Sentences with phrase «of much debate with»

The true identity of her Friends spirit animal has been a subject of much debate with her best friend, Lola Frears, the daughter of Florence Foster Jenkins» director Stephen Frears.

Not exact matches

The amount of «cord cutting» behavior remains a topic of heated debate, with Comcast saying it hasn't seen much evidence of it occurring so far.
Successful brainstorms incorporate a diverse group of people collaborating with one another and contributing as much as possible without any arguments, debates or snap decisions on their merit.
On the outsourcing debate, Cook has previously said Apple would not be able to shift much of its manufacturing back to the United States because of a lack of workers with the proper skills.
The PSOE's party elders did not choose him for this role, but if Pedro Sánchez takes the lead, in Europe as much as in Spain, and reopens the debate about the euro, acknowledging that the current structure does not work and defining with the help of hindsight what vulnerabilities must be addressed in a reformed European Union, the party's new leader can halt the decline of the PSOE at home and reverse the ugly nationalism spreading through Europe.
Instead of running ads, they would define Scheer more slowly, over time, with a series of forced choices in Parliament, through government motions, much as opposition parties usually seek to define governments (you'll note that «define» in Ottawa politics is almost always pejorative by implication) through clever use of their occasional opportunity to define a day's parliamentary debate through so - called «supply motions.»
A paper co-authored by University of Ottawa Professor Michael Wolfson, one of Canada's top researchers on income and equality issues, said there was much debate of Ottawa's new program this year allowing some income splitting for couples with children, but most people don't realize income splitting has long existed for thousands of professionals such as doctors and lawyers who have been able to funnel their incomes through private companies they create to hold their income.
But with Nvidia shares an incredible 1,000 percent in just three years, the debate rages on among analysts of just how much upside the stock has...
There's a growing debate as to how much of the buyer's journey your prospects actually conduct before talking with a salesperson.
His apparent assumption that the debate is over — «Vehicles that we're producing are capable of full autonomy,» he said — is a little scary, considering how much still needs to be learned about the functioning of fully autonomous cars, and about the interaction of autonomous systems with humans in the cockpit.
Come on, I have had debates with Atheist but I have also had to pretty much break up potential fights between two persons of Faith over an interpretation of a scripture.
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
TforT, Not much of a reason to debate with you; it will just be circular, but I will respond to 2 of your post to me.
A coherent philosophy of the human person, clearly expressed and debated, will yield much fruit, not least in a greater understanding with Muslims of good will and pure heart, of whom there are many - Peace be upon them!
With its Marxist sheen dulled, much of this debate has ceased to be about class divisions (although it retains that edge in certain thinkers) and more so about mentalités — mindsets or common outlooks — that comprise the beliefs inhabiting the social imaginary.
To return to the earlier parable, ideas do not much matter if they are held or being debated by men whose investment in them is as remote as that of the man high on the cliff who idly speculates about the options available to men threatened with drowning.
Regardless of one's interpretation of this much - debated and reimagined text (which makes a bit more sense in its ancient Near Eastern context), the story of Abraham's binding of Isaac should unsettle every parent and every person with a conscience.
2) name usage statistics do not guarantee the miraculous — but they certainly place an author in that immediate context (or at the very least, with direct access to someone who was from that immediate context), which is a MAJOR contingency that has been much debated in the question of authorship... which IS the topic you raised.
The current language debate is just one more indicator of how much the church lost when it got caught up in the philosophical / theological Christology debates, and replaced the name of Jesus with the titles Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
Similar issues arise with the much - debated issue of homosexuality.
Look... you come in and post with a clear air of superiority all the while rambling almost incoherently and call us trolls when we seek to debate you... I hope don't expect much consideration for such silly nonsense.
The upshot is the suppression of political debate about the common good, which is why thorough - going libertarians are such a destructive force in our political culture, perhaps as much so as contemporary liberals whose main vice is the serene smugness that assumes that all we have left is administration because everybody worth talking to already agrees with them about first principles.
From a finite set of particular observations one can not derive a universal generalization with certainty (the much debated logic of induction can provide no inferential grounds for making assertions about all cases when only a particular group of cases has been examined).
Says he: «When both Judaism and Christianity acknowledge that it is fundamentally one religion, one faith, and do not deny it, as still happens so much either out of ignorance or out of dogmatic prejudices — then they can really debate with each other.»
Man makes so much of himself that with his finite mind he tries to debate an infinite God.
