It shows, for example, how the language typical
of the oral discourse among a group of friends is different from a formal oral presentation; how the language of an oral presentation is different from a written report or argument; or how the language of science is different from the language of literature.
Texts (such as written gospels or letters) recited or orally composed in Christian worship harkened back to the immediacy
of oral discourse.
Not exact matches
What many folks seem to encourage jovially are rival bickering between young blooded humanists who banter about incessantly never judging their owned amorous infidelities and always trivializing the bitterness
of others» written and even
oral wordage... «I am what I am Sam» are the earmarks
of standalone infidels who dare not seek the fidelities
of devotional humanisms flavored austerities emanating with frugal
discourse above the plainness
of written and / or spoken dysenteries... «Bite the bullet» antagonists on both young sides might never find frugally endorsed concessions nor open their doors ever so gently...
What form criticism undertakes is to get back behind the written Gospels and their sources to the
oral tradition as it circulated prior to the writing down
of any account
of the «mighty works,» the sayings, the parables, or the
discourses of Jesus.
(10) At least two occurrences
of this condition may be differentiated in the movement from
oral discourse to the reading
of a text.
In further detail Robert Funk has analyzed the parable and the epistle as
oral speech.33 It will not take a lengthy exposure to such studies
of the lively modes
of discourse used by Jesus and the early Christian evangelists to cause the average preacher to look upon his own standardized sermon outline with a new lack
of appreciation.
The electronic age with its offering
of a wide variety
of ways to present the human voice has commanded new attention to
oral language.1 Perhaps the ascendancy
of science and the domination
of the scientific method has created such a restricted view
of language that a reaction in favor
of more dimensions to language is to be taken simply as clear testimony to a general degeneration
of meaningful
discourse, a degeneration in which the church figures prominently.
This material, partly
oral, partly written, was already in circulation in the communities before the composition
of the Gospels, and it consisted
of narratives, sayings, and other bits
of discourse (including the parables), and the Passion story.
More specifically, the researchers 1) examine possible differences by classroom, school, and literacy models; 2) explore the relationship between observable features
of the classroom literacy environment and children's literacy growth during the first grade year; 3) characterize the variability in the levels
of teacher understanding
of the chosen literacy model and
of early literacy development; and 4) assess whether there are qualitative differences in children's
oral discourse skills and writing skills with the school's chosen model
of literacy instruction.
The CALS construct is defined as a constellation
of the high - utility language skills that correspond to linguistic features prevalent in
oral and written academic
discourse across school content areas and that are infrequent in colloquial conversations (e.g., knowledge
of logical connectives, such as nevertheless, consequently; knowledge
of structures that pack dense information, such as nominalizations or embedded clauses; knowledge
of structures for organizing argumentative texts) Over the last years, as part
of the Catalyzing Comprehension Through Discussion Debate project funded by IES to the Strategic Educational Research Partnership, Dr. Paola Uccelli and her research team have produced a research - based, theoretically - grounded, and psychometrically robust instrument to measure core academic language skills (CALS - I) for students in grades 4 - 8.
For example, when one engages in an activity
of a certain KS in a certain context (like categorizing different types
of trees) particular linguistic features associated with that KS are used: vocabulary in relation to types
of trees (deciduous, coniferous), syntactic structures signaling taxonomic or part - whole relations (Y is a type
of...), and
discourse devices that connect sentences together to make the whole text —
oral or written — coherent in expressing the content meaning
of how trees are categorized.
At the University
of Houston, art history students are encouraged to develop fully their skills in the critical analysis
of art and visual culture, and to communicate their insights effectively through writing and
oral discourse.