Thus my plea to the modelers: please mention the name
of the observational dataset in your legend.
Last week's post on Realclimate raised a couple of issues which imply that both the choice
of observational dataset and the chosen pre-industrial baseline period can influence the conclusion of how much warming the Earth has experienced to date.
Not exact matches
«We overcame this challenge by trying to push the
observational science to the highest resolutions, allowing us to more readily compare observations across
datasets,» said Nicholas Schmerr, the study's co-author and an assistant research scientist in geology at the University
of Maryland.
This session examined the biogeochemical processes that are likely to affect the evolution
of the Earth system over the coming decades, with a focus on the dynamics
of marine and terrestrial ecosystems and the development
of improved understanding through (a) fieldwork and laboratory experiments, (b) development
of new
observational datasets, both modern and palaeo, and (c) simulations using numerical models.
In short, irrespective
of what
observational dataset was used — it's likely that an estimate
of forced response made in 2014 would be biased cold, which on its own would translate to an overestimate
of the available budget
of about 40GtC.
There are very good scientific reasons for using
observational datasets that fill in data sparse regions in many analyses — I will continue using them — but we should be aware
of not only their strengths but also
of their weaknesses.
Part
of the story here is that it is this very sort
of very careful work done by John Kennedy and Phil Jones and other colleagues working on these
datasets that has allowed us to start challenging the models and our understanding in such a detailed way — in some ways it is quite remarkable that the
observational data is now good enough to identify this level
of detail in how the climate varies and changes.
b) when used with the HadCM2 - derived surface control data covariance matrix from the SFZ 2008 data, which I have largely been able to agree to raw data from the HadCM2 AOGCM control run (which data Dr Forest has confirmed was used for the Forest 2006 main results), the CSF 2005 surface model and
observational data produces, irrespective
of which upper air and deep - ocean
dataset is used, a strongly peaked PDF for climate sensitivity, centred close to S = 1, not S = 3 as per Forest 2006.
In summary, I have copies
of datasets used in two studies related to Forest 2006, both
of which should contain the same temperature data as used in Forest 2006 (save for the deep - ocean
observational data).
And as I understand it they are a compilation and pasteurisation and cleansing and adjustment
of a lot
of different
observational datasets.
Morice, C. P., J. J. Kennedy, N. A. Rayner, and P. D. Jones, 2012: Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble
of observational estimates: The HadCRUT4
dataset.
«Direct
observational data on surface air temperature are sparse for the Antarctic, but none
of the
datasets examined provides evidence
of net warming south
of 60 ° S since 1979, a period during which sea - ice extent increased a little.»
Observational analyses do suggest a link between heavy precipitation and storm surge, but the available
dataset was too short to explore the statistical relationships in a relevant part
of the frequency distribution.
Accounting for the considerable disagreement among satellite - era
observational datasets on the distribution
of snow water equivalent, CanESM2 has too much springtime snow cover over the Canadian land mass, reflecting a broader Northern Hemisphere positive bias.
and later: «With the exception
of one SR case (RSS TLT) out
of 18, none
of the directly - measured
observational datasets is consistent with the — best estimate ‖
of the IPCC AR4 [12] model - mean.
For each
observational dataset and the historical portion
of each CESM - LE simulation, we compute monthly anomalies by subtracting the long - term (1920 — 2012) monthly means from the corresponding month
of each year.
Surely it's obvious that most meteorology is based on (and validated against) a large
observational dataset, and the day to day transitions
of the past are a large part
of predicting tomorrow from yesterday.
For the thirty - year period 1979 to 2009 the
observational datasets find in the tropical lower troposphere (LT) a warming trend
of 0.07 °C to 0.15 °C per decade.
The experts you selectively quote say» it is not clear whether the difference is a result
of common biases in GCMs, biases in
observational datasets, or both», whereas you make your own conclusion and suggest that the radiosonde are correct and everything else is wrong.
Morice, C. P., J. J. Kennedy, N. A. Rayner, and P. D. Jones (2012), Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble
of observational estimates: The HadCRUT4
dataset, J. Geophys.
