I'm fairly agnostic, these are difficult issues; but in my view anyone on either side
of the nuclear debate who characterises the other side as all being irrational are themselves being irrational.
[in my view anyone on either side
of the nuclear debate who characterizes the other side as all being irrational are themselves being irrational.]
The absence of the threat of spontaneous superpower conflict takes some of the urgency and purism out
of the nuclear debate; the economic context has been comprehensively reconfigured by Thatcherism; and on Europe almost all Labour MPs, including the leader, and most Labour voters, supported membership.
Not exact matches
We can
debate how seriously one should take Trump's baiting
of Kim Jong Un (or vice versa), but for the first time since the collapse
of the Soviet Union, the possibility
of a
nuclear war is part
of the zeitgeist.
He recently published a book detailing and criticizing the
nuclear policy
debates and decisions
of that era.
Of an estimated 100 million television viewers — 10 times the number of people who tuned in for The Voice's season 1 finale — most stay up past the «main event» to watch former secretaries of the U.S. government debate nuclear policy with astronomer Carl Saga
Of an estimated 100 million television viewers — 10 times the number
of people who tuned in for The Voice's season 1 finale — most stay up past the «main event» to watch former secretaries of the U.S. government debate nuclear policy with astronomer Carl Saga
of people who tuned in for The Voice's season 1 finale — most stay up past the «main event» to watch former secretaries
of the U.S. government debate nuclear policy with astronomer Carl Saga
of the U.S. government
debate nuclear policy with astronomer Carl Sagan.
Another crucial
debate topic: Are there points
of light in a fixed firmament, or are there balls
of gas undergoing
nuclear fusion grouped into galaxies in an expanding universe.
When I was in college dreaming about being a famous painter and
debating nuclear disarmament's impact on the populist catholic socialism
of Central America, I never imagined that I would grow up to be so boring.
At a
debate in Britain, David Lange was asked about the peace that we live in cast by the shadow
of nuclear weapons, to which he quipped I can almost smell the uranium now!
With their gross generalizations about
nuclear weaponry, the churches seem to have contracted a severe case
of nuclear «theology» which conveniently shields them from the ambiguities and complexities
of the
nuclear weapons
debate.
It ought to come as a surprise to no one, therefore, that from the time
of the first splitting
of the atom down through the destruction
of Hiroshima and on to current controversies about
nuclear weapons and power plants, Christian people have been involved individually and corporately at every level
of the
debate, not incidentally but specifically because
of their Christian commitment.
Dr Peter Hodgson, formerly head
of the
Nuclear Physics theoretical division at the University
of Oxford, has long been involved in the science — faith
debate and has contributed widely to the Catholic Church's appreciation
of modern physics, especially as a consultant to the Pontifical Council
of Culture.
All these factors heighten the importance
of the present
nuclear debate.
The churches at this point have a great responsibility not to advocate over-all idealistic solutions but to emphasize the distinctively Christian message that is relevant to these issues, to help their members to see the world without the characteristic American ideological blinders, to challenge many
of the prevailing assumptions about the cold war and
nuclear armaments, and to encourage the
debate on public questions about which most people prefer to be silent.
It is in the long - range interest
of both sides
of the
nuclear power
debate to produce a safe permanent disposal program.
When I was in college dreaming about being a famous painter and
debating nuclear disarmament's impact on the populist catholic socialism
of Central America, I never imagined that I would...
The Lords
debate on the Treaty on the Prohibition
of Nuclear Weapons came ahead of a UN high - level conference on nuclear disarmament, due to be held
Nuclear Weapons came ahead
of a UN high - level conference on
nuclear disarmament, due to be held
nuclear disarmament, due to be held in May.
A trio
of senior ministers have demanded a full discussion on Britain's
nuclear policy in the wake
of the decision not to
debate the issue at this year's Labour conference.
The current
debate tends to remove the focus from
nuclear weapons themselves as the referent
of threat and transfers it to particular potential possessors and users
of the threat.
It is why my first act as Prime Minister last year was to lead the
debate in Parliament that ensured the renewal
of Britain's independent
nuclear deterrent.
At the Liberal Democrat Conference a few weeks ago in Glasgow there were many important
debates on taxation, the environment,
nuclear weapons and most notably
of all, on the economy.
Making the final comments before an amendment was withdrawn to help the aging Millstone
nuclear power plant, State Representative and House Minority Leader Themis Klarides (R) argues for a full
debate for the controversial amendment on the final day
of the legislative session.
