Filmmakers Alex and Andrew Smith made their feature debut more than a decade ago with «The Slaughter Rule,» the cast of which included a then - unknown Amy Adams and Ryan Gosling before he had become some sort
of mythological being.
Wow... I can't believe just how completely messed up it is that someone not only believes they hear the voice
of a mythological being but are also so willing to tell everybody else and wear it like a badge of pride....
I can only hope to face the end with similar dignity and not invoke the help
of a mythological being
(Note: The Right Interpretation
of the Mythological is based upon a lecture delivered at Breslau on 9th January, 1944 by Ernst Lohmeyer.)
«If your knowledge
of mythological beings seems to have failed you, do not fret.
Ms. Woolfalk has created her own society
of mythological beings called the Empathics, who not only blend racial and ethnic differences, but also dissolve the line between humans and plants.
Not exact matches
Instead
of pursuing our dreams as young people, we
're often just trying to avoid imaginary pitfalls or conform to a predictable,
mythological career path.
Most
of the paintings
were narratives with
mythological themes, illustrating stories from hindu epics and literature.
My point
is that those opposed to terminating a small group
of cells, or even a larger fetus that
is not even yet self - aware will base their opposition on the supposed views
of some
mythological creature that, according to their Iron Age Palestinian mythology, caused a grown adult to
be tortured and killed in a grotesque, barbaric fashion.
I
'm quite certain that 99.99 percent
of the human population over the age
of 10 recognizes the fact that the previous mentioned characters
are simply
mythological creatures.
Of course, one might reject this teaching as
mythological nonsense — but then one needs to ask what on earth
is the difference between
being a Lutheran and
being just another secular radical.
How far away from religious agendaships will the leveraging hierarchies
be twained and marked in
being and becoming mere factors
of the
mythological?
Realistically, this has no bearing whatsoever in reality, as the bible has
been proven to by nothing but
mythological fables in the guise
of a life instruction manual.
«He»
is a construct based on may previous
mythological figures who
were «born
of a virgin», «
was resurrected», etc...
IF this
mythological heaven DID exist and by some cruel joke, it
's full
of people like you, I want no part
of it.
Religion — Debating the details
of nonexistent
beings, and how they affect mostly
mythological characters.
There
is nothing anywhere within the construct
of a religious belief system that limits ones faith to a
mythological story.
Tryggve N. D. Mettinger in The Riddle
of the Resurrection: «Dying and Rising Gods» in the Ancient Near East wrote: «There
is, as far as I
am aware, no prima facie evidence that the death and resurrection
of Jesus
is a
mythological construct, drawing on the myths and rites
of the dying and rising gods
of the surrounding world.»
If people find comfort in looking at a mock execution device, believed to represent the torture and death
of their
mythological savior, that
's fine with me.
But especially because you obviously have no concept
of what «blasphemy»
is... The fellow you judged didn't take your Jesus» name in vain, he just used the name as part
of his conversation while talking about the
mythological figure himself...
Being a non-believer black - belt
of of the nth degree I see knowledge
of mythological trivia as important as believers see the understanding
of the intricacies in the definition
of the word theory.
When you
are drowning, pray to god to save you and see what happens, while the other guy rescues himself instead
of asking some mythical
mythological being to do it for him.
There
is the simple recognition that Zeus, considered god
of the sky and ruler
of the Olympian gods in ancient Greece and corresponding to the Roman god Jupiter,
is a
mythological god, the same as Hermes.
Once we see the
mythological imagery
of spiritual warfare in the heavens between God and the waters, and we understand from Genesis 1 that from the darkness and chaos
of the water, God
is seeking to bring beauty and order, we
are then in a position to understand Genesis 6 — 8.
His observation
is even more valid for theology, given the theologian's self - conscious use
of mythological and narrative materials.
«Truth
Be Known
was created in 1995 by independent scholar and author
of comparative religion and mythology D.M. Murdock, also known as «Acharya S.» Acharya's work
is designed to bring to light fascinating lost, hidden and destroyed religious,
mythological and spiritual traditions that reveal an exciting core
of knowledge dating back thousands
of years.
Is the resurrection, however «
mythological» or demythologized our view
of it, even remotely an exercise in human heroism?
First, its premisses concerning society and modern man
are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God
was invented when the human race
was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid
of the religious and
mythological notions that
were appropriate when his thought processes
were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has
been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible
is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel
of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these
are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)
He moved beyond a recognition
of the validity
of much
of Bultmann's position, to argue that since something can
be known about the historical Jesus, we must concern ourselves with working it Out, if we do not wish ultimately to find ourselves committed to a
mythological Lord.