You make it much easier to pick which side of the debate to join with your unwitty responses and even less witty ideology.
However, in our opinion, and here we would include Hans Urs von Balthasar, these thinkers bear too much of a Hegelian flavour to be truly consistent with Catholic tradition - notwithstanding de Lubac's outstanding contributions to the nature - grace debate.
Thus, Griffin, McHenry, and Cobb can debate the panpsychism issue with Ford, and among themselves, without having to fear that their respective interpretations of Whitehead's metaphysics — interpretations on which ride much of their respective philosophies or theologies — will be found wanting in any important respect.
He taught theology at the (Reformed) University of Leiden, and engaged in ongoing debate with his theological colleagues there, much of it adversarial.
It is often tacitly assumed without much debate that Whitehead's metaphysics constitutes a species of process philosophy compatible in the main with older varieties of process metaphysics inspired by various evolutionist theories.
Too much debate about scriptural authority has had the form of people hitting one another with locked suitcases.
My goal with that series is to reconstruct much of what I've deconstructed in the past, to celebrate equality rather than debate complementarianism.
you are maximizing your chances of getting your point across — not so much to the relevant person you are debating with — but to the 1000s of open minded people who read this site.
It was an appropriate conclusion to a genial evening in which the Catholic side, while largely failing to engage directly with opposing arguments, presented its vision much more coherently than in the Intelligence Squared debate of last November.
What strikes me on rereading that exchange is how much their debate hinged on a proper interpretation of Milton, with Fish insisting on the same views now developed at fuller length in How Milton Works, and Neuhaus insisting that Milton would agree with his own assertion that «one's decision for a «first premise» is a reasoned decision.»
The series will combine «religious and spiritual debate» with «personal stories of self - discovery,» the BBC said, with the physical challenge proving too much for some.
These tender vegan banana chocolate chip muffins are studded with rich chocolate chips, crunchy walnuts, and flavored with a hint of cinnamon.I've spent way too much time debating whether or not to post this one.
«For now, the Bear vs. Saban is not much of a debate among the fan base, with Paul Bryant still holding the lead (longevity, tenure, SEC titles, national championships, impact on the game),» said Evans.
There has already been a lot of debate about how much the Spaniard brings to the table for Arsenal and how much his absence has hurt the team and their efforts to claim a major trophy like the EPL title but another question connected with that is how much losing Cazorla affects the other main creative star in our side, Mesut Ozil.
Following Man United's last gasp equaliser against equaliser against West Ham last weekend, the style of the goal casued much debate with Sam Allardyce describing the Red Devils as a «long ball» team.
The price tag was met with much debate as the majority of fans pointed out that whilst the 23 year old has talent that would be a well worthy of investing in, in order to develop at the club, the fee is a bit commanding for his goal scoring record so far.
I am sure that the debate will be raging just as much as ever among Arsenal fans about the merits of our England international star Theo Walcott and whether or not he can provide the Gunners with a good enough option for the centre forward position.
With the much - awaited FA Cup final less than a week away, there has been a lot of debate amongst the Arsenal fans as to who should start for the Gunners when they take to the field at Wembley.
However, their subsequent punishment has caused much debate, with both the severity and the lack of similar repercussions for more dangerous incidents.
As I said above, I'm happy to debate the merits of what's in front of us, and have people disagree with me, because I'm reasonably sure you (the general you, and you you) care as much about rectifying this scourge of rape culture.
Tottenham striker Harry Kane was the subject of much of the pre-match debate ahead of England's European Championship qualifying clash with Lithuania, and even more so after he was left out of the starting line - up at Wembley.
It is, perhaps, just about possible that Anelka could be good enough friends with somebody to want to dedicate a goal to them in their time of strife, yet not know him or his work in enough detail to understand that (a) even though he claims not to be anti-Semitic, that it is at least a subject of debate; that (b) despite his denials, much of his work looks to both the casual observer and the careful analyst to be flamingly and blatantly anti-Semitic; and (c) that this alleged / obvious and disputed / well - established anti-Semitism is the very basis of the strife in which said friends finds himself.
The Portugal international's future has been the subject of much debate this summer, with reports early in the transfer window suggesting that he wanted to leave the European champions after being accused of tax fraud by the Spanish authorities.
How much of that being down to Diaby having to come off is open to debate but it's foolish of Wenger to invest so much importance in a player with an injury record like Diaby's.
And while there is much blurring, with some sick of Wenger but wanting him to bow out with a trophy and a legacy, and others who have supported his retention now angling for a change, that is our analytical right as fans — we can love the man yet get frustrated with him, we can support him and despair at some of his decisions, and we can debate his merits and flaws ad nauseam.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z