Sentences with phrase «of nothingness from»

This huge expanse of nothingness from which the Nullarbor Plain derives its name could become a major source of energy for the country.

You might have been wondering where I've been after these last few weeks of nothingness from the ol' FU machine.

If from nothing bursts forth something, it's the very existence of nothingness from whence there could be....

Not exact matches

Neither can the lakes and rivers and bays and streams and creeks flowing from the vast oceanic sea of Nothingness be denied.

From the outer reaches of Spatial Nothingness and even far into the innermost depths of all Atomized Nothingness Realms, God's Holiness Spirit will forever dwell apart from and forever within us alFrom the outer reaches of Spatial Nothingness and even far into the innermost depths of all Atomized Nothingness Realms, God's Holiness Spirit will forever dwell apart from and forever within us alfrom and forever within us all...

Few can match Job for pure misery, a man who went from immense personal wealth and happiness to utter nothingness in a matter of days, and fewer can match him for stony faith — a resolute, steely trust that God had an answer, even if that answer didn't really make sense from an earthly perspective.

Nothingness flows within all materialized things from the biggest of stars to the very smallest atom.

Without a model of quantum gravity, it is IMPOSSIBLE to describe the initial state of the universe, or even be sure if it really was a singularity, let alone «coming into existence from nothingness» (not that we even have an example of «nothingness» to compare to.

As for the watch problem, its so hypothetical it's really not worth much more to pursue because you are right, I think it highly imporbable a watch would appear from nothingness, and since that has never in the history of the universe as we know it, to have happened, to discuss what I would do in that event is moot.

Why aren't atheists ever swayed into belief by WLC's meanderings about his hypothetical «uncaused caused» (named god) which is made of nothing but poofed everything into existence from its nothingness?

Which is to say that the path which the individual life must take is one of growth from nothingness to being, by attempting first to understand that one's life situation is ambiguous; second, by opening oneself up to the creative God - power within oneself and waiting for its revelation, however gradually it may come; and third, by acting upon its discovery.

Nothingness is predicted by simple mathematics and the beginning of the universe came from absolutely nothing, like a proton popping into existence.

The humanist witness of his fiction is to testify, negatively, that neither art nor life can be made from nothingness.

Philosophers often throw around the phrase ex nihilo, meaning «out of nothing,» to argue from a logical standpoint that nothing can only give rise to more nothingness.

During this short time, we don't have the apparatus to fully understand God, but many of us see the fallacy of believing in things like the «big bang» theory where ordered things come from nothingness.

Don't expect others to necessarily believe it, but for me, being thrown out into nothingness (in my tortured mind) and finding myself rescued from out of the nothingness is something not easily forgotten.

If God were to «let go» of creation, it would back into the nothingness from which it came.

If God will raise us from death to a new life of fuller communion with himself then this will be sheer miracle: God's re-creative Word affirming us in the moment of our utter nothingness.

Nevertheless, the modern artist, by inverting or reversing our mythical traditions, has disclosed a totally immanent mode of existence banished even from the memory of transcendence, and created a comprehensive vision of a new and total nothingness which Blake named as Ulro, or Hell.

And Whitehead can summarize his own reformed subjectivist principle as follows: «that apart from the experiences of subjects there is nothing, nothing, nothing, bare nothingness.»

Not only is the mutable world separated from its divine principle — the One — by intervals of emanation that descend in ever greater alienation from their source, but because the highest truth is the secret identity between the human mind and the One, the labor of philosophy is one of escape: all multiplicity, change, particularity, every feature of the living world, is not only accidental to this formless identity, but a kind of falsehood, and to recover the truth that dwells within, one must detach oneself from what lies without, including the sundry incidentals of one's individual existence; truth is oblivion of the flesh, a pure nothingness, to attain which one must sacrifice the world.

If your brain is merely a minuscule portion and intermediate result of a guideless process of self - existing particles that just happened to unpack themselves from an unexplained singularity and arrange themselves into various integrated systems of matter and life of increasing complexity over billions of years, which will ultimately disorganize and dissipate into nothingness, why should any value be attached to your thoughts, or to your existence?

I'm waxing quite Eastern here, I know, But that, I would say, is the nature of God's presence in the fallen world: his image, his bride, the deep joy and longing of creation, called from nothingness to be joined to him.

Can science explain the entire process of evolution of human being starting from the beginning of nothingness in the universe?

Just the one of were we created by a God or did we arrive here from nothingness?

As for the «No serious attempt to explain an acausal event» I will leave you with a, albeit paraphrased, quote from Stephen Hawking: «The very notion of nothingness necessitated the eventual creation of everything.»

