It is also conceivable that Malick is not so simply attempting to express his reverence for life through the eyes
of an omnipotent being no one can fully grasp.
Religion is defined as the belief or worship
of an omnipotent being, especially with of Gods.
It is their «concept» of right and wrong we are experiencing and not
that of an omnipotent being.
Rule B is meant to entail that it is within the power
of an omnipotent being to eliminate all instances of evil.
Since all agree that a world devoid of evil is consistently describable, it is thus supposed that it is within the power
of an omnipotent being to bring about a world devoid of evil.
However, if we now agree that Premise X is only metaphysically false (and not logically false), i.e., if we agree that it is only metaphysically impossible (and not logically impossible) for one being's activities to be completely determined by another, given the analysis of «X is omnipotent» with which we have been working, there would be no apparent reason for supposing that it is not within the power
of an omnipotent being to completely determine each of the activities of all other beings and thus to bring about a world devoid of evil.
How about you should be smarter than to trust anyone who claims to know the mind
of an omnipotent being that does not exist.
There's a big universe out there, but you've got to expand your mind past the arrogant crap that there's some kind
of omnipotent being out there that was so negligent as to leave his «prized creations» alone with an agent of «his» biggest nemesis in «Paradise», while they were mentally no more than toddlers, having no «knowledge of good and evil».
not much
of an Omnipotent being is he.
Now... if you'd like to discuss the nature
of an omnipotent being who finds it necessary to coerce bows out of his own creations, and whether or not such a being deserves to be worshipped by anyone or anything, we can certainly discuss that.
Not exact matches
It
is the same
omnipotent vibe emerging in dangerous ways in other parts
of their lives.
Those that seek to look powerful have no choice but to sacrifice efficiency because the primal response
of looking powerful
is to look «big,» or
omnipotent.
Yet somehow, despite policy failures that
are made obvious by the lowest interest rates ever recorded in human history, a persistent narrative still dominates financial markets: all - knowing,
omnipotent central bankers
are still in full control
of the situation and will do «whatever it takes» to maintain order.
I pray to whichever holy name (God, Allah, Jehovah, Krishna, Jesus, etc.) suits the ONE Omniscient, Omnipresent,
Omnipotent being that ignorance
is wiped away from our species and we become a closer, more loving, peaceful creature and that we realize how much time we waste and how much further we push our fellow neighbor and brother under God, regardless
of creed, away debating over who
's God
is better and discover the error
of our ways before we destroy each other... before it
's too late, because The End
is Nigh!!!!! LOL!!!!! Really though, isn't the world full
of enough tragedy, and aren't their so many more important things that need our energy and attention like the innocent children in Pakistan dying from diseases from the flood or the homeless children in our own country, or the lack
of education, which
is exactly what leads to this kind
of debate?
Your other mistake here
is that you see the essential strangess
of the problem but believe that an
omnipotent being floating in a void solves the issue
of strangeness.
All
of the destruction and misery that this supposedly
omnipotent and benevolent god promotes and fosters
is not in keeping with the type
of universe I want to live in.
I treat others the way I would want to
be treated, because I know the result
of harming others, not because some
omnipotent «eye in the sky»
is always watching me.
As Far fetched as an
omnipotent and all powerful
being seeking the adoration
of his created people's, who could do ANYTHING to get it, deciding to have his son
be born, persecuted and killed, raise him, and have these people eat his body once a week to remember?
I
am just pointing out that IF there
were a god with even sort
of the resume Jehovah has
been said to have, ie omniscient,
omnipotent and omnibenevolent, and if this god somehow cranked out a human son, that son wouldn't act like the drunken alpha ape described in Revelations.
Church attendance
is also for my benefit (
omnipotent God already knows i believe in Him), a way for me to take comfort in the shared faith
of my neighbors when my belief in the goodness
of people starts to slip.
Is your «god» fully in control
of events, or do you have one
of those less than
omnipotent gods...
If God
is omniscient,
omnipotent, benevolent, etc then the amount
of knowledge required to
be aware and know something like the magnitude
of the possibilities I brought up would
be immense, much more in line with the characteristics attributed to God.
