Sentences with phrase «of other member states»

(a) disseminate information on the legal systems and law of other Member States of the European Union, such as by setting up courses on comparative law;

When Britain leaves the EU there will be several million citizens of other Member States living in the UK, and probably around a million UK citizens living elsewhere in the EU.

[4] Of course, this approach would prove in practice rather impossible bearing in mind the different language versions of EU legislation as well as the not so feasible consulting case - law and practice of the courts of the other Member States on the matter.

Quite to the contrary, this was strongly supported by key member states such as France, the United Kingdom and the United States against the interests of other member states!

It does not impact Individual decisions of other member states who may choose to vote against admission of the applicant state to GA or withhold their recognition of that state.

He has spoken of the need for reform of free movement rules in the EU, but the leaders of other member states, particularly Germany's Angela Merkel, have made it clear they will not budge on this point.

2) Alaska belongs to the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE), a reciprocal agreement between 15 western states to allow students to attend college in one of the other member states at a reduced out - of - state tuition level of 150 % of that school's in - state tuition.

According to the Court, this principle imposes a legal obligation upon EU Member States to act for the benefit of other Member States even when such actions are not in their own interest (para. 291 of the Judgment).

This arrangement allows the parties capable of working in the language of the case to press ahead with the written procedure while the court is preparing translations of the order for reference into the languages of the other member states.

In his Opinion, the AG further considers the fact that access to ISDS is not extended to investors of other Member States to be a «consequence inherent in the bilateral nature of BITs» and that ISDS is «not a benefit severable from the remainder of a BIT, but is an integral part thereof to such an extent that a BIT without an ISDS mechanism would be pointless since it would not achieve its aim, with is to encourage and attract foreign investment.»

If this directive no longer applies, then the Bars of other member states may refuse to recognise that UK - authorised firms can operate in those member states in this way.»

This was a particularly important case as it confirmed that it is very difficult to argue that registration of any judgment of a member state would be contrary to public policy in view of the concept of mutual trust in the legal systems of other member states, especially in cases where points could and should have been taken in the original jurisdiction.

• A judgment rendered by the court of a member State must be recognized and enforced by the courts of other member States unless one of the exceptions established by the Hague Convention applies.

The US Objectives propose that provisions governing intellectual property rights of the other member states be similar to those found in the U.S. law.

BINDING EFFECT OF DECISIONS BY COMPETITION AUTHORITIES The new law introduces a binding effect of decisions made by courts and competition authorities of other Member States and the European Commission, thereby removing the need to prove one of the elements of the breach — the infringement (fault).

The Berne Convention has a number of core features, including the principle of national treatment, which holds that each member state to the Convention would give citizens of other member states the same rights of copyright that it gave to its own citizens.

Th e rationale for the ECJ's ruling is that the courts of member states must trust the courts of other member states to apply jurisdictional rules correctly.

All of the other member states want some sort of increase.

From January 1st 1997, the UK harmonized its driver licensing entitlements with those of other member states in the EU, with the result that UK drivers passing their driving test from this date gain just a B entitlement (car) and can only drive a minibus if they are able to meet certain requirements, as follows.

First, the cooperation must be by its very nature limited; a limited cooperation agreement can not grant to the UK and Ireland rights «comparable to those of the other Member States» (§ 55).

In addition to several procedural issues, it raises the question how the Union will deal with certain treatment that is consequently granted to investors of third countries that may not similarly be available to nationals of other Member States.

It allows groups of Member States to pass European legislation despite the unwillingness (and even the vetoes) of other Member States.

One way to do this would be using appropriate sources of information like, for instance, legal databases which are pretty resourceful in terms of legislation and case - law of other Member States and other courts respectively.

The ECJ itself drastically narrowed the scope of the principle with the requirement that the matter must be equally clear to the courts of other Member States, taking into account the different language versions of EU legislation (there are now 24 official languages in the EU).

55D 7.6 Suspension of services Each Member State reserves the right to suspend the international telecommunication service, either generally or only for certain relations and / or for certain kinds of correspondence, outgoing, incoming or in transit, provided that it immediately notifies such action to each of the other Member States through the Secretary - General.

On the reference from the SAC, C - 399 / 09 Landtová, the CJEU ruled that while the special increment did not violate the Regulation as such, «the documents before the Court show [ed] incontrovertibly that the [CCC's] judgment discriminate [d], on the ground of nationality, between Czech nationals and the nationals of other Member States» (para. 43).

The courts of that other Member State may, where due to the specific circumstances of the case, this is in the best interests of the child, accept jurisdiction within six weeks of their seisure in accordance with paragraph 1 (a) or 1 (b).

(d) to foster the knowledge of the legal systems and law of the other Member States, notably by promoting relevant courses of comparative law;

It was not open to the UK to impose restrictions on workers who were nationals of other member states that were incompatible with the fundamental rules of community law.

Absent the derogation provisions in that paragraph, a worker who was a national of any member state had the same rights of access to the labour market and to the social advantages that go with it as those of any other member state.