That's as simplistic as I can so write CK... For before the Holy Spirit became flesh and bones, Chaos ensued and immeasurable amounts of Big Bangs began to multiply within great distances from each other... We are aware of but one Big Bang and I am in sorrows that our astrophysicists can not rightly fathom the plausible conditionings that permeate the theoretical potential for immeasurable amounts of Big Bangs leisurely being born / established within the Holy Spirit and / or Spatial Nothingness...

After excoriating the «nothingness» of the Reagan and Bush years, she writes: «But the recoil from nothingness has left a space that, just possibly, could be filled in by a new faith that government can help people's lives.

Finally, they market their new «Slyence» as a convincing Religion of truth and order, which by chance exploded and evolved from the No - God of random nothingness.

You also might realize that the vast majority of those of us with «deep psychiatric issues» (your words) have no problem at all with atheistic beliefs (and they are beliefs — you are choosing to believe the universe sprang from nothingness, which is no less absurd than a benevolent creator).

It is now believed that the Hebrew word is an adaptation of a foreign one meaning god; and so we see how the Hebrew mind operated in relation to this matter: from foreign god to nothingness — they were intimately one and the same!

If indeed we can have within us the evolutionary steps starting with cosmic creation — from nothingness into everything that IS, to open up to the part of our hearts and minds that experience this is to reestablish our connection with the oneness from which we came.

I thought that the apprehension of nothingness came from out of time and circumstance, a lightning bolt of truth that had nothing to do with the day before, the house I lived in, my family, and my age.

In a Christian book of the second century, the Shepherd of Hermas, the first commandment is rendered: «First of all believe that God is one, who created and formed all things, who called everything from nothingness into existence, who, Himself incomprehensible, comprehends all in Himself.»

Can you Redhead fathom the moorings (I am not securing any vessels at the time, although I am sure my uncles fishing boat is pulled up on the beach) of absolute nothingness (yes, I am currently studying dark matter but that is not nothingness) where from all material meanderings (to meander is to be in a constant change of path (like religions) currently are, I am not religious and I do not meander as I see it as a waste of time when traveling from one place to the next.)

Is the Nothingness you mention from the human perspective of things we can not see of God?

The anxious self can make its own self - gratification the sole object of desire, or sensuality becomes a convenient means of escape from the self's agony through the obliteration of feeling, the plunge into nothingness.

If you get rid of your individual self with all its shortcomings and doubts by utmost self - effacement, you free yourself from the feeling of your own nothingness and can participate in God's glory.6

Eros is the power of God to bring being from nothingness; tragic love is providential care for a cosmos immersed in inevitable suffering and conflict.

Profoundly established in the centre of its own nothingness, it can be assailed by naught that comes from below; and since it no longer desires anything, what comes from above can not depress it; for its desires alone are the causes of its woes.»

According to the excellent phrase of André Neher, from his fine book on the prophets, a gulf of nothingness separates the new creation from the old.5 No Aufhebung can suppress this deadly fault.

Ultimately Whitehead articulates what he calls the revised subjectivist principle: «that apart from the experiences of subjects there is nothing, nothing, bare nothingness» (PR 167).

From the very smallest and lowest crevice to the most high chasms, the Sea of Nothingness is the Holy Spirit of God.

The religious visions of mankind have usually pointed toward something or someone that saves the world of nature and of human experience from vanishing into a total nothingness.

At best, Meister Eckhart's idea of the divine Nothingness, or Jacob Boehme's notion of the Nonground (Ungrund) in God may serve as bridges of understanding from a Christian experience of the transcendent to a Buddhist one.

You are comfortable accepting your faith in the scientific method and the laws that we recognize in science to be capable of one day answering those questions about origins «evolving» from «nothingness».

Or, phrased differently, being was experienced as the passage of all things from future possibility into the nothingness of the past through the narrow juncture of the always disappearing present; and so the thought of being had not yet been separated into a stark opposition between temporality and eternity.

In my comment a couple of days ago I went through a thought experiment concerning the third possibility above and arrived at the following — if existence just is, then it was not created (either from God or out of nothingness) and therefore it has always been here (remember I'm talking about all of existence, not a conceivably lesser object like the universe).

Instead of shying away from the conclusion that nothingness is the only possible content of the New Jerusalem, Altizer embraces it.

When we have deduced what we deduce by our reason and from study of visible nature, and then read what we read in His inspired word, and find the two apparently discordant, this is the feeling I think we ought to have on our minds» not an impatience to do what is beyond our powers, to weigh evidence, sum up, balance, decide, and reconcile, to arbitrate between the two voices of God» but a sense of the utter nothingness of worms such as we are; of our plain and absolute incapacity to contemplate things as they really are; a perception of our emptiness, before the great Vision of God....