Not exact matches
Meitner's work in elucidating the process
of nuclear fission in 1938 is
well accepted by her fellow physicists — but Otto Hahn, who won the 1944 Nobel Prize in Chemistry «for his discovery
of the
fission of heavy nuclei,» barely acknowledged her contribution.
Together, the new experimental and theoretical studies will give us a much
better understanding
of nuclear fission, which can help improve the performance and safety
of nuclear reactors.
By far the most rigorously researched
of the Tintin stories, it features
nuclear fission, the effects
of gravitation in space and why meteorites make lunar craters, as
well as side references in Professor Calculus's log book to the «constant
of solar radiation» and the «limits
of the solar spectrum in the ultraviolet».
And that means there may be two direct paths for radioactive particle byproducts
of nuclear fission, such as cesium 137 and iodine 131, to escape and spread radiation — cracks in containment as
well as the spent fuel pools now open to the air.
Today's
nuclear reactors do dramatically
better by splitting uranium atoms through
fission, but they still fail to extract more than 0.08 percent
of their energy.
Well, if we think that cleaner modes
of delivering power will help, then it is falling down obvious that we should be using
nuclear fission.
He leads the Fuel Material and Chemistry Focus Area
of the Consortium for Advanced Simulation
of Light Water Reactors, a DOE Energy Innovation Hub, as
well as Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) projects on plasma surface interactions and
fission gas behavior in
nuclear fuel.
Okoshi also found inspiration in the work
of Mark Toby... Is it reading too much into the relationship
of this postwar period and the Japanese - ancestry if not nationality
of several
of these artists, to offer that Yellow Slow (by Kawabata) is a shape that could have expressed
nuclear fission as
well as a phenomenon
of perception?
This 70 % increase in energy requirements may
well come from sustainable energy and
nuclear fission power perhaps but that still leaves present levels
of carbon release unchanged.
Dave wrote in Comment 9: ``... they will keep putting those new coal - fired energy plants online or create
nuclear fission plants that create waste that can't be disposed
of» and «Wind / Solar et al. is nice but is getting no funding and going nowhere fast right now, not to mention the fact that it might not do us much
good anyway on the kind
of unsustainable economic scales we (at least Americans) want to live at.»
Nuclear fission, as you all know better than I, as a long term alternative to fossil fuels, depends on development and wide use of nuclear breeder reactors with concomitant problems of proliferation of atomic weapons mat
Nuclear fission, as you all know
better than I, as a long term alternative to fossil fuels, depends on development and wide use
of nuclear breeder reactors with concomitant problems of proliferation of atomic weapons mat
nuclear breeder reactors with concomitant problems
of proliferation
of atomic weapons materials.
Well, if we think that cleaner modes
of delivering power will help, then it is falling down obvious that we should be using
nuclear fission.