But as Wallace says, that optimism is headed for a collision course with the boring, devastatingly routinized real world — and, in making a point about the pitfalls
of narrow thinking in general, he offers some of the best advice a recently graduated environmentalist will hear:
Get out
of this narrow thinking.
Other examples of this type
of narrow thinking are legion in the business world, and retail food is no exception.
Not exact matches
But focus, by definition,
narrows the scope
of our
thinking, and given how complex and fast moving most business problems are, we should relearn the skill
of simply opening our mind and giving ourselves half an hour to
think, in an unstructured, creative way, about whatever pops up.
Still, while those with less gold - plated resumes need to
think more carefully, Kalt's piece is a refreshing reminder that talent generally shows through — and generally the best way to develop your talent is to follow you interests instead
of trying to stick to a
narrow, pre-described career path.
Contingent motivators (such as «if you do this, then that»)
narrow thinking and block creativity unless the tasks at hand are simple and rote, Daniel Pink said in a TED Talk «The Puzzle
of Motivation.»
«I
think there are implications in a
narrow area such as judicial decision - making, as well as in a more general area
of «understanding and explaining human behavior,»» says Mocan.
«The way we
think about it is that we used to have a very
narrow focus on weight, and now weight is one
of things we focus on but it's not the only thing,» Gary Foster, Weight Watchers» chief scientific officer, told Time magazine in late 2015.
My context for
thinking about markets is the psychology
of longer - term secular cycles and how broad or
narrow markets are (more on this shortly).
Based on your input, I
think I might still try to write about all
of these things, but
narrow my focus and / or spin off that content into a new blog, should anything gain enough traction to be profitable.
In fact, though, I
think even this analysis is too
narrow: e-commerce is inexorably taking over more and more
of the U.S. retail sector in particular, and Amazon is taking over 50 %
of that e-commerce growth.
«History says that in the subsequent years, a
narrow range should not be
thought of as a coiled spring, ready to jump but rather when you have a
narrow range, it usually ends up with a pretty small advance,» he said.
However, I do
think the fact that such a
narrow slice
of the market has driven much
of the S&P 500's gains poses a growing risk and headwind for gains in the coming year.
I do not mean a
narrow economist's definition, but rather the whole way
of thinking about inflation in business, government and the community generally.
Meanwhile, the Bank
of England's Financial Policy Committee (FPC) also released its Financial Stability Report today with
thoughts along the same lines, warning that cyber risk is a strategic priority rather than a
narrow technology issue.
I hope to explore this properly in another note soon, but suffice to say for the time being that the typical framework economists use to
think about inflation - which they proxy by changes in the CPI - is
narrow, incomplete and fails to do justice to the richness
of inflation as a concept.
It is not Mr. Morneau who wrote this response but some shallow
thinking and
narrow economist type steeped in the failing neo-liberal policies
of the last 50 years and whose training in Neoclassical economics has blunted their perception
of reality.
Calomiris proposes (1) internal governance reforms that would decentralize power within the Fed and promote diversity
of thinking; (2) policy process reforms that would
narrow the Fed's primary mandate to price stability and require the Fed to adopt and disclose a systematic approach to monetary policy; and (3) other reforms that would constrain the Fed's asset holdings and activities so as to avoid actions that conflict with its monetary policy mission and that risk undermining its independence.
Instead
of being so «narrow minded» and concerned about «women's rights» attempt to open your mind to people who do things very differently then you do but it is actually working... (Of course I am not naive enough to think my husband never sees another women walking down the street but read between the line
of being so «
narrow minded» and concerned about «women's rights» attempt to open your mind to people who do things very differently then you do but it is actually working... (
Of course I am not naive enough to think my husband never sees another women walking down the street but read between the line
Of course I am not naive enough to
think my husband never sees another women walking down the street but read between the lines)
Is it the problem
of thinking that you won't have troubles as a Christian or is it the problem
of having too
narrow a view
of what is a blessing.
I
think I was sent here to illuminate the dark corners
of narrow minds going nowhere.
Without a relationship with Jesus you do not enter Heaven, im sorry if you
think me bigoted,
narrow minded or unenlightened but that is the truth, you know, the kind
of truth that the rabble have a propensity for crucifying those who speak it?
Once we begin to
think in this way (entailing,
of course, a «paradigm shift») we are able to get beyond our
narrow and destructive anthropocentrism and respect nature almost as we respect our fellow humans.