Po Chedley say: «The apparent model -
observational difference for tropical upper tropospheric warming represents an important problem, but it is not clear whether the difference is a result
of common biases in GCMs, biases in
observational datasets, or both.»
This study addresses the challenge by undertaking a formal detection and attribution analysis
of SCE changes based on several
observational datasets with different structural characteristics, in order to account for the substantial
observational uncertainty.
However, CI failed to reproduce the distribution and BCSD and BCSDX the timing
of winter 7 day low flow events, regardless
of reanalysis or
observational dataset.
The simulations were evaluated using the spline - interpolated
dataset ANUSPLIN, a daily
observational gridded surface temperature and precipitation product with a nominal resolution
of approximately 10 km.
Non-stationarity in the
observational / reanalysis
datasets complicated the evaluation
of downscaling performance.
The skill
of the downscaling methods generally depended on reanalysis and gridded
observational dataset.
«Evidence for climate change in the satellite cloud record» «Cloud feedback mechanisms and their representation in global climate models» «A net decrease in the Earth's cloud, aerosol, and surface 340 nm reflectivity during the past 33 yr (1979 — 2011)» «New
observational evidence for a positive cloud feedback that amplifies the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation» «Impact
of dataset choice on calculations
of the short - term cloud feedback»
The first set
of simulations, referred to as Global Atmosphere - Global Ocean (GOGA) experiments, are forced with prescribed SST and sea ice concentrations from the
observational datasets of Hurrell et al. (2008) for 1979 — 2008, with different initial conditions for each ensemble member.
Using a collaborative Wiki framework, the goal
of reanalyses.org is to facilitate comparison between reanalysis and
observational datasets.
While such models lack adequate
observational datasets of subsurface soil properties and / or geology, it is clear that the time scale for deep permafrost thaw is measured in centuries, not years.
They are perhaps the largest uncertainty in our understanding
of climate change, owing to disagreement among climate models and
observational datasets over what cloud changes have occurred during recent decades and will occur in response to global warming2, 3.
«Using state -
of - the - art
observational datasets and results from a large archive
of computer mode simulations, a consortium
of scientists from 12 different institutions has resolved a long - standing conundrum in climate science»
The
dataset employs the latest analysis techniques and takes advantage
of digitised
observational data to provide a daily record
of Australian temperatures over the last 100 years.
It is difficult to digitise the Figure 8.18 values for years affected by volcanic eruptions, so I have also adjusted the widely - used RCP4.5 forcings
dataset to reflect the Section 7.5.3
observational estimate
of current aerosol forcing, using Figure 8.18 and Table 8.7 data to update the projected RCP4.5 forcings for 2007 — 2011 where appropriate.
This study explores the causes
of the recent decline
of Atlantic major hurricane frequency over the period 2005 - 2015, using various
observational datasets and modeling results from a 500 - year control simulation
of a fully coupled earth system model, GFD's ESM2G.
Thorne et al. (2007) suggested that the absence
of the mid-tropospheric warming might be attributable to uncertainties in the observed record: however, Douglass et al. (2007) responded with a detailed statistical analysis demonstrating that the absence
of the projected degree
of warming is significant in all
observational datasets.
, which are in fact the excess
of AFari + aci over RFari, need adjusting (scaling down by (0.73 − 0.4) / (0.9 − 0.4), all years) to obtain a forcing
dataset based on a purely
observational estimate
of aerosol AF rather than the IPCC's composite estimate.
The State
of the UK Climate report is an annual publication which provides an accessible, authoritative and up - to - date assessment
of UK climate trends, variations and extremes based on the latest available climate quality
observational datasets.
The greater rate
of warming in the tropical mid-troposphere that is projected by general - circulation models is absent in this and all other
observational datasets, whether satellite or radiosonde.
The basic
observational result seems to be similar to what we can produce but use
of slightly different
datasets, such as the EBAF CERES
dataset, changes the results to be somewhat less in magnitude.
I prefer to use a reanalysis product as the base rather than gridded
observational datasets because the reanalysis product provides a dynamically consistent gridded state estimation that includes assimilation
of available surface and satellite observations.