Does it accurately represent the sentiments
of nontheists in this country?
So long as there are those who identify God with some one - sided abstraction like infinity; absoluteness, or worst of all omnipotence (not even a self - consistent abstraction), we shall need the help both of more balanced theists and
of nontheists to counteract these more subtle and intellectual forms of idolatry.
Not exact matches
It is a merit
of modern existentialist thinkers, including
nontheists like Martin Heidegger and Jean - Paul Sartre, that they understand and insist upon this truth about human nature.
Alvin Plantinga, explaining the vehemence with which atheists like Dawkins use evolution as a weapon against theism, says that, «For the
nontheist, evolution is the only game in town; it is an essential part
of any reasonably complex nontheistic way
of thinking...» (Plantinga 18 - 19).
«But atheist, agnostic and humanist students suffer the same problems as religious students — deaths or illnesses in the family, questions about the meaning
of life, etc. — and would like a sympathetic
nontheist to talk to.»
Unlike Cox, who concludes that the theist and
nontheist encounter the same reality but name it differently, I perceive a fundamental difference in the primordial experience
of ultimate reality.
Plantinga plays «defense» because he is an adherent
of a popular epistemic perspective — affirmed by many theists and
nontheists alike — that maintains that defense is all that is required with respect to beliefs formed the way Plantinga contends that belief in God is formed for most «intellectually sophisticated adult theists» (FP 3: 312).
From his obituary, Charles T. Beaird «was a «
nontheist,» meaning in simplistic terms that the concept
of God was not among the ideas on which he based his beliefs — but that if you did, it was fine with him.»
The disproof
of these models and the ongoing appeal by
nontheists to more and more bizarre unknowns and unknowables seem to reflect the growing strength
of the case for theism.