Today, there are thousands
of observation points around the world at different locations, at different wavelengths, different resolutions.
«Our synthesis of data from a large number
of observation points across the globe is unique and serves an important need.»
In a weekly climate - focused newsletter, the SEPP argued that, «given poor geographic coverage of the surface - air observations, the movement
of observation points on the surface, and the frequent manipulation of the data by the reporting entities, not clearly publically disclosed, the margin of error is likely to be well above + / - 0.1 deg C and it is actually unknown.»
«Our synthesis of data from a large number
of observation points across the globe is unique and serves an important need.»
If this index grows in linear fashion, the sum
of the observation points is 80,000; divided by 5, that produces an average appreciation of 16,000.
Then, as the ionospheric response evolves and recovers on its own time scales, STIM estimates the time delay in the ionospheric storm onset and formulates the ionospheric storm - time response by taking into account the latitude and the LT
of the observation point at the storm onset.
Not exact matches
That last
point touches upon another
observation made by BAML — that while stocks certainly look pricey, certain areas
of the market are actually attractively priced, at least compared with recent months.
Both
observations kind
of miss the
point.
As I
point out in the video, his
observations showed the masses
of clusters were too large, but the numbers he got were far too high, and we now know they must have been in error (or, to be more fair, his uncertainties were too large).
This comes out to a 60 % growth rate, but the figure changes significantly based on the
observation points: if the index experiences very slow growth for most
of the term, only to see rapid growth late in the term, then the average appreciation will decrease, since 67,500 divided by 5 is 13,500, or 35 % growth.
But MacIntyre's
observation also shows why, for non-emotivists, such surveys must always issue in a complete non sequitur: one does not abrogate the Ten Commandments by
pointing to the number
of murders in Detroit, or the divorce rate in Reno, or the decline in church attendance in Peoria.
Critics
of Intelligent Falling
point out that gravity is a provable law based on empirical
observations of natural phenomena.
It's to the
point with some Christian posters here that any criticism
of their actions and religious beliefs garners the immediate judgment that the person doing so is being hateful when, in reality, they are only fulfilling that very same Bible
observation made by Jesus.
Jeff, I agree with your initial
observation... and I guess for me this is also kind
of the
point in that, at some stage (hopefully), we are able to evaluate in a different way because we also become aware
of all (or at least some!)
But should
observation on few general issues, The site style is wonderful, the articles is in
point of fact excellent: D. Excellent process, cheers
The
point is you speak
of things as FACT and then something changes by 14 BILLION YEARS in a distance
of 347 miles from the Earth
observation to Orbit, and you just say OH well that's science for ya.
I think his
observations are valid; I am not an evangelical Christian but I have, at one
point or another, heard ALL
of these terms and practices he describes from friends, acquaintances, and commentators on boards like this one who are «born again.»
I am often puzzled though why she only flirts with the idea
of connecting to mainline, historic, liturgical christianity and doesn't fully embrace the inclination towards which so many
of her essays and
observations point?
How was Isaiah able to know that the earth is like a «circle» long in advance
of actual
observation, such as when the Apollo astronauts confirmed that the earth was indeed round in July 1969 from their vantage
point on the moon?
• Murasaki Shikibu, The Diary
of Lady Murasaki: Needless to say, The Tale
of Genji is the greatest literary achievement
of the glorious Heian period
of Japanese high culture, and one
of the greatest novels ever written, and so I win no
points for needless obscurity here, but having recommended Lady Sarashina's journal above, I would be remiss in failing to recommend Lady Murasaki's equally (but very differently) lovely collection
of vignettes and meditations and acute
observations (and gossip).
There is one further
point to be made, however, to bring these remarks into relation with the deepest insights
of the Christian tradition in its best moments, and into relation with the convictions
of the wisest men and women — past and present, in our own family,
of our own acquaintance or within our own awareness and
observation.
I prefaced my comment with the
observation that none
of you ever address my
point, and you are no different.
She
points to my
observation of the Levitical purity codes and my highly literal interpretation
of praising my husband at the city gate as examples
of violating these interpretive principles.
When Friedrich Nietzsche, in his several tirades against Christianity,
points to these elements as
of the essence
of the biblical tradition, he is certainly correct — though not in the dark conclusions he draws from the
observation,
And finally, an important
observation is furnished by Bronislaw Malinowski, who describes the transition from ordinary human experience to religious experience and belief as a «breaking
point» to which the human organism reacts in spontaneous outbursts, and in which rudimentary modes
of behavior and rudimentary beliefs are engendered.15
The
point is that science is merely man's
OBSERVATIONS of the world around him > The Bible claims to be something more.
