The lawyers at Affleck & BarrisonLLP, have years of experience representing clients at bail hearings for criminal charges, bail hearings involving breach of recognizance or breach
of other court orders.
Not exact matches
According to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA), a firm has to procure a
court order before repossessing a vehicle belonging to a member
of the military, a law that was established to protect soldiers and
other military personnel from having to deal with legal issues while they're actively serving.
In some cases it has to remove content because
of a
court order, but in
other cases it will remove even relatively inoffensive images and posts — such as pictures
of women breast - feeding their children, for example — because it breaches the site's community standards, or because someone complains about the content.
The
court ordered an auction, but when no
other suitors presented themselves, Gaglardi's offer
of US$ 51 million cash for the team and the assumption
of debts worth about $ 100 million was accepted (ESPN reports the final tally as being higher, around US$ 265 million).
To the extent permitted by law, we may also disclose Personal Information, the Billing Information, and the
Other Information when required by law, court order, or other government or law enforcement authority or regulatory agency, or whenever we believe that disclosing such Information is necessary or advisable, for example, to protect the rights, property, or safety of Daily Harvest or o
Other Information when required by law,
court order, or
other government or law enforcement authority or regulatory agency, or whenever we believe that disclosing such Information is necessary or advisable, for example, to protect the rights, property, or safety of Daily Harvest or o
other government or law enforcement authority or regulatory agency, or whenever we believe that disclosing such Information is necessary or advisable, for example, to protect the rights, property, or safety
of Daily Harvest or
others
DAPA and the expanded provisions
of DACA never went into effect, because Texas and 25
other states successfully sued in Judge Hanen's
court, resulting in a February 2015
order blocking all
of what the Obama Administration had added in November 2014.
Mirror trades were a favored conduit in the first half
of this decade, regulators say, but they've been replaced by
other mechanisms for moving money, including illicit reinsurance contracts and fraudulent
court orders.
On the same day, the Ontario Superior
Court of Justice (Commercial List)(the «
Court») granted an
order (the «Initial Order»), which, among other things, provides for a stay of proceedings until February 13, 2015 (the «Stay Period&raq
order (the «Initial
Order»), which, among other things, provides for a stay of proceedings until February 13, 2015 (the «Stay Period&raq
Order»), which, among
other things, provides for a stay
of proceedings until February 13, 2015 (the «Stay Period»).
Under the NDA's terms, Trump had the clear right to «immediately obtain, either from the Arbitrator and / or from any
other court of competent jurisdiction, an ex parte issuance
of a restraining
order... without advance notice to [Daniels].»
The Toronto Real Estate Board (TREB) has filed an application with the Federal
Court of Appeal to stay the Competition Tribunal's June 3
order, which requires TREB to, in part, stop its «anti-competitive practices» and not exclude sold and
other disputed data from its virtual office website (VOW) feed.
It allows law enforcement officers to obtain a
court order when there is demonstrated evidence that a person poses a significant danger to himself or herself or
others, including significant danger as a result
of a mental health crisis or violent behavior.
We reserve the right to use or disclose your Personal Information if required by law or if we reasonably believe that use or disclosure is necessary to protect our rights, protect your safety or the safety
of others, investigate fraud, or comply with a law,
court order, or legal process.
We reserve the right to provide information to law enforcement personnel and
other third parties to answer inquiries; to respond to legal process; to respond to the
order of a
court of competent jurisdiction and those exercising the
court's authority; and, to protect us and our users.
As the Supreme
Court of Canada has confirmed, a law aimed at suppressing or reducing an «evil» or addressing a public concern relating to peace,
order, security, morality, health, or some
other similar purpose is a valid exercise
of the federal government's criminal law power.
Not long after the news
of a T - 12 halt, the SEC said it has obtained a
court order giving them access to freeze more than $ 27 million in trading proceeds from allegedly illegal distributions and sales
of restricted shares
of Longfin stock involving its CEO and three
other individuals.
A few simple sentences explaining why the
court in Dresden was Catholic while Saxony was Lutheran (because in 1697 the elector
of Saxony, Friedrich August, opportunistically converted to Catholicism in
order to be elected king
of Poland), the differences between Calvinist and Lutheran realms, why Leipzig was a commercial center, and
other such matters would have been helpful.
Without limiting the foregoing, under no circumstances shall the Company be held liable for any delay or failure in performance resulting directly or indirectly from acts
of nature, forces, or causes beyond its reasonable control, including, without limitation, Internet failures, computer equipment failures, telecommunication equipment failures,
other equipment failures, electrical power failures, strikes, labour disputes, riots, insurrections, civil disturbances, shortages
of labour or materials, fires, floods, storms, explosions, acts
of God, war, governmental actions,
orders of domestic or foreign
courts or tribunals, non-performance
of 3rd - parties, or loss
of or fluctuations in heat, light, or air conditioning.
Once the family broke the gag
order and got some national coverage there was huge outcry from first amendment lawyers about the illegality
of that
order, and also
others speaking out about having been legally gagged in
court cases with big power differential.
