However, an «inconvenient truth» for proponents
of ocean iron fertilization is that stimulation of phytoplankton blooms is only the first step in any successful ocean fertilization effort.
Not exact matches
During her half - hour
of interaction with the class, McNutt said, students asked questions ranging from the feasibility
of the OTEC, or
Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion — a strategy for harvesting energy from the oceans — to whether deforestation in Africa «might actually have a silver lining if it leads to ocean iron fertilization.&r
Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion — a strategy for harvesting energy from the
oceans — to whether deforestation in Africa «might actually have a silver lining if it leads to
ocean iron fertilization.&r
ocean iron fertilization.»
In that project, US entrepreneur Russ George convinced a Haida Nation village to pursue
iron fertilization to boost salmon populations, with the potential to sell carbon credits based on the amount
of CO2 that would be sequestered in the
ocean.
Ocean iron fertilization: Moving forward in a sea
of uncertainty.
Possible mechanisms include (iv)
fertilization of phytoplankton growth in the Southern
Ocean by increased deposition of iron - containing dust from the atmosphere after being carried by winds from colder, drier continental areas, and a subsequent redistribution of limiting nutrients; (v) an increase in the whole ocean nutrient content (e.g., through input of material exposed on shelves or nitrogen fixation); and (vi) an increase in the ratio between carbon and other nutrients assimilated in organic material, resulting in a higher carbon export per unit of limiting nutrient expo
Ocean by increased deposition
of iron - containing dust from the atmosphere after being carried by winds from colder, drier continental areas, and a subsequent redistribution
of limiting nutrients; (v) an increase in the whole
ocean nutrient content (e.g., through input of material exposed on shelves or nitrogen fixation); and (vi) an increase in the ratio between carbon and other nutrients assimilated in organic material, resulting in a higher carbon export per unit of limiting nutrient expo
ocean nutrient content (e.g., through input
of material exposed on shelves or nitrogen fixation); and (vi) an increase in the ratio between carbon and other nutrients assimilated in organic material, resulting in a higher carbon export per unit
of limiting nutrient exported.
From these relationships and reconstructed temperature time series, we diagnose glacial − interglacial time series
of dust radiative forcing and
iron fertilization of ocean biota, and use these time series to force Earth system model simulations.
If I did, I'd drop $ 200 million on Bussard (I'm sure he'd enjoy that); $ 200 million on kickstarting a vertical farming industry, the same on
ocean iron -
fertilization studies, another chunk on developing an agrichar infrastructure, and the rest on various projects that can't get funding because they have a low probability
of success, but massive payoff if they do work.
What are your views on experiments testing whether
fertilization of mineral - starved regions
of the
oceans with
iron could serve to pull carbon dioxide out
of the atmosphere?
Think
of the baggage / luggage conveyer systems at airports, one blocked piece
of lugguage affects & backs up the entire conveyer system, which offsets an even balance, like our
oceans, from this
iron fertilization!
Examples
of papers confirming that
fertilization of the
oceans by
iron could have played a role in ice ages: Moore et al. (2000); Kohfeld et al. (2005); Abelmann et al. (2006); Martínez - Garcia et al. (2011).
As researchers concluded in a new study published in Geophysical Research Letters,
ocean iron fertilization can only prove successful as a climate geoengineering approach if, in addition to phytoplankton bloom stimulation, «a proportion
of the particulate organic carbon (POC) produced must sink down the water column and reach the main thermocline or deeper before being remineralized... and the third phase is long - term sequestration
of the carbon at depth out
of contact with the atmosphere.»
This paper considers the practicalities, opportunities and threats associated with one
of the earliest proposed carbon - removal techniques: large - scale
ocean fertilization, achieved by adding
iron or other nutrients to surface waters.
After all,
ocean fertilization — spreading
iron slurry across the seas to persuade them to soak up more carbon dioxide — means changing the chemical composition and biological functioning
of the
oceans.
They include
ocean iron fertilization and sulfate aerosol spraying, each
of which now has a scientific - commercial constituency.
There have been
iron fertilization experiments
of the
ocean before, many of them, in the equatorial Pacific, the Southern Ocean, and the North Pac
ocean before, many
of them, in the equatorial Pacific, the Southern
Ocean, and the North Pac
Ocean, and the North Pacific.
