Research shows the importance
of nonacademic factors for predicting outcomes such as retention, persistence, and engagement in college as well as graduation from college.
Not exact matches
The percentage
of doctorate holders in
nonacademic S&E occupations who are underrepresented minorities increased from 4.4 percent in 1990 to 6.1 in 2005, a substantial increase if it were not over a very small base.18 Myers and Turner concluded that market forces such as wages play a more prominent role in affecting faculty representation in the short run than pipeline
factors designed to increase the supply
of minority faculty.19
But
nonacademic factors — such as absences and even behavior in elementary school — are also strong indications
of how successful students will be when they take the exam.
New metrics, like school climate or social and emotional progress, are likely to generate demand for interventions that attend to
nonacademic factors of students» experiences.
The Role
of Arts Participation in Student's Academic and
Nonacademic Outcomes: A Longitudinal Study, Home, and Community
Factors.
Lesli A. Maxwell is an assistant managing editor for Education Week who oversees coverage
of school district news and leadership, English - language learners, charter schools and school choice issues, and school climate, discipline, and
nonacademic factors that affect students.
«Multimetric accountability promotes comprehensive student achievement and well - being by using multiple measures
of performance, incorporating a range
of subjects, including
nonacademic factors, and promoting continuous improvement and support.
Although grades should definitely reflect the quality
of students» academic performance, many teachers believe that students» work habits, responsibility, and attitudes — what researcher Robert Marzano (2000) calls
nonacademic factors — are also important.
Together, the districts created their own set
of student performance standards based on academic and
nonacademic qualities; grit and tenacity will
factor in, along with state exams and other non-state tests.
It does not mean eliminating measurement
of academic attainment and growth; it means coupling those with rigorous, reliable and valid indicators
of school organization and other
nonacademic factors.
In collaboration with the Consortium, UChicago Impact, the Urban Education Institute's innovation arm, developed the 5Essentials system, which is composed
of surveys, reports, and training supports that states, districts, and schools can use to track progress on the
nonacademic factors proven to drive school success.
Decades
of rigorous research revealed five
nonacademic factors predictive
of school success: effective leaders, collaborative teachers, involved families, a supportive environment and ambitious instruction.
Cities and states at the vanguard
of rethinking accountability and measuring
nonacademic factors illuminate a productive and thoughtful path forward, drawing upon an impressive research base and proven results.
Incorporate important
nonacademic factors such as measures
of school climate, safety, and parental engagement.
Over the past few years, nearly 6,000 schools across 14 states have used the 5Essentials survey to systematically measure
nonacademic factors that decades
of research have shown matter most for school improvement and student success.
To quote a recent NASBE publication: «On one hand, this new flexibility was a welcome federal recognition
of the contribution
nonacademic factors make to student academic success.