All four movies start off as if they intend to be just as scary as the novel but then wind up simplifying the issues, either by letting a doomed sympathetic character survive (as in Cruel Intentions) or by sentimentalizing the motives or the fates
of the more evil characters (as in the other three movies).
I think the love of power is often a root
of more evil than the love of money....
Not exact matches
«By shifting to a
more collaborative work environment, the knowledge industry has opened a veritable Pandora's box, full
of countless interruptions, distractions and other
evils,» wrote Jonathan B. Spira, an analyst with Basex, a New York — based research firm.
The company told investors in 2012 it was built to «make the world
more open and connected,» and way back in 2004 Google famously said its first rule
of business was «don't be
evil.»
I am one
of those who think like Nobel, that humanity will draw
more good than
evil from new discoveries.
Same thing IMHO with Google's unofficial «Do No
Evil» motto — a perfect example
of the law
of inverse relevance: the less you intend to do about something, the
more you have to keep talking about it.
Now that Dr.
Evil is out
of the White House, he said he'll be promoting a new book: «Fire and Fury and Also
Evil and
More Fire and Also Magma Too» — a spoof on the book «Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House» by Michael Wolff.
What Hitchens wrote about the
evils of religion was not so much a scholarly argument, but
more a wave
of righteous indignation that levelled everything in its path.
Stone reminds us that violence is not always, absolutely
evil, concluding that «the transformation
of the motive» toward an increasingly virtuous object reframes the story, making the violence
more «meaningful, if not fully justified.»
It makes me very nervous that Islam today finds
more and
more acceptance in the Western World though it is clear that it is a religion
of war,
evil, destruction, death, sorrow, torture, pain, doom, darkness, backwardness, hatred, revenge, bossiness, etc..
= > There is no necessity for the flood story to be anything
more than a massive collection
of spiritual truths that explain relationship between God and man, good and
evil, life and death all in accordance with the plan
of creation for the salvation
of souls.
I have been called «un-American», «traitor», «monster», «
evil», «devil», «child - rapist», «devil - worshiper», and so many
more lovely things by your religion
of love.
Or do you want to make an example
of me, as the «
evil Christian» with Sabio (much
more Jesus - like) hovering over to make sure you hit the right note
of bitterness?
The older I get — and against the nerve
of Strauss's dogma — I think
more and
more of Locke as a mixture
of good and
evil implicit in the idea
of Christian heretic.
Any way those were picks
of verses from different sura's... I know they look long but they are not once you have read them you would want to read
more... It is the
evil in man who makes them to look as long or non understandable to read... or would even make you feel like sick...!
All this and that ban on christian act
of services is the way
of continuity in
more evil.
He deepens this insistency in the Ethics and ties his argument explicitly to the sin
of political or public overcoming that requires a norm
of shamelessness in order for it to do its dirty work, dirty no
more, or so is the claim, because the ruthless deed - doers know no
evil.
Do you need
more proof, look up maculy martin, or john corapi,
evil is here and it is evading you radar, the church is the testament
of the covenant to Jesus.
@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location
of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king
of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.
More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their
evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence
of God in any way.No one that i am aware
of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day
more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.
And I do think there is an element
of hope in the crusade's demonstration that moral appeal and censure can affect a behavior so widespread, although goodness knows there are
evils much
more in need
of our moral attention.
He's really
more of a humanist, because he sees good and
evil in the universe working through people.
39:32 — Then, who does
more wrong than one who utters a lie against Allah, and denies the truth [this Quran, the Prophet (Muhammad SAW, and Jesus the Son
of Marry), the Islamic Monotheism, the Resurrection and the reward or punishment according to good or
evil deeds] when it comes to him!
For many years I believed, like you, that it was a matter
of whether I did
more good than
evil to be saved... until I discovered otherwise.
using your argument we would had civil rights in this country just because goverments make certain practices illegal does tat mean that what the goverrmet s doing is moral and just, The fact s the goverment attempted to use Christaniaity to bolster it claim to power through this we have the start
of the Roman Catholic Church one
of the most insidious
evil organzations on this planet which as doe
more to oppose ad kill true follewers
of Christ then ay group o this planet.
And if I thought otherwise I was rebellious,
more than likely demon possessed, and if I had any plans
of «going to heaven'then I needed to repent
of my
evil questioning thoughts and return to the «church».
In recent years, some
more candid evangelical Protestants have decried the «hypocrisy»
of preachers who are silent about the
evil of divorce, in many cases because they are themselves divorced.