Blain, S. Effect
of natural
iron fertilization on carbon sequestration in the Southern
Ocean.
Modelers have long ago concluded that
iron fertilization of the
ocean can play only a small role in managing the carbon cycle in the coming century.
But the change in carbon chemistry
of the
ocean and ultimately the atmosphere need to be transparently documented, also, if we are to trade carbon offsets based on
iron fertilization.
EFFECT
OF NATURAL IRON FERTILIZATION ON CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN THE SOUTHERN OCEAN Nature, Vol 446 26 April 2007 doi: 10.1038 / nature05700 The efficiency of fertilization, defined as the ratio of the carbon export to the amount of iron supplied, was at least ten times higher than previous estimates from short - term blooms induced by iron - addition experiment
OF NATURAL
IRON FERTILIZATION ON CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN THE SOUTHERN OCEAN Nature, Vol 446 26 April 2007 doi: 10.1038 / nature05700 The efficiency of fertilization, defined as the ratio of the carbon export to the amount of iron supplied, was at least ten times higher than previous estimates from short - term blooms induced by iron - addition experime
IRON FERTILIZATION ON CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN THE SOUTHERN
OCEAN Nature, Vol 446 26 April 2007 doi: 10.1038 / nature05700 The efficiency
of fertilization, defined as the ratio of the carbon export to the amount of iron supplied, was at least ten times higher than previous estimates from short - term blooms induced by iron - addition experiment
of fertilization, defined as the ratio
of the carbon export to the amount of iron supplied, was at least ten times higher than previous estimates from short - term blooms induced by iron - addition experiment
of the carbon export to the amount
of iron supplied, was at least ten times higher than previous estimates from short - term blooms induced by iron - addition experiment
of iron supplied, was at least ten times higher than previous estimates from short - term blooms induced by iron - addition experime
iron supplied, was at least ten times higher than previous estimates from short - term blooms induced by
iron - addition experime
iron - addition experiments.
Sequestering carbon in these parts
of the global
ocean via
iron fertilization «would require significant ecosystem change,» Trull's paper said.
-- Southern
Ocean Iron Fertilization Experiment (SOFeX)-- The basics
of the most recent expedition — Penny Chisholm's site, which lists many professional papers — Paul Falkowski's article (PDF document)-- DOE article: Climate Change Scenarios Compel Studies
of Ocean Carbon Storage — Government site for carbon sequestration research — An earlier piece Williams wrote on sequestration — Will
Ocean Fertilization To Remove Carbon Dioxide from the Atmosphere Work?
Kim Stanley Robinson's wildly successful 1993 science fiction trilogy about geo - engineering and terraforming, Red Mars, Green Mars, Blue Mars, describes «the
fertilization of the Antarctic
Ocean with
iron dust, which was to act as a dietary supplement to phytoplankton» as a cure for both global warming and dying coral reefs.
In that project, US entrepreneur Russ George convinced a Haida Nation village to pursue
iron fertilization to boost salmon populations, with the potential to sell carbon credits based on the amount
of CO2 that would be sequestered in the
ocean.
The 2012
iron fertilization generated an algae bloom that fed salmon at the right time to boost the salmon population * the salmon bloom died in days and then fell to the bottom
of the
ocean taking large amounts
of CO2 with them
Oceaneos makes the case for
iron fertilization of the
ocean.
After that come a bunch
of ocean fertilization schemes, using phosphorous, nitrogen and
iron, all
of which offer something in the region
of 0.1 - 0.2 W / m ².
During the
Ocean Iron Fertilization meeting Dr. Hauke Kite - Powell, of the Marine Policy Center at WHOI, estimated the possible future value of ocean fertilization at $ 100 billion of the emerging international carbon trading market, which has the goal of mitigating global war
Ocean Iron Fertilization meeting Dr. Hauke Kite - Powell, of the Marine Policy Center at WHOI, estimated the possible future value of ocean fertilization at $ 100 billion of the emerging international carbon trading market, which has the goal of mitigating gl
Fertilization meeting Dr. Hauke Kite - Powell,
of the Marine Policy Center at WHOI, estimated the possible future value
of ocean fertilization at $ 100 billion of the emerging international carbon trading market, which has the goal of mitigating global war
ocean fertilization at $ 100 billion of the emerging international carbon trading market, which has the goal of mitigating gl
fertilization at $ 100 billion
of the emerging international carbon trading market, which has the goal
of mitigating global warming.