U.S. Supreme
Court justices, for example, have been called «the nine high priests,» and the sacredness imputed to the Constitution and
other artifacts
of the legal
order are often commented upon.102 No single church evokes the breadth
of respect enjoyed by the Supreme
Court.
I certainly hope for the Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani, as I would hope for myself and
others with me, if found out to be
of Christian faith and a modern
order, not unlike the Christians who walked with Jesus as a man and Pastor who, as it were, was finally offered up as a sacrificial offering to God upon a cross after being found guilty
of offending the then Church
of Israel who then proposed his death sentance to be carried out by a Roman
Court, though he was innocent
of the charges.
The United States and
other Western nations already allow terminating such individuals by withholding tube - supplied sustenance — as vividly exposed in the legal and cultural conflagration over the
court -
ordered dehydration death
of Terri Schiavo.
Archbishop
of Lyon, Philippe Barbarin, along with six
other priests, has been
ordered to appear in
court for allegedly not reporting paedophilia committed by another clergyman, Bernard Preynat.
If it were an accident, the first time it caused rashes and or nose bleeds and diarrhea, they would have written what caused it in my Medical Records to stop
others from causing the adverse reactions, but no, they have to try to prevent a Law Suit and write that I am delusional about the adverse reactions so every Doctor after that forced the adverse reactions on me and or refused to give me the Medical Treatment actually need, while they make money off charging the government for the Toxic Harmful Drugs that a Judge
ordered them not to give me, tut they just falsely called me delusional about the
Court Orders, to made money poisoning me with Toxic Drugs and Rash Creams, but normally they do that to their suspecting Victims to make money off doing Kidney transplants like they did to my Uncle, but they will not replace mine, because that is what they planned to do to kill me, just ask their associate assassin Dr Kanter
of the Minneapolis VA,
of course he will say I am delusional after he assaulted me saying the
other Hospital Labs were wrong about that Blood Test that show the harm they caused.
Lawyers for Kentucky's Department
of Insurance are encouraging a judge to hold Medi - Share, a cost - sharing ministry that helps pay medical bills for Christians who don't smoke or abuse alcohol (among
other qualifications), in contempt for continuing to operate in the state more than a year after a circuit
court judge
ordered the Florida - based group to stop until it meets Kentucky insurance regulations.
The
Court's own case law shows that in order to maintain the abortion right at the level of fundamental law, many other sectors of the states» legal order, at both statutory and common law, need to be altered: family law, marriage law, laws regulating the medical profession, and, as we now see with the recent circuit court decisions, criminal laws prohibiting private use of lethal f
Court's own case law shows that in
order to maintain the abortion right at the level
of fundamental law, many
other sectors
of the states» legal
order, at both statutory and common law, need to be altered: family law, marriage law, laws regulating the medical profession, and, as we now see with the recent circuit
court decisions, criminal laws prohibiting private use of lethal f
court decisions, criminal laws prohibiting private use
of lethal force.
Firstly, unlike
other martyrs we see that no trials were given to the Christian martyrs by the
court, as in the case
of Joseph Mukasa who was straight away
ordered to be killed.
Other than to the extent ordered by a bankruptcy or other court, the use and disclosure of all transferred user information will be subject to this Privacy Policy, or to a new privacy policy if you are given notice of that new privacy policy and you affirmatively opt - in to accep
Other than to the extent
ordered by a bankruptcy or
other court, the use and disclosure of all transferred user information will be subject to this Privacy Policy, or to a new privacy policy if you are given notice of that new privacy policy and you affirmatively opt - in to accep
other court, the use and disclosure
of all transferred user information will be subject to this Privacy Policy, or to a new privacy policy if you are given notice
of that new privacy policy and you affirmatively opt - in to accept it.
To the extent permitted by law, we will disclose your information to government authorities or third parties if: (a) required to do so by law, or in response to a subpoena or
court order; (b) we believe in our sole discretion that disclosure is reasonably necessary to protect against fraud, to protect the property or
other rights
of us or
other users, third parties or the public at large; or (c) we believe that you have abused the Sites or the Applications by using them to attack
other systems or to gain unauthorized access to any
other system, to engage in spamming or otherwise to violate applicable laws.
- Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing material that is obscene, racist, homophobic or sexist or that contains any form
of hate speech; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that infringe copyright; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are illegal, libellous, defamatory or may prejudice ongoing legal proceedings or breach a
court injunction or
other order; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are abusive, threatening or make any form
of personal attack on another user or an employee
of Packaging Europe magazine; - Post Messages in any language
other than English; - Post the same Message, or a very similar Message, repeatedly; - Post or otherwise publish any Messages unrelated to the Forum or the Forum's topic; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing any form
of advertising or promotion for goods and services or any chain Messages or «spam»; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages with recommendations to buy or refrain from buying a particular security or which contain confidential information
of another party or which otherwise have the purpose
of affecting the price or value
of any security; - Disguise the origin
of any Messages; - Impersonate any person or entity (including Packaging Europe magazine employees or Forum guests or hosts) or misrepresent any affiliation with any person or entity; - Post or transmit any Messages that contain software viruses, files or code designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality
of the Site or any computer software or equipment, or any
other harmful component; - Collect or store
other users» personal data; and / or - Restrict or inhibit any
other user from using the Forums.
