It's that idea
of the noosphere, that the sum of all knowledge will unlock the secrets of the universe and that idea of (Pierre Teilhard) de Chardin that building knowledge will bring us up to god.»
The universe is «unconscious» according to this conviction in all of the evolutionary phases preceding the emergence
of the noosphere.1
15 Teilhard, for his part, suggests that when evolution is viewed as the process in which the consciousness within matter emerges and is transmuted into Spirit, natural history is seen to have a different direction — or rather, since we are on the level
of the noosphere, a different purpose.
The Incarnation is the source of man's understanding of this added transcendent dimension, for it points to a reality beyond the immediate grasp
of the noosphere: the union of God with his creation.
As Teilhard insists, there is no reason for us to think that the present status
of the noosphere constitutes the end of the evolutionary process.
When I use the term «faith» I am referring to this stance of adventurous, risk - filled openness that would allow such a possibility to take hold
of the noosphere without in any way disrupting its «normal» forms of interaction.
When we are dealing in general with the gradual development
of the noosphere into planetary consciousness we must of course do full justice to the great, the essential part played by the other sections of the human race in bringing about the eventual plenitude of the earth.
Not exact matches
, the animating spirit) and speaking
of the global «
noosphere» (Teilhard 1959).
In post-war France and later the rest
of Europe and America, Teilhard de Chardin brought these ideas back for a while by resurrecting the Greek notion
of nous (the conceiving and communicating mind — opposed to pneuma, the animating spirit) and speaking
of the global «
noosphere» (Teilhard 1959).
Amongst the various forms
of psychic interaction which animate the
noosphere, therefore, it is the «intercentric» energies that we have above all to identify, to harness and to develop if we would make an effective contribution to the progress
of evolution within ourselves.
The fact is that during the last six thousand years, in the Mediterranean area, a neo-humanity has been germinating and is now at this moment completing its absorption into itself
of the remaining vestiges
of the neolithic mosaic
of ethnic groupings, so as to form a new layer,
of greater density than all the others, on the
noosphere.
Man is still reduced to an instance
of an animal instead
of seeing the phenomenon
of reflection as giving birth to a radically new dimension, that
of the thinking layer or the
noosphere.
In order to fulfill itself, memory had to double itself by tending to the other direction — forward — and in the process a new space - time dimension was born, the
noosphere, in which the future is attained by the foresight
of reason.
It would also bring out more clearly the formal ontological difference between biosphere and the «
noosphere»
of personal minds.
Consequently, from what itself is material, there is no independent leap immanent in the nature
of the material, into the «
noosphere».
In another sense, it is also true to say that existence precedes essence, and the metaphysical view is consequently wrong in denying it, for essence in this case is defined within the world
of interpersonal relationships, within the world
of history and human society, within the world
of reason itself which Teilhard would call the
noosphere.
Teilhard de Chardin calls this level the
noosphere, and the process
of creativity, that
of noogenesis.
While using little
of the traditional language
of resurrection and judgment, Teilhard's figure
of an ecstasy in the
noosphere retains two essential elements in the doctrine
of the resurrection
of the body.
Awareness
of this divine action will increase until the
noosphere, without being consummated, will have evolved into what Teilhard called the theosphere.
In Marxism the law
of dialectical conflict atrophies in an unintroduced period
of static harmony; and in Teilhard, cooperation in grace turns to absolute reliance upon God's power to sustain and perfect that which has been germinating in the
noosphere.
In a future which closes upon God, death is the last historical act
of the individual and the
noosphere.
Together these two energies are responsible for moving the evolutionary history
of the world from geosphere to biosphere to
noosphere.
«They told me — this research group — that they can upload people into the
noosphere like any old packet
of data.
Now here's my broader take on what I've begun calling the «knowosphere» — a word intentionally echoing the more allegorical «
noosphere,» the «planet
of the mind»
of Vladimir Vernadsky and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.
There was a Russian geochemist, Vladimir Vernadsky, who in the 1930's foresaw a day when the globe evolved from simply being a common habitat for myriad species to being what he called a «
noosphere,» a planet
of the mind, a place where ecology and enlightened human intelligence meld.
It's no accident that what I call «knowosphere» derives from
noosphere — an emerging planet
of the mind — a phrase that emerged in the mid 20th century in large part through the writings
of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a French Jesuit priest, philosopher and paleontologist (who's mentioned in a footnote in the encyclical).
I'm grateful to Krista Tippett, the host
of the captivating public radio program «On Being,» for including me in an exploration
of the present - day resonance
of «
noosphere,» the concept
of an emerging global intelligence shaped in the early 20th century by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a French Jesuit priest, philosopher and paleontologist (with others).
My main interest here is in assessing the value
of such tools in deriving meaning from patterns within the emerging «
noosphere.»]
Unfortunately, it's no more speculative than a lot
of putative cause & effect chains that are floating around in the
noosphere.