I was hoping to point out the
narrow mind
thinking, inflexible mentalities
of the two groups
its not really atheism or religion that I have a problem with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along with it that I have a problem with, you say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm talking about, you assume to know what something is about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being
narrow minded in your view towards things, you really act no better than religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more than just the new agey,
think positive all the time that you
think it is, its about being aware
of who you are?
«As you've done to the least
of these you've done unto me...» I
think that a faith which s not broad or deep enough to inspire down to earth empathy - in - action, which doesn't strive for real world results (however temporary they may be), is far too small and
narrow a faith.
Only a small number
of kennedy catholics
think this way and have a
narrow definition
of the «poor».
I
think the conversation between traditional Christian groups and the gay community is much wider than the
narrow debate about the biblical view
of same - sex relations.
It is here that I
think he trivializes his metaphysical position by squeezing it into the too
narrow framework
of scientific inquiry.
They
thought our political establishment adequate to their interests, and they toggled back and forth between Democrat and Republican on the basis
of a fairly
narrow range
of issues.
Within the extremely
narrow sliver
of time when human beings have occupied centre - stage on world history, why is it that this issue has come to dominate our
thoughts and actions?
Group polarization happens when, in the absence
of diverse influences, homogenous group members tend to adopt more extreme and
narrow - minded
thinking as time passes.
And in fact, it was this
narrowing of focus from 1/100 to 1/10 to 1/2 that caused me to finally see what this parable is really about (at least, what I currently
think it is really about).
For me, the z - theory has freed my mind from a
narrow, fundamentalist way
of thinking and has opened new vistas
of understanding and, I hope, wisdom.
Regardless
of your view's on Santorum, the author offers us hope that Evangelicals are beginning to
think beyond the
narrow confines
of strict Bible interpretations and understand the values that underlie the message
of Jesus in the new Testament.
Do you
think the evangelical community has a
narrow view
of what «American» is?
April 1999), which shows that home schooling families are at least as involved in civic activities and the building
of «social capital» as those who send their kids out for education, and she ends with this
thought: «I don't
think we need worry much about their socialization in the
narrow sense, either.
You are so
narrow minded, intransigent (look it up in the dictionary), and without any ability to
think outside
of your little «box» called the bible.
In Science and the Modern World, Whitehead argues strongly against the value
of pure abstraction because it leads to
thinking that is detached from concrete reality and it leads to
narrow specialization.
But that may be too
narrow a way
of thinking.
We should teach both sides
of the story, we shouldn't be
narrowed into one was
of thinking.
As for the «
narrow public witness» against which John Murdock rightly cautions, I really don't
think «prioritizing» equals «ignoring,» such that to prioritize the defense
of religious freedom and the right to life excludes other issues from the Church's social witness and public policy advocacy.
This approach (which is, I
think, more impressionistic than analogical) would have the advantage
of not forcing all religions into a single,
narrow mold — a point to which I shall return.
The secular historian does not have this particular and
narrow concentration
of interest, but
thinks of «tua res agitur» in the comprehensive sense that «nothing human is foreign to thee».
Perhaps no other phrase so aptly characterizes the quality and significance
of Martin Buber's life and
thought as the one
of the «
narrow ridge.»
He is, rather, a very complex structured society which sustains, among many other societies, a regnant, personally ordered, subordinate society (an enduring object) which Whitehead refers to as «the soul
of which Plato spoke» (Adventures
of Ideas 267 — see also pp. 263 - 264 for a clear statement
of the distinction between «the ordinary meaning
of the term «man,» which includes the total bodily man, and the
narrow sense
of «man,» where «man» is considered a person in Whitehead's technical sense, i.e., as the regnant, personally ordered society which he identifies as his equivalent
of Descartes»
thinking substance and Plato's soul).
He who often
thinks of God, will have a larger mind than the man who simply plods around this
narrow globe... The most excellent study for expanding the soul, is the science
of Christ, and Him crucified, and the knowledge
of the Godhead in the glorious Trinity.
It seems this line
of thought narrows the focus
of Paul's argument to just Gentiles in the church.
Once accept the disclosure
of God in Christ (and in all that is Christ - like in human experience, for we ought not to be exclusively christo - centric in the
narrower sense); once take that disclosure with utmost seriousness — and then God as «pure unbounded love» becomes central in our
thinking.
In the
narrow sense, I view these as precursors
of process
thought.