The Obama administration is looking forward to a host
of new environmental regulations that go far beyond the president's plans to issue new standards for greenhouse gas emissions from new and existing power plants.
Industry estimates of the burden
of new environmental regulations have, historically, been wildly inflated.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability
of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our
new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on
new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost
of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates
of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates
of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect
of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result
of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect
of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution
of key milestones such as the receipt
of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation
of our announced acquisition
of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability
of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk
of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production
of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts
of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak
of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact
of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition
of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect
of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and
environmental laws and agency
regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect
of changes in tax law, such as the effect
of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations
of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect
of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability
of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass
of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many
of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment
of interest on, and principal
of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness
of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact
of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition
of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result
of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks
of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions
of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect
of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels
of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments
of the aerospace industry, levels
of air travel, financial condition
of commercial airlines, the impact
of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition
of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization
of the anticipated benefits
of advanced technologies and
new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing
of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition
of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration
of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization
of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels
of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability
of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope
of future repurchases
of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level
of other investing activities and uses
of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition
of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery
of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9)
new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits
of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits
of diversification and balance
of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome
of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact
of the negotiation
of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect
of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect
of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect
of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
of 2017),
environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and
regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability
of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition
of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits
of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing
of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence
of events that may give rise to a right
of one or both
of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee
of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million
of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects
of the announcement or the completion
of the merger on the market price
of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation
of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value
of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability
of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
Even if the FDA puts its foot down, «companies are always going to be able to find a
new synonym or creative marketing term» that doesn't run afoul
of regulations, says Margaret Pollan, an assistant professor
of environmental food law at Pace Law School.
Progress in a few areas has been solid: slashing
of bureaucratic red tape has led to a surge in
new private businesses; full liberalization
of interest rates seems likely following the introduction
of bank deposit insurance in May; Rmb 2 trillion (US$ 325 billion)
of local government debt is being sensibly restructured into long - term bonds; tighter
environmental regulation and more stringent resource taxes have contributed to a surprising two - year decline in China's consumption
of coal.
What makes climate change different, they say, is that there are five
new variables: uncertain and fragmented
environmental legislation and
regulations; the reactions
of capital and insurance markets to emerging business opportunities (and matching risks) posed by climate change; stakeholder activism; pending litigation and the rapidly evolving scientific debate over proper responses to climate change.
Alberta's
new emissions
regulations, just unveiled by the province's fresh NDP government, are a welcome step towards tailoring
environmental policy for the needs
of an expanding oil sands sector.
The Guide discusses what is a Life Cycle Assessment, what are
Environmental Product Declarations, what is the significance of the new European Standards CEN / TC 350 and the impact of the Construction Products Regulation, and looks in detail at the range of environmenta
Environmental Product Declarations, what is the significance
of the
new European Standards CEN / TC 350 and the impact
of the Construction Products
Regulation, and looks in detail at the range
of environmentalenvironmental indicators.
«As a fiduciary
of the
New York City Employee Retirement System for the last 8 years, Scott has worked with his fellow trustees to grow the City's pension funds through prudent investments, improving diversification and ensuring more rigorous assessment
of risks to investments such as corporate accountability and violations
of environmental regulations.»
Facing a chronic problem
of raw sewage emptying into NYC waterways during rainfalls, and struggling to meet health
regulations,
environmental officials are turning to a
new method
of treating bacteria in sewage: dumping chlorine into sewer pipes leading to the waterways.
IOGA
of NY and its members have waited patiently for, and worked diligently toward, the finalization
of the Supplemental Generic
Environmental Impact Statement (SGEIS) and the
new regulations that would govern future oil and natural gas development in New York,» the group wrote in the lett
new regulations that would govern future oil and natural gas development in
New York,» the group wrote in the lett
New York,» the group wrote in the letter.
The former regional administrator
of the EPA under President Obama, Judith Enck, says the
new head
of the EPA under President Trump, Scott Pruitt, threatens to roll back major
environmental regulations, including climate change actions and pollution protections.
[214] Euan Phimister has said that bills are likely to increase across the whole
of Great Britain because renewable schemes and
new nuclear power stations in England are both receiving higher subsidies than the power plants which will shortly close due to
environmental regulations.
Productive
environmental regulations have been made, such as the ban on hydrofracking in 2015 — though data collected by the Environmental Advocates of New York (EANY) revealed that waste from other states is still being dumped
environmental regulations have been made, such as the ban on hydrofracking in 2015 — though data collected by the
Environmental Advocates of New York (EANY) revealed that waste from other states is still being dumped
Environmental Advocates
of New York (EANY) revealed that waste from other states is still being dumped in
New York.