@Chad «no serious scholar buys into that nonsense: The Christ myth theory (also known as Jesus mythicism, the Jesus myth theory and the nonexistence hypothesis)
is the idea that Jesus
of Nazareth
was not a historical person, but
is a fictional or
mythological character created by the early Christian community.
But I think there
is some risk that it might
be misconstrued so as to obscure certain truths which I believe to
be fundamental: that the Passion
is the moment at which that complete oneness with the Father which
is the unique and all - pervading characteristic
of the life
of Jesus
is paradoxically manifested; that it
is at that moment, above all, that Jesus discloses to us God himself in action; that the judgement passed on Jesus and the testing brought to bear upon him
are a judgement and a testing exercised (
of course, within the permissive will
of God) by evil men, or, to use
mythological language, by the devil; and that the judgement
of God pronounced at Calvary
is that which Christ's accepting love passes upon those men, and upon ourselves as sharers in their sinfulness, by showing up their sin in all its hatefulness.
Amazingly enough, fred, I have no respect for someone who
is so afraid
of life and death that he spends his entire existence kowtowing to a
mythological god and his mythology - filled handbook.
Does this mean that what existentialism has done
is simply to remove the
mythological disguise and to vindicate the Christian understanding
of Being as it
is found in the New Testament and to carry it to more logical conclusion?
The LAM scale (Liberal, Antiliberal, and
Mythological)
is demonstrated in Richard A. Hunt, «
Mythological - Symbolic Religious Commitment: The LAM Scales, «Journal for the Scientific Study
of Religion 11 (1972): 42 52.
Furthermore, the gospel inevitably has
been associated with
mythological ways
of stating it which, while entirely appropriate to the times when the association
was made,
are no longer appropriate today.
There certainly
are for those who regard all language about an act
of God or
of a decisive, eschatological event as
mythological.
It
is precisely its immunity from proof which secures the Christian proclamation against the charge
of being mythological.
In this way the resurrection
is not a
mythological event adduced in order to prove the saving efficacy
of the cross, but an article
of faith just as much as the meaning
of the cross itself.
Here the whole set
of images
is of a highly
mythological sort, doubtless related to «redeemer myths» and other primitive, or sometimes more sophisticated, schemes
of thought.
There
is here a summary
of Bultmann's controversial method
of Biblical interpretation, which tries to recover the deeper meaning behind the
mythological concepts
of the New Testament.
Hans Kng would add that Genesis
was «problematic» and that we
are talking
of a «
mythological idea».
And yet, in the incarnation God has affirmed the world and history in such a way that it
is impossible to confine our apprehension
of Him to a
mythological or metaphysical elaboration
of the event
of incarnation.
Bonhoeffer believed the «historicity»
of the Resurrection
was in «the realm
of ambiguity,» and that it
was one
of the «
mythological» elements
of Christianity that «must
be interpreted in such a way as not to make religion a pre-condition
of faith.»
But the biblical witness must
be read in its own context, and when this
is done, we must look for the direction in which the faith
of Israel
was moving, not for the
mythological remnants still present in its expression.
Because
of God's transcendence it would
be mythological to refer to God's action in terms appropriate only to objects available, in principle at least, to ordinary sense perception.13 This especially means that one can not speak
of God in terms
of the categories
of time and space; 14 i.e., whatever
is predicated
of God can not apply only to some particular time and space, but must apply equally to all times and spaces.15 Thus the implication
of Ogden's criterion for non-
mythological language about God corresponds to his statement
of several years ago, that «there
is not the slightest evidence that God has acted in Christ in any way different from the way in which he primordially acts in every other event.
This
mythological interpretation
is a hotch - potch
of sacrificial and juridical analogies, which have ceased to
be tenable for us today.
We have seen that when the Bible
is read against the background
of the ancient
mythological cultures, it
is found to
be pointing in a different direction.
Yet just at the point where we find ourselves assuming full responsibility, free from the restraints
of mythological powers, we become slowly aware that it
is He, the God
of our fathers, who
is in fact prompting, guiding and influencing us from within.
Well, part
of the problem
is that the legends in the Bible frequently exhibit
mythological archetypes that have
been employed by countless religions, such as the God martyred for mankind's salvation.
He thought that it
was possible to strip away the metaphysical doctrines
of the church fathers and the
mythological stories
of the first Christians to reach a Lord whose impact would transform modern lives.