Whether you're a trucking company operating out
of the oil sands or you're a business dealing with transportation issues as part of your daily operations, our experienced team can work with you to determine your specific needs.
The Edmonton Journal is the leading provider of award - winning local news and results - driven advertising for a fast - growing online and print audience in the heart
of oil sands country.
Counsel for an Owner
of an oil sands project providing advice on the settlement of several multi-million dollar claims.
Aboriginal opposition to such proposals as Enbridge Inc.'s $ 6 - billion Northern Gateway pipeline has been a major stumbling block to the Harper Conservatives» aim of shipping large volumes
of oil sands - derived crude to the Pacific Coast to be exported to Asia as a way to increase returns.
It's time to stop the expansion
of the oil sands.»
The mandate of the joint review panel ensured that it focused on risks which can be mitigated without harming the pipeline or the prospect of future
of oil sands development while ignoring the larger risks that can't be so easily mitigated.
This may be due more to the nature
of the oil sands development contaminants vs those found in the other rivers??? I'm guessing O&G contaminants which tend to be nasty carcinogens amongst other things... I have to read if the evaluations of what constitutes poor or good water quality what it is based on (which contaminants etc.)... I will look at your details... Any water pro's out there that can put the details above into context?
I do not agree with the view that preventing new pipelines will do little to slow development
of the oil sands or that the development of access to foreign markets for bitumen is inevitable.
Weaver argues that the climate effects
of oil sands development will have only a small effect on global temperatures and that the potential of coal and gas consumption to contribute to serious climate change is much greater.
Media accounts and policy discussions
of oil sands and Keystone XL usually portray the adversaries as David vs. Goliath: small, underfunded environmental pressure groups taking on big, wealthy corporations.
The figure below shows forecasts
of oil sands production made by the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) every year from 2006 to 2012 (except 2009).
Meanwhile, the absolutist climate - change argument against any exploitation
of the oil sands relies on some staggering, but misleading, headline numbers.
Promoters of the pipeline were overjoyed; they could now switch their argument from claiming that the pipeline was an essential element in developing the oil sands to one in which the pipeline would make negligible difference to the development
of the oil sands and therefore have little or no effect on climate change.
In Canada you have the issue
of the oil sands; in the United States we have the issue of coal.
The NAS study deals a blow to one central safety argument made by opponents of the $ 5.3 billion Keystone XL link — that the heavier chemical components of so - called diluted bitumen make it more dangerous to ship — but made no attempt to address critics» second and more prominent concern, that a leak
of oil sands crude would pose unique challenges during cleanup as well as unique risks to marine environments.
As has become the norm, their objections were supported by over-estimates of the greenhouse gas implications
of oil sands development.
The Conference Board of Canada (not BoingBoing's favourite think tank) has released a report that says, well, yes, there is a lot of CO2 that comes out
of the oil sands, but:
The value and importance
of the oil sands will make that much harder the choices that Albertans and all Canadians suddenly face.
The proposed future development
of the oil sands constitutes a serious moral problem.
On that basis, the report concludes that while continued oil sands production will make it very hard for Canada to meet its national emission reduction targets — which again it's worth pointing out, are in line with those of the US and far far below what science says is needed to minimize the impacts of climate change — on a global basis «elimination
of oil sands GHG emissions will not eliminate or substantially lessen the immense challenge facing the world to reduce GHG emissions.»
Above is what they say on their website, but in interview in the National Post, the new head
of the oil sands producers» lobby Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers sings a different tune.
Lawrence Solomon: Over the last two decades, global warming activists succeeded in slowing the development
of the oil sands, blocking major pipelines like Keystone XL, phasing out coal plants and banning shale gas and oil projects.
Over the last two decades, global warming activists succeeded in slowing the development
of the oil sands, blocking major pipelines like Keystone XL, phasing out coal plants and banning shale gas and oil projects.
Even Pembina's - somewhat limited - opposing voice was not wanted during the tour
of the oil sands facilities, and they were not invited to the lobbyist - sponsored dinners.