Fearing
New York will face the same fate as federal
environmental regulations, advocates have also raised concerns about the permanency
of Cuomo's executive orders should he leave office.
«Until they make a commitment to updating the state's
regulations and the legal framework, we would oppose them moving forward in
New York,» said David Gahl, policy director
of Environmental Advocates
of New York.
Citing the resolution, he said the company failed to demonstrate to town officials that it was applying for the necessary permits from the
New York State Thruway Authority, or the
New York State Department
of Transportation, adding that it also failed to show that it was complying with
regulations under the
New York State
Environmental Quality Review Act.
In May, Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman
of New York filed a lawsuit against several federal agencies that are affiliated with the Delaware River Basin Commission, a multistate entity including
New York that regulates the river basin, to block the commission from issuing final
regulations on hydrofracking until a full
environmental review could be conducted.
A coalition including cooling industry representatives and
environmental activist Erin Brockovich called on the state to enforce federal water
regulations, regularly test the water supply and improve
New York's water infrastructure, as data show the state has the highest number
of Legionnaire's disease cases in the nation.
The Department
of Environmental Conservation is nearing completion on an environmental impact study and new regulations for gas drilling using horizontal drilling and high - volume frackin
Environmental Conservation is nearing completion on an
environmental impact study and new regulations for gas drilling using horizontal drilling and high - volume frackin
environmental impact study and
new regulations for gas drilling using horizontal drilling and high - volume fracking technology.
«If the governor is going to go ahead and green light this anyway, then the Department
of Environmental Conservation needs the resources and the staff to oversee the state's laws and
regulations,» says Katherine Nadaeu, with
Environmental Advocates, who says without the additional staff the
new rules would be just «words on paper».
A
new report from Environmental Advocates of New York is questioning the state's regulation of wastewater from oil and gas wel
new report from
Environmental Advocates
of New York is questioning the state's regulation of wastewater from oil and gas wel
New York is questioning the state's
regulation of wastewater from oil and gas wells.
A public - private «green partnership» between the county's Lead Primary Prevention Pilot Program and Gro - West, Inc., will again be offering a series
of instructional classes on window replacement prior to
new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
regulations mandating lead... Read more
New York
environmental officials have released a revised set
of proposed
regulations for hydraulic fracturing natural gas and will begin taking public comment on them in December.
Among the benefits the
environmental company received was help with an attempt to obtain favorable Department
of Health
regulations concerning wastewater from hydrofracking in case the procedure was approved in
New York state.
Tenney called
new Environmental Protection Agency
regulations of carbon emissions from power plants «a job killer» that would not have much
of an effect on the climate.
Oneida County's housing stock is among the oldest in
New York State, and while sturdy and architecturally aesthetic, is covered with lead - based paints requiring specialized knowledge
of lead - safe work practices compliant with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
regulations that went into effect in 2010.
On Wednesday, October 30, hundreds
of New Yorkers from across the state came to Albany to expose Governor Cuomo and the Department
of Environmental Conservation's (DEC) proposed Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
regulations for what they are: fatally flawed, a danger to public health and our well - being, and supportive
of a massive fracking infrastructure build out.
The
Environmental Protection Agency has announced
new regulations covering the use
of pesticides by employees at farms, nurseries, greenhouses and in forests.
However, it was later discovered that due to explicit
New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation («NYSDEC»)
regulations, this funding could only be used by a local municipality to gain the proper certifications and permits to apply rodenticide, not actually administer a program or purchase supplies.
Steve Ammerman, a spokesman for the
New York Farm Bureau, said the disputed permit system «contains some
of the toughest
environmental regulations in the country overseeing manure storage and spreading.»
ALBANY, NY (01/10/2013)(readMedia)--
New York Water Rangers partners joined with experts from across the state today at a
New York State Assembly hearing on the Department
of Environmental Conservation's (DEC) proposed High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing («fracking»)
regulations and to call on Governor Cuomo to protect
New York from the harmful effects
of fracking.
New regulations from the State Department
of Environmental Conservation are out this week, aimed at protecting natural resources.
Arguing that
environmental regulations haven't kept pace with
new science, the Washington, D.C. - based advocacy group Oceana last week petitioned Secretary
of Commerce Don Evans to take immediate steps to protect the sea - floor organisms in U.S. waters.
Naked Gun 2 1/2, which is a perversely, though funny, movie really about
environmental regulation; and it's a Leslie Nielsen movie, and he is a cop who is basically been called upon to protect, in a fictional Bush administration, the president has decided we're going to have a whole
new fuel system which isn't going to be nuclear or kind
of fossil fuels, coal and oil — it is going to be based on alternatives.
The US
Environmental Protection Agency says that 5 per cent
of the power used by American companies is consumed by computers, and that without
regulation this figure could reach 10 per cent by the year 2000 («Birth
of the eco-computer»,
New Scientist, 30 October 1993).