«Such,» they said, «is the talismanic power
of nuclear weaponry that few politicians seem willing to trust the electorate with a real
debate about the military capacity we need in the world
of today.»
This unhappy state
of affairs is in stark contrast to the
debate over Britain's
nuclear weapons capability.
«Liam Fox expresses his fear that Iran may have a
nuclear weapon next year as Lib Dems demand to know if money is already being spent on components for Trident Main Tory MPs
debate the merits
of the Health and Social Care Bill»
If this happens in a national crisis (say a
nuclear warhead took out a large portion
of the chain
of command quickly) and has not been resolved previously, this
debate might not matter and the ex-president will likely take over quickly but temporarily.
«We just gave away $ 7.6 billion to Exelon, an out -
of - state energy company,» he said, referring to a
debated estimate for the state's plan to subsidize upstate
nuclear plants.
Legislation - London local authorities and Transport for London (no 2) bill Questions - deputy prime minister, attorney - general Ten minute rule motion - cooperative housing tenure Legislation - protection
of freedoms bill Adjournment
debate - future
nuclear power production at Sellafield
Trident as a political and diplomatic weapon The
debate about the future
of Britain's
nuclear deterrent is happening behind closed doors, writes Channel 4 News Science Correspondent Julian Rush.
Jeremy Corbyn insisted he would put
nuclear disarmament at the heart
of his leadership re-election campaign as he promised to vote against the renewal
of Trident in a Commons
debate that will expose deep divisions within the Labour party.
My
debate team's topic is about the use
of domestic
nuclear energy in the United States.
But the six - hour
debate, in which Mrs May said she would use
nuclear weapons if pushed, split Labour MPs three ways and sparked extraordinary scenes
of open civil war between them.
PLAN TO SHIP
NUCLEAR WASTE DOWN HUDSON CAUSES
DEBATE In recent months, routes to dispose
of 76,000 metric tons
of used fuel have been discussed in Congress.
The SNP's Westminster group leader Angus Robertson branded the
debate on the
nuclear deterrent «one
of the most important decision parliament will ever take».
The original application for the GE Hitachi plant in 2009 set off a protracted
debate over whether the NRC, headquartered in Rockville, Maryland, sufficiently weighs proliferation risks when licensing new types
of enrichment technology (See «Laser plant offers cheap way to make
nuclear fuel»).
These events — even more than the use
of nuclear weapons at the end
of World War II — launched an ongoing public
debate over whether the risks
of radiation exposure outweigh the benefits
of nuclear technology.
The news
of the blasts came as the Indian Parliament was
debating its own
nuclear tests.
The top priority should be to initiate a national
debate and a comprehensive assessment
of Japan's
nuclear policy.
At a tense
debate in February at UCLA where Jacobson argued over the merits
of supporting
nuclear versus ramping up renewables, sharing the stage with
nuclear supporters like Environmental Progress» Shellenberger and fellow Stanford climate scientist Ken Caldeira, the question - and - answer session with the audience devolved into a shouting match.
Much productive work might be achieved if this book became required reading for
nuclear weapons scientists and antinuclear activists, as a way
of overcoming the stereotypes that preclude
debate.
The government has once again thrown the question
of nuclear power in Britain into the arena
of public
debate.
To resolve the
debate, an international team
of scientists once again compared the animals»
nuclear DNA.
The
debate is part
of a larger controversy over whether or not the country should phase out its
nuclear power by 2022, as current law stipulates.
The generation - long
debate surrounding the dumping
of the nation's radioactive
nuclear waste under Nevada's Yucca Mountain may finally be drawing to a close.
Macfarlane is a veteran
of nuclear power policy
debates.
Whether or not the NRC approves plans for Yucca Mountain won't resolve the larger
debate,
of course, but perhaps the greenlighting
of other promising alternative energy sources could ultimately make
nuclear power unnecessary altogether.
But the issues thrown up are still arousing passions today, as witnessed by further arguments in favour
of using tidal power in the Severn and
debate over the UK government's recent go - ahead for the Hinkley Point
nuclear power plant in Somerset.
There is no public
debate on the future
of Britain's
nuclear weapons designers.
Scientists
debate whether hunting, farming, smallpox or the
nuclear bomb define the start
of irreversible human impacts on our planet
And Britain needs informed
debate on the future
of our
nuclear weapons laboratory.