In search
of the original quote, I must confess to having spent several hours trying to find it on the internet to no avail, despite some modest confidence in my own Googling skills.
If the rate provided at the time
of the original quote and final approval by the insurance company is different, it's likely because of one of the following reasons:
Now when I ask them why two of them told me they will not insure anyone with a pitbull or pitbull like dog the third one will but the premium is 200 %
of the original quote!?
The source
of the original quote was a Daily Tech blog post published in early January.
85 % of PolicyGenius customers pay a monthly premium that's within $ 5
of their original quote.
It pays off, too — 85 % of PolicyGenius customers have a premium within $ 5
of their original quote.
In fact, 85 % of customers who purchase a term life insurance policy through PolicyGenius pay a monthly premium that's within $ 5
of their original quote.
Part
of my original quote to Bloomberg that was left out of the article.
Not exact matches
The investment return and principal value
of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their
original cost, and current performance may be higher or lower than the performance
quoted.
The investment return and principal value
of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their
original cost and current performance may be lower or higher than the performance
quoted.
To
quote from the
original paper defining the B.G.P.: «[Imagine] a group
of generals
of the Byzantine army camped with their troops around an enemy city.
But I still stand by my
original post in which I
quote Torrance, in agreement: «I find the presence and being
of God bearing upon my experience and thought so powerfully that I can not but be convinced
of His overwhelming reality and rationality».
Similarly, mistranslation
of the greek and
quoting out
of historical, cultural and topical context has turned Paul into a misogynist when in fact he, like his Messiah, were revolutionary in their teachings, establishing in the church God's
original design for man (including the restoration
of gender equality and proper relations) which was restored through the redemptive work
of the cross.
Your
original quote was «the bible is not even close to being consistently accurate to the degree that it could be used as historical reference material» — no mention
of the word «reliable».
lol, you really are a moron... first reread that post you
quoted from me... where in that sentence does it say that latin was the
original language for the bible — it says that there was an uproar over it being printed in another language other then latin — thats because around the time
of henry the 8th the only way to view the bible was in latin... the torah is the
original bible, the new sh!t is just that, new — its an addition and thats all it will ever be!
Now that that's out
of the way... Going back to the
original quote... the raft is used until you reach enlightenment.
I don't really know much about Niebuhr but was a bit puzzled about his
quote about the empirically verifiable doctrine
of original sin.
You are free to
quote a snippet or to reference my work in your post or article,
of course, but please make sure that you link back to the
original post.
The
original author
of the above
quote was, if I'm right, a non-Muslim writing on Islam.
But they did have the Septuagint, which was a perfect Greek inspired version
of the
original Hebrew (that's why the New Testament authors
quote from it!)
[Allegedly in the «very first draft
of the Twelve Steps... This is an approximate reconstruction
of the way he first set them down» (
quoting the
original draft
of Steps 2 and 3) 1: «2.
As to your
quote above, I'm curious as to how you would define God's «
original intent
of our sexuality» and where you get this idea.
There were other issues too: The way the accounts
of Israel's monarchy contradicted one another, the way Jesus and Paul
quoted Hebrew Scripture in ways that seemed to stretch the
original meaning, the fact that women were considered property in Levitical Law, the way both science and archeology challenged the historicity
of so many biblical texts, and the fact that it was nearly impossible for me to write a creative retelling
of Resurrection Day because each
of the gospel writers tell the story so differently, sometimes with contradictory details.
However, these inspire us to look for the depth
of the
original documents it so often
quotes.
While scrupulous about checking and rechecking his quotations, Fosdick sometimes
quoted original sources from secondary reading, thereby sending out misleading signals about the expanse
of his reading.
Off the top
of my head: even though «N.T. writers» often
quote and reference O.T. passages which have
original purpose for the
original audience, it would seem there should be further purpose and meaning for the N.T. audience as well.
Some
of the posters, encouraged by CNN in its skewed headline and interesting censorship in its
quote from Ms. Rice's
original blog posting (they omitted the phrase «I remain comitted to Christ»), seem to have missed the point.
As with other pa - ssages in Josephus relating to Christian themes concern remains over whether the pa - ssage was part
of Josephus's
original text or instead a later addition — it can be dated back no further than the early 3rd century when it is
quoted by Origen in Contra Celsum.
First off, lets
quote what laurie said in the
original post,» First, I think changing sand in hawaii to the world isn't an egrecious error, isn't the heart
of the question asking to measure something that's seemingly impossible to measure?
I once questioned a Jewish Rabbi on the question
of original sin for which people often
quote Psalm 51:7.
All these
quotes are out
of context and not in the
original language, one can mistranslate.
The
original email contained excellent examples, so I
quote: «a) this past month's issue
of W had a photo shoot about camp, therefore «smore's or anything that reminds you
of camp would be appropriate!
Set up 1 - on - 1s with Dez, Mark Turgeon and the Jakes so all
of the
quotes are
original to this story.
This comment
of yours is a severe backpedal from your
original quote.
If a commercial's success can be measured by the number
of underage dorks who
quote it feverishly, then few have done better than the
original ads for Miller Lite.
Although Eleanor's
original verbiage involved inferiority, not guilt, the (mis)
quote most often used when the subject
of guilt and infant feeding arises is that «nobody can make you feel guilty without your consent.
The full Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect paper is free to access if you want to read the
original source
of the
quotes contained in this post.
Unfortunately, there's no anchor tag to link directly to the relevant portion, so you'll have to use your browser's find function with a portion
of the
quote to find it if you want to read it in the
original source.
CORRECTION: One
of the
quotes in the
original version
of this article has been changed to reflect the fact that King said «conflated,» not «inflated.»
Take the section
of the revised law
quoted above, which repeals two subdivisions
of the
original casino gambling legislation.
A number
of scientists, both those commenting and those
quoted in the
original article, said it hasn't always been this bad.
If you wish to
quote from any part
of these article, we suggest that you credit the issuing institution as the
original source
of the news release, in addition to mentioning Science Daily as the source
of any link to the corresponding article on our server.
I corrected the chapter and verse
of a Biblical quotation, I researched and found the
original source
of a
quote, and I called up the students for necessary citations.
All content on WellnessMama.com is the
original work
of the author unless otherwise noted, cited or
quoted.
The
original quote «surfing the internet for pictures
of girls» was seriously off - topic and hinted at child porn, even if unintentionally.
Also, I corrected the
original question, would you delete the
quote you made
of my
original question please?
She's also responsible for two
of my favorite
quotes: «Buy it when you love it, not when you need it» and «be a fountain and not a drain» hahaha YESSSSS to both
of those Gigi
original's.
Ray Pride
of Movie City News
quotes him in part:»... I intend to reschedule my professional activities in order to rediscover my
original enthusiasm for film.
It's a great weekend waster full
of humor, although at the end I came away with less memorable
quotes than I did with the
original, hence the score
of 8 rather than 9.
Anyway, the entire purpose
of Zoolander 2 — and any comedy sequel made more than 10 years after the
original, and comedy sequels in general — is to facilitate the repetition
of jokes from the
original film among fans who prefer to communicate their thoughts and feelings in movie -
quote form, so reference away, referencers.