Since Searchinger's paper was published, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, spurred by Congress, has been mulling whether to take so - called indirect land use into account when calculating the carbon footprint
of biofuels for
new regulations it is crafting, expected by December.
Local officials, charged with meeting aggressive economic targets for their region's industry, tend to ignore national
environmental regulations, covering up spills and building
new power plants behind the backs
of central government regulators.
U.S. President Donald Trump signed an order on Tuesday directing regulators to review an Obama administration rule that expanded the number
of federally protected waterways as the
new president targets
environmental regulations conservatives label as government overreach.
The chemical industry is interested in moving away from fossil fuels to bio-based products to reduce
environmental impacts and to meet
new regulations for sustainability, said Yong Wang, Voiland Distinguished Professor in the Gene and Linda Voiland School
of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering.
In remarks published on the website
of the Ministry
of Environmental Protection (www.mep.gov.cn) on Friday, minister Zhou Shengxian said China was working on
new regulations for pollution permits and would also publish proposals for
new pilot trading projects as soon as possible.
And it calls on Congress «to take quick action to prohibit the EPA [
Environmental Protection Agency] from moving forward with
new greenhouse gas
regulations that will harm the nation's economy and threaten millions
of jobs over the next quarter century.»
In response to rising
environmental concerns related to drilling waste, North Dakota's legislature passed a handful
of new regulations this year, including a rule that bars storing wastewater in open pits.
Beginning January 1, 2006, street motorcycles and motor - driven cycles year model 2006 and
newer, with engines less than 50 cc displacement, require an emission label certifying them to meet U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency emission
regulations, and may be registered regardless
of mileage.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Admin., the
Environmental Protection Agency and the state
of California, along with a heavy dose
of input from auto makers, will release a proposal by Sept. 1 outlining the
new round
of fuel - economy and emissions
regulations for the 2017 - 2025 timeframe.
Environmental friendly features The
new model achieved an additional 50 % reduction in emissions from the levels
of the 2005 exhaust emission
regulations set forth by Japan's Ministry
of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.
Dog Gone Smart also is well positioned to expand further into northern European markets where
new health and
environmental regulations are being put in place to ban harmful chemicals, those
of which Dog Gone Smart does not use in its products.
(2) A military activity carried out by DOD as
of the effective date
of these
regulations and specifically identified in the section entitled «Department
of Defense Activities»
of the FMP / FEIS is not considered a pre-existing activity if: (i) It is modified in such a way that requires the preparation
of an
environmental assessment or environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., relevant to a Sanctuary resource or quality; (ii) It is modified, including but not limited to changes in location or frequency, in such a way that its possible adverse effects on Sanctuary resources or qualities are significantly greater than previously considered for the unmodified activity; (iii) It is modified, including but not limited to changes in location or frequency, in such a way that its possible adverse effects on Sanctuary resources or qualities are significantly different in manner than previously considered for the unmodified activity; or (iv) There are new circumstances or information relevant to a Sanctuary resource or quality that were not addressed in th
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., relevant to a Sanctuary resource or quality; (ii) It is modified, including but not limited to changes in location or frequency, in such a way that its possible adverse effects on Sanctuary resources or qualities are significantly greater than previously considered for the unmodified activity; (iii) It is modified, including but not limited to changes in location or frequency, in such a way that its possible adverse effects on Sanctuary resources or qualities are significantly different in manner than previously considered for the unmodified activity; or (iv) There are new circumstances or information relevant to a Sanctuary resource or quality that were not addressed in th
environmental impact statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., relevant to a Sanctuary resource or quality; (ii) It is modified, including but not limited to changes in location or frequency, in such a way that its possible adverse effects on Sanctuary resources or qualities are significantly greater than previously considered for the unmodified activity; (iii) It is modified, including but not limited to changes in location or frequency, in such a way that its possible adverse effects on Sanctuary resources or qualities are significantly different in manner than previously considered for the unmodified activity; or (iv) There are new circumstances or information relevant to a Sanctuary resource or quality that were not addressed in th
Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., relevant to a Sanctuary resource or quality; (ii) It is modified, including but not limited to changes in location or frequency, in such a way that its possible adverse effects on Sanctuary resources or qualities are significantly greater than previously considered for the unmodified activity; (iii) It is modified, including but not limited to changes in location or frequency, in such a way that its possible adverse effects on Sanctuary resources or qualities are significantly different in manner than previously considered for the unmodified activity; or (iv) There are
new circumstances or information relevant to a Sanctuary resource or quality that were not addressed in the FMP / FEIS.
As Lindquist works through
new aesthetic and political questions — a video about his research into state
environmental regulations is in the works for the upcoming May 2018 Whitney ISP exhibition — we would do well to pay continued attention to how he discloses parts
of our world we'd rather not see.