In that piece, Mary Anastasia O'Grady made a compelling point about how Alberta, a center
of oil sands production in Canada, has handled the global economic slowdown better than most due in part to the Canadian government's commitment to oil sands production.
After 41 years
of oil sands mining operations in northern Alberta only 0.2 % or one square kilometer of disturbed land is certified as reclaimed.
The book examines the environmental effects
of oil sands mining in northern Alberta.
Continued development
of oil sands would also help the U.S. economy; hundreds of American companies sell oil services in Canada.
The railroads are already gearing up big - time to handle oil out
of the oil sands if a pipeline doesn't go thru.
But this one consideration — the damages associated with the additional carbon emissions
of oil sands oil — is effectively accomplished by denying the pipeline application.
The pipe would send hundreds of thousands of barrels
of oil sands bitumen from Edmonton to the port of Vancouver each day — this at a moment when oil sands production and the pipelines that move it have become the proxy for a debate about climate change and the fossil fuel industries not just across Canada but worldwide.
The Keystone XL pipeline is designed to move 830,000 barrels a day
of oil sands from Canada to the U.S. Gulf Coast where many refineries are located that are configured to process heavy oil.
But transporting oil from western Canada by pipeline is less expensive than shipping by rail, which requires specialized cars and / or specialized handling because of the very high viscosity
of oil sands oil.
3) The economics
of oil sands will probably get worse over the next few years unless there is a big technological breakthrough.
As suggested in the article, the only way to stop the development
of the oil sands (or any new oil development for that matter) is to address the supply side of the supply - demand curve, because as long as oil is at $ 90 bbl the producers will find a way to get their product to market.
And the reason that the oil and gas sector is increasing emissions so much is because of the expansion
of the oil sands.
Canadian production
of oil sands in northern Alberta is expected to reach 4.1 million barrels a day by 2020, up from last year's production level of 1.6 million barrels per day.
The province will ensure that eligible expenditures and definitions
of oil sands projects (also known as «ring fence» definition) that determine when a project has reached payout are tightly and clearly defined.
Generally speaking, upstream emissions are small relative to consumption emissions, but, in the case
of the oil sands, emissions associated with the production of the bitumen are much higher than for conventional oils.
Regulations have not been developed for the CHOPS method
of oil sands production being used by Baytex.
Despite the rapid growth
of the oil sands industry, and plans to build or expand more than 10,000 miles of pipelines in the next few years, federal pipeline regulations don't distinguish between dilbit and conventional crude oil.
For Canada's part, hydrogen could play a critical role in the future development
of oil sands in a climate - responsible manner.
As a growing source of carbon emissions, slowing the expansion
of oil sands is an important step.»
According to Levant, «If we actually want to make the world a better place, a more moral place, the ethical thing to do is to pump as much oil as we possibly can out
of the oil sands, knowing that every barrel we produce in Canada displaces a fascist barrel from Saudi Arabia, a misogynist barrel from Iran and a dictatorial barrel from Venezuela.»
The Nebraska hearing follows a similar affair held in Washington for the House energy committee, where Canadian climate economist Mark Jaccard testified that, despite the conclusion in the State Department's Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS), «The denial of Keystone XL will help to slow development
of the oil sands.
She said that the aftereffects
of oil sands drilling that would come along with the expansion of the pipeline would likely desecrate the freshwater Ogallala Aquifer near her homelands in Pine Ridge, S.D. «It is with great honor that I come here today to ask President Obama to stand with us for Mother Earth against Father Greed,» Plume said.
She said that the aftereffects
of oil sands drilling that would come along with the expansion of the pipeline would likely desecrate the freshwater Ogallala Aquifer near her homelands in Pine Ridge, S.D.
Having grown up in the oil sands region, she witnessed the impacts
of oil sands development on her Nation's people, culture, and land.
Both CAPP and Conference Board studies are spun to make the benefits
of oil sands developments appear to be more evenly widespread throughout Canada than they are.
Melina is a Lubicon Cree from Northern Alberta, and an Indigenous and environmental activist who knows the reality
of the oil sands too well.