Prior to
ordering split custody, the
court would inquire as to how one parent can financially assist the
other parent, such as making a consideration
of increasing child support payments.
They neglect to say that putting the county in charge
of the child's future comes with a
court order terminating their parental rights, a negative that can later come back to haunt the mother and affect her parental rights to
other children.
However, in 2006, the Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Association
of the Philippines, made up
of milk companies among
others, succeeded in appealing to the Supreme
Court for a temporary restraining
order on the Code's revised implementing rules and regulations.
I've seen
courts order divorced couples to co-parenting therapy or direct them to pay for a website that will allow a third party to monitor all
of their correspondence with each
other.
In this
Court's view Susan and Mary Lee need the shared strength they get from each
other in their familiar community among friends
of longstanding in
order to nurture and complete their development into good citizens during these next few years.
The
court shall
order sole parental responsibility with or without visitation to the
other parent when it is in the best interests
of the child.
provides for funding to be distributed by the Administrative Office
of the
Courts «for the specific purpose
of funding the parenting plan requirements pursuant to this part, through the divorcing parent education and mediation fund, which funding includes the costs
of court -
ordered mediation, parenting education programs and any related services to resolve family conflict in divorce, post-divorce, and
other child custody matters.»
This toolkit tells you how to ask for a custody, visitation, child support and medical support
order if (1) you and the
other parent are not married (or don't want a divorce), (2) you and the
other parent have signed an «Acknowledgment
of Paternity» and (3) there are no existing
court orders about your child.
If a parent fails to comply with the provisions
of a custody or visitation
order and the
other parent wants the
court to enforce those provisions, the parent must file a
court action against the
other parent.
Iowa law requires that the
court must consider the best interest
of the child and
order a custody arrangement that will give the child the chance for maximum continuing physical and emotional contact with both parents after the parents have separated and dissolved the marriage, and which will encourage parents to share the rights and responsibilities
of raising the child unless physical harm or significant emotional harm to the child,
other children, or a parent is likely to occur.
The
court awards custody in the following
order of preference unless in a particular case the best interest
of the child requires otherwise: to both parents jointly or to either parent; to a person or persons in whose home the child has been living and where the child has had a wholesome and stable environment; to any person related within the third degree
of consanguinity; to any
other person or persons whom the
court finds suitable and able to provide proper care.
An affidavit was filed a week ago by the A-G asking the Apex
Court to
order the defendant (Mr. Woyome) to appear before it on Thursday, November 10, at 9:00 am, «to be examined orally on oath by the 1st Defendant (Attorney - General) whether Mr. Woyome has any property or
other means
of satisfying the judgement debt».
An
order of perpetual injunction directed at the office od the 1st Defendant restraining it from acting or purporting to act on behalf
of Honourable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta in respect
of the said petition before the 2nd Defendant; and Any further or
other orders as this honourable
court would deem feet in the circumstances.
Many
of the current arch-proponents
of «Government must obey all
court orders on bail» do not seem to care to mention this
other side
of the coin to balance the argument.
The FBI obtained a secret
court order last summer to monitor the communications
of an adviser to presidential candidate Donald Trump, part
of an investigation into possible links between Russia and the campaign, law enforcement and
other U.S. officials said.
One would have limited the time an agency can delay a
court -
ordered release
of information while drafting an appeal to two months; the
other would have let judges award attorney fees to individuals who win cases against agencies that deny them information.
After issuing the interim
orders, the
court also issued 14 days to Sterling Bank and any
other interested party to appear and prove the legitimacy
of the monies, failing which the funds would be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.
«Further attestation to the existence
of the two forces
of opposite direction under the Buhari's dictatorial presidency is the recent launch
of online signature project spearheaded by a risen constitutional lawyer and Georgetown University law scholar, Ms Carol Ajie; for the purpose
of compelling President Buhari to obey
court orders and
other judicial consequential pronouncements or resign or be impeached.
South - East Based Coalition
of Human Rights Organisations, SBCHROs, has called on the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, the umbrella body
of lawyers in Nigeria and
other rights groups in the country, to direct their members to boycott
courts in Nigeria in protest over President Muhammadu Buhari's disobedience to
orders of courts in the country.
Other examples would include Moos and McClure (where the
Court of Appeal overturned the only successful kettling case to date) and the admittedly contentious decision in Abdul v DPP - the conviction under section five
of the Public
Order Act 1986
of those protesting in fairly vituperative terms («baby killers», «rapists», «murderers» etc) about the war in Iraq at a homecoming for British troops.
U.S. District
Court Judge Leonard Wexler, at their arraignment,
ordered Spota and McPartland not to have contact with each
other without their lawyers present in matters
of the indictment, and not to contact any witnesses.