One could also subjectively
point to the conformity
of Scotus» theology with personal experience
of God and
observation of creation.
So Luke loses the
point altogether, thinking it has something to do with the incompatibility
of new and old, and Thomas simply summarizes the simile without concern for the original
point of departure in
observation of life.
Firstly, it must be remembered, that he disclaims very early in the book that he can only speak for the mainline denominations with which he is familiar, and although my memory may fail me, he implies that he can only speak for his
observations of the churches / leaders with whom he is familiar, and also that he may be wrong, and also, that he is only
pointing out what he calls a possible cause for the problems he has seen, and hopes that his suggestions / ideas, will be considered, researched, etc, and that time will tell if his thesis bears any truth or not.
What is often called «direct
observation» is in
point of fact a highly sophisticated mental function in which the causal impact
of objects on the observer is interpreted selectively by observers according to their purposes.
Now, you can present the existence
of a deity responsible for the creation
of the universe as a hypothesis for the
observation that the universe exists, but the whole
point of a hypothesis is that you test it to see if it's accurate.
At one
point, in what appears a clever lawyerlike play, Pagels discredits Augustine's doctrine
of the literal fall
of Adam and Eve with the
observation that it is hopelessly unscientific, and as a historian she feels compelled to add that Augustine's great foe, Pelagius, would also have had no use for science.
In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely certain starting
point; the idea that those elements
of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all
of our descriptions
of our
observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus
of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most
of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself).
More disturbing are the
observations of Jenny McCartney who
points to the problematic nature
of using the Irish Troubles as the basis for «triumph
of the underdog» narratives.
More to the
point, for educators in these troubled times, is David Griffin's trenchant
observation that those who seek to improve the human condition dare not ignore the transcultural proclivity to evil deep within the human heart and the strong element
of competition in finite existence.
For a long time now the Christian understanding
of man has been obscured by theories
of his nature built on other dogmas than that
of the sovereignty
of God and constructed out
of observations of his behavior made from other
points of view than those
of Christian faith.
My
point is not that this suggests the possibility
of positive support for Whitehead's notion
of a variety
of cosmic epochs (on his own theory
of perception, it must be impossible for us to make
observations of another epoch); my
point is the negative one that generalizations from available astronomical data to uniformity throughout the universe may be precarious.
Here are my first random
observations in search
of a
point:
When the two theories yielded different views
of the simultaneity
of distant events, both parties could retreat to
observations on which they concurred, namely the simultaneity
of two signals reaching a single
point.
Now the
point toward which my remarks are intended to argue is that the canons
of reason and
observation within a postliberal theology must assume a far humbler role than was observed or exercised by an earlier liberalism.
That said, these
observations are not intended to highlight any sins
of omission
of Gaine's part, but to
point to the considerable depth and value
of how his findings might unfold for us today, if we are convinced by his resolute conviction that the Saviour did, indeed, see the Father.
The second is to remain part
of the public conversation, but only with sardonic
observations: merrily
pointing out the perpetual follies
of the world, and branding as naïve any Christian foolish enough to believe they might actually change it.
To deny something without any basis in fact when simple
observation points to root struggle for existence in every creature reflects more a heart
of stone than a mind
of intelligence.
Yet the key
point for Catholic thinkers to acknowledge is that the philosophy
of science from Bacon right through to modernity has shown that the success
of modern experimental
observation does challenge Aristotelian - Scholastic «natures».
These
observations also
point to the role
of mathematics in the making
of persons.
However, upon comparing
observations, it will become evident to the respective observers that some
of the «
points» in their space correspond (to a greater or lesser degree) to
points in their neighbors» mappings as well.
In using Sacks» profound
observations on an extreme neurological disorder, I have tried to
point to dimensions
of identity / community that need to be considered by Sandel.
Of course, for practical purposes we regard the position from which we make an
observation as a fixed
point, but this is an arbitrary choice on our part.
The reintegration
of science, metaphysics and theology lies in the direction
of showing that
observation gives rise to questions that science answers, but that these themselves raise questions that call for metaphysical responses, and that these in turn
point to a different kind
of explanation which, though ultimate, is also personal.
Yet the Catholic tradition disagrees with the «isn't derived from
observation of the world»
point.