another editorial he argues that the church should promote such concrete programs as Social Security, Medicare, the Jobs Corps, and the massive attack on the intolerable slums
of our great cities.35 These are concrete applications
of Scripture's
moral principles, viewed
in light of contemporary social and economic realit
in light
of contemporary social and economic reality.