Again, you
are proposing the existence
of an
omnipotent, benevolent
being.
For comparison, «sacrifice»
of a «son» by an «
omnipotent» «god» as a requirement to «save» anyone
is complete nonsense, as
is the entire Christian religion.
======= @Bob «Chad, why
is it that your
omnipotent skydaddy can't come up with a better means
of communication than a book?
For example: «
Is the claim that an
omnipotent God made man out
of dirt retarded or not?»
Keep in mind that this
is supposed to
be an
OMNIPOTENT god, capable
of acting in ANY way he chooses.
Chad, why
is it that your
omnipotent skydaddy can't come up with a better means
of communication than a book?
The proprietor
of the shop obviously has the right to offer this type
of discount, but it
's sad that in this backwards, demon - haunted country we
're still treating a work
of fiction supposedly handed down by an magical,
omnipotent being as a framework for a moral life, rather than embracing an objective, secular view
of morality.
He
is omnipotent but he couldn't think
of a better way to accomplish this?
Why
is it that your
omnipotent skydaddy can't come up with a better means
of communication than a book?
Thus one
of the more odious characters in the novel, a regime stooge whose job
is to break the will
of «thought criminals,» explains that if Big Brother and the
omnipotent Party say so, two plus two doesn't necessarily equal four: «Sometimes they
are five.
If this
were not the case, then Satan would have the powers
of an independent
omnipotent being, something Christian doctrine doesn't allow.
Conservatives value property for its own sake,
of course; but they value it even more because without it all men and women
are at the mercy
of an
omnipotent government.
When an
omnipotent, omniscient god could have dealt with the problem in a much more immediate way, does it really make sense to wait a couple
of decades for the child to
be born, grow up, and start a ministry?
For instance, in the case
of Moses, when he confronted God in Exodus 32:11 - 13 after God had threatened to destroy Israel for their sins, Moses confronts God and recounts the promises that God made to Abraham, Isaac, and Israel to multiply them and give them the land as an inheritance forever — and this
was exactly what God intended him to do, intercede for God's people —
of course God did not forget His promises that He had made to His people, but with the threatening
of an
omnipotent God, Moses
was even more resolved to lead this people in righteousness.
«become as little children, and believe that salvation
was, and
is, and
is to come, in and through the atoning blood
of Christ, the Lord
Omnipotent.»
Christianity — the belief
of «nothing created an
omnipotent, omniscient,
being out
of nothing just to then create the entire universe out
of nothing for a specific creature he created from dirt on a specific planet».
An
omnipotent force that
is beyond our understanding
is one answer for how what we know as matter, the building block
of everything, came to
be.
Surely this
is not beyond the abilities
of an
omnipotent creator.
fred, Any idea how an omniscient
omnipotent being that created the 100's
of billions
of galaxies, ours with 100's
of billions
of star systems, provided his word to so few humans over the last few millennia?
Your book that
is supposed to
be the word
of your
omnipotent god has 2 CONTRADICTORY versions
of how it all happened!!!
Many have seen the horrors
of war and return knowing that no just, loving, compassionate,
omnipotent, and omnipresent
being would ever allow those things to occur.
fred, They
were atheists as far as your god
is concerned, but I think the point
was why couldn't an omniscient and
omnipotent god have made itself known on all continents before the European invasion
of the New Worlds?
«If the New Testament books really
were inspired by an
omnipotent God, why
was He unable to prevent their
being changed within decades
of being written, by people acting in His name?»
The point
is you claim that your god
is omniscient and
omnipotent so therefore knows
of amputees and could heal them, you also claim that prayer works (even though an omniscient god should
be aware
of all problems).
By definition, something
omnipotent will
be free
of wants or desires or any other emotion.
While no one
is happy that he
is dead and especially the brutal way he
was murdered, it does challenge the notion
of an
omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent god watching and tending its flock.
What
's funny,
is that believers bestow upon their god, the attributes
of being omnibenevolent,
omnipotent, and omniscient.
the life
of his only son, Jesus ---- I wonder why an
omnipotent God would only
be able to beget 1 son?