If you believe in God / Christ, then you have peace that no
more suffering, pain, death, bickering among humans, corruption, death, and all
of mankinds
evil deeds, etc. etc. will exist when you exit this earth.
More inflammatory garbage from Baden, this time blaming the Bible for man's cruelty to each other, and ignoring the actual source and consequences
of evil, falsehoods, and deception.
So we're cleaner but we're also doing so much
more evil as a collective you could look at a society
of apes and might actually find it
more beautiful than some disgusting ones that are around now.
In Charleston, South Carolina, when those innocent people were shot during a bible study, the eloquence
of their difficult words, «I forgive you,» spoke
more directly to defeat the
evil perpetrated by a tortured man than did the ensuing media firestorm which brought down one Confederate flag.
By contrast, one - time American presidential aspirant Alfred E. Smith offered a different diagnosis: «the cure for the
evils of democracy is
more democracy.»
When American Forces bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki they did so not out
of evil, malicious intent, but instead they took in the ENTIRE picture, realizing that in spite
of their horrific brutality many
more lives would be spared in the long run.
What motivated these German anti-Nazis to resist the powerful Hitler regime is an important object lesson for
more precisely locating the roots
of the moral
evil of Nazism by understanding the source
of its antitheses (malum privatio boni est).
When
evil rules the majority, then those laws will gradually be changed so that behavior gradually becomes
more inclined to selfish gratification at the expense
of others, wickedness then becomes expected, then it becomes normal, then it becomes the law.
That said: «But god did not foresee — that man would want a companion» = > «It is not good for the man to be alone» are the words used — so God did know and provided «that the snake would talk to the humans» = > «the serpent was
more crafty than any other animal» - deception required capacity to deceive «that the humans would choose knowledge (and why else was that tree there)» = > It was not knowledge but knowledge
of good and
evil.
Such is the self - perpetuating and insidious nature
of evil, breeding
more deception and alienation from God along the way, and Ms Lamott's musings are a symptom and confirmation
of that truth.
In fact, Niebuhr taught that the egotism
of the individual only becomes
more powerful when collected into a group, to the extent that an individual's egotistical will - to - live takes on the
more evil will - to - power, that is, coercion becomes the modus - operendi
of the group.
However, in our Jewish tradition, the possibility
of return — teshuvah — turning away from
evil to come back to a
more primordial source
of good, can not be denied to any person or to any people on earth.
«Isn't the simplest touch
of a child's arm on the face
more important, isn't the good meal, the brush against a thigh, a hand held during a movie, a swim in the sea, aren't those things
of equal importance as the sands
of time come rushing down on our heads burying ambition and love, good and
evil, breath, blood, brains, waste, memory, alike in the oblivion?»
When we lose faith in the essential goodness
of life and our own humanity, seeing that which we judge «
evil» to be
more prevalent than that which we judge to be «good», then we have lost faith in either the goodness or the power
of God to sustain that goodness and our God has become too small or just another Baal, a false god
of our own vain imaginings, a projection
of our own finite limitations and disordered desires.
This is the same insight which, at a
more abstract level, Whitehead identified under the name
of Adventure: even the good when merely repeated becomes relative
evil to be surpassed.
there are no words or science that can counter the perpetration
of Satanic
evil, like the truth
of the Spirit that brings life
more abundantly.
I often ask my wife if what i did or said was
evil and i
more often then not get «yes» so as i said before, i believe its a matter
of perspective
of those involved and the society it takes place in — but now in the modern day where your actions are on youtube in a seconds notice — the world is the final judge... and that does» t bode well for the U.S.
I wonder if the suffering and
evil in this world and the glory
of God are tensions lived in
more than expectations realized?
For instance, a character may change from good to
evil (or the reverse), become disillusioned, survive a series
of tests, or prove to be
more admirable in a crisis than anyone could have believed.
In God, Power and
Evil, Griffin mentions two
more criticisms
of a free - will defense which affirms (16) and thus (14).
But over the last 25 years we have gotten much
more clarity about the role
of evil in the context
of abuse.
(I wonder why we don't talk
more about some
of the successful programs in this country which have been 100 % effective in stopping this sort
of evil.)
There will surely be occasions on which the state must intervene in the life
of families in order to protect children, but it is
more likely to be effective in acting against manifest
evils than in positively restructuring families.
A god who chooses people for eternal literal fire (Romans 9) and causing / allowing
evil (rape, torture, child abuse, etc) means he looks
more like Molech than the God
of love revealed in Jesus.