The Planet Remade covers all the main proposed geoengineering techniques --(not just SAI, but also
ocean iron fertilization (OIF), marine cloud brightening (MCB), bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and direct air capture (DAC)-RRB-, outlining their history, the current state
of knowledge, and expected risks and benefits (and impressively, without descending into the alphabet soup
of all these acronyms).
A second general method for cooling the planet involves removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere, either via sequestration or CO2 capture, or possibly through
ocean iron fertilization to promote the growth
of CO2 - consuming algae.
There is strong evidence for a tight relation
of Southern
Ocean iron fertilization to this record (30, 31).
A main indirect effect is the
fertilization of ocean phytoplankton production by dust - mitigated input
of iron to the
ocean surface layer (6, 7).
To estimate the role
of time - varying,
ocean iron fertilization, we turned to the Southern Ocean, the main HNLC, iron - limited region of the global o
ocean iron fertilization, we turned to the Southern
Ocean, the main HNLC, iron - limited region of the global o
Ocean, the main HNLC,
iron - limited region
of the global
oceanocean.
Potential carbon dioxide (CO2) drawdown through dust - induced
iron fertilization of ocean biota is restricted to high - nutrient, low - chlorophyll (HNLC) regions, mainly the Southern Ocean and northern Pacific where iron is the limiting micronutrient (6,
ocean biota is restricted to high - nutrient, low - chlorophyll (HNLC) regions, mainly the Southern
Ocean and northern Pacific where iron is the limiting micronutrient (6,
Ocean and northern Pacific where
iron is the limiting micronutrient (6, 13).
Olgun, N. et al. (2011) Surface
ocean iron fertilization: The role of airborne volcanic ash from subduction zone and hot spot volcanoes and related iron flues into the Pacific O
ocean iron fertilization: The role
of airborne volcanic ash from subduction zone and hot spot volcanoes and related
iron flues into the Pacific
OceanOcean.
Far riskier is intentional acceleration
of carbon dioxide removal by enhancing the biological uptake in the
ocean through
iron fertilization.
Early climate models hinted that intentional
iron fertilization across the entire southern
Ocean could erase 1 billion to 2 billion tons
of carbon emissions each year — 10 to 25 percent
of the world's annual total.
Therefore it's my opinion that the not - so - extreme decline from April to July 2010, coupled with the higher - than - usual April value, coupled with the changes (both trend and fluctuation) in both the size
of and the timing
of the annual cycle, are such that there's insufficient evidence to conclude that the Eyjafjallajökull eruption caused a noticeable change in atmospheric CO2, whether by emissions from the eruption, the lack
of emissions from air traffic, or
iron fertilization of the
oceans.
Or what if
ocean iron fertilization really can sequester massive amounts
of carbon?
Reuters says that the ACE CRC report estimates that
ocean iron fertilization «would likely hit an absorption limit
of about 1 billion tonnes
of carbon» or about 15 %
of total carbon emissions.
While controlled
iron fertilization experiments have shown an increase in phytoplankton growth, and a temporary increase in drawdown
of atmospheric CO2, it is uncertain whether this would increase carbon transfer into the deep
ocean over the longer - term.
The
iron fertilization of the
ocean had generated optimism until an experiment earlier this year dampened hopes.
On the heels
of my last post about
iron fertilization of the
ocean, I found another interesting paper on the topic.
Based on a century
of ocean plankton science and the 10 international experiments on
iron fertilization over the last 15 years we are confident that the scale, methods and technologies
of the work we are planning will have positive impacts on all fronts, improving water quality, buffering surface water acidity, recharging the marine food chain, and safely sequestering enormous amounts
of CO2 to help slow climate change.
Lately, a growing number
of scientists have been advocating research to see if massive, manmade
iron fertilization of the
oceans might induce such blooms, and thus mitigate warming.