Sentences with phrase «of other covered entities»

(2) A covered entity participating in an organized health care arrangement that performs a function or activity as described by paragraph (1)(i) of this definition for or on behalf of such organized health care arrangement, or that provides a service as described in paragraph (1)(ii) of this definition to or for such organized health care arrangement, does not, simply through the performance of such function or activity or the provision of such service, Start Printed Page 82799become a business associate of other covered entities participating in such organized health care arrangement.

If a health care clearinghouse creates or receives protected health information only as a business associate of other covered entities, it is not required to produce a notice.

Not exact matches

The cybersecurity event impacts the covered entity and notice of it is required to be provided to any government body, self - regulatory agency or any other supervisory body

Protection of client funds with other Saxo Bank Group entities is covered by local regulations.

According to Michelangelo Signorile, political donors and other entities are courting LGBT people in order to cover up criticism of unethical and questionable actions.

So it's not imposing anything more than what is imposed on any other entity that is covered by the Smoke - Free Air Act,» siad City Councilman Vincent Gentile of Brooklyn.

-- For a covered entity described in section 700 (13)(C), 1 emission allowance for each ton of carbon dioxide equivalent of fossil fuel - based carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, or any other fluorinated gas that is a greenhouse gas (except for nitrogen trifluoride), or any combination thereof, produced or imported by such covered entity during the previous calendar year for sale or distribution in interstate commerce.

-- The term «designated representative» means, with respect to a covered entity, a reporting entity (as defined in section 713), an offset project developer, or any other entity receiving or holding allowances, offset credits, or term offset credits under this title, an individual authorized, through a certificate of representation submitted to the Administrator by the owners and operators or similar entity official, to represent the owners and operators or similar entity official in all matters pertaining to this title (including the holding, transfer, or disposition of allowances or offset credits), and to make all submissions to the Administrator under this title.

-- For a covered entity described in section 700 (13)(J), 1 emission allowance for each ton of carbon dioxide equivalent of greenhouse gas that would be emitted from the combustion of the natural gas, and any other gas meeting the specifications for commingling with natural gas for purposes of delivery, that such entity delivered during the previous calendar year to customers that are not covered entities, assuming no capture and sequestration of that greenhouse gas.

A covered employer or other entity treats an applicant or employee less favorably because he or she has a history of a disability or because he or she is perceived to have a physical or mental impairment that is not transitory and minor (even if he or she does not have such an impairment); or

-- An employer, public accommodation, or other entity covered under this Act shall not be excused from compliance with the requirements of this Act because of any failure to receive technical assistance under this section, including any failure in the development or dissemination of any technical assistance manual authorized by this section.

(2) participating in a contractual or other arrangement or relationship that has the effect of subjecting a covered entity's qualified applicant or employee with a disability to the discrimination prohibited by this title (such relationship includes a relationship with an employment or referral agency, labor union, an organization providing fringe benefits to an employee of the covered entity, or an organization providing training and apprenticeship programs);

(6) using qualification standards, employment tests or other selection criteria that screen out or tend to screen out an individual with a disability or a class of individuals with disabilities unless the standard, test or other selection criteria, as used by the covered entity, is shown to be job - related for the position in question and is consistent with business necessity; and

Finally, the terms «employer» and «employer or other covered entity» are used interchangeably throughout this Appendix to refer to all covered entities subject to the employment provisions of the ADA.

Filed Under: Daily Investing Tip Tagged With: call options, covered call options, Investing Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, or other advertiser and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

Filed Under: Career Tagged With: career, Cover Letter, Professional Resume, Resume Template, Resumes Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, or other advertiser and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

Filed Under: Millionaire Investor Profile Tagged With: Covered Call, Investing in the stock market, Laurie Itkin, Millionaire, Options, options trading, Stock Market, The Options Lady Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, or other advertiser and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

In the event an insurer receives from a covered person a valid order of protection against the policyholder or other person covered under the policy then the insurer is prohibited, for the duration of the order, from disclosing to the policyholder or other person the address (including street, mailing or email addresses) and telephone number of the insured, or of any person or entity providing covered services to the insured.

Requires the EPA Administrator to change the definition of «covered entity» and compliance obligations with respect to non-HFC fluorinated gases and establish other requirements if the EPA Administrator determines that such emissions can best be regulated by designating downstream emission sources as covered entities.

Defines «reporting entity» to mean: (1) a covered entity; (2) an entity that would be covered if it had emitted, produced, imported, manufactured, or delivered in 2008 or any subsequent year more than the applicable threshold level of carbon dioxide; (3) other entities that EPA determines will help achieve overall goals of reducing global warming pollution; (4) any vehicle fleet with emissions of more than 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent on an annual basis, if its inclusion will help achieve such reduction; (5) any entity that delivers electricity to a facility in an energy - intensive industrial sector that meets the energy or GHG intensity criteria.

If the Administrator determines, based on consideration of environmental effectiveness, cost effectiveness, administrative feasibility, extent of coverage of emissions, competitiveness and other relevant considerations consistent with the purposes of this title, that emissions of non-HFC fluorinated gases can best be regulated by designating downstream emission sources as covered entities with compliance obligations under section 722, the Administrator shall, after notice and comment rulemaking, change the definition of covered entity and the compliance obligations under section 722 with respect to non-HFC fluorinated gases accordingly, consistent with the purposes of this title, and establish such other requirements as are necessary to ensure compliance for such entities with the requirements of this title.

-- Except as otherwise specified in this Act, nothing in this Act relating to allowances, offset credits, or term offset credits established or issued under this title shall affect the application of any other provision of law to a covered entity, or the responsibility for a covered entity to comply with any such provision of law.

«(C) for a natural gas local distribution company described in paragraph (13)(J), greenhouse gases that would be emitted from the combustion of the natural gas, and any other gas meeting the specifications for commingling with natural gas for purposes of delivery, that such entity delivered during that calendar year to customers that are not covered entities, assuming no capture and sequestration of that greenhouse gas.

A covered entity's allowable emissions level for each calendar year is the number of emission allowances (or offset credits or other allowances as provided in subsection (d)-RRB- it holds as of 12:01 a.m. on April 1 (or a later date established by the Administrator under subsection (j)-RRB- of the following calendar year.

-- The term «designated representative» means, with respect to a covered entity, a reporting entity (as defined in section 713), an offset project developer, or any other entity receiving or holding allowances, offset credits, or term offset credits under this title, an individual authorized, through a certificate of representation submitted to the Administrator by the owners and operators or similar entity official, to represent the owners and operators or similar entity official in all matters pertaining to this title (including the holding, transfer, or disposition of allowances or offset credits), and to make all submissions to the Administrator under this title.

[3] The Greenhouse House Gas Protocol categorizes direct and indirect emissions into three broad scopes: Scope 1: All direct GHG emissions; Scope 2: Indirect GHG emissions from consumption of purchased electricity, heat or steam; and Scope 3: Other indirect emissions, such as the extraction and production of purchased materials and fuels, transport - related activities in vehicles not owned or controlled by the reporting entity, electricity - related activities (e.g. T&D losses) not covered in Scope 2, outsourced activities, waste disposal, etc..

«Covered Person: (A) an entity that disseminates information by print, broadcast, cable, satellite, mechanical, photographic, electronic, or other means and that (i) publishes a newspaper, book, magazine, or other periodical; (ii) operates a radio or television broadcast station (or network of such stations), cable system, or satellite carrier, or a channel or programming service for any such station, network, system, or carrier; or (iii)-- operates a news agency or wire service; (B) a parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of such an entity; or (C) and employee, contractor, or other person who gathers, edits, photographs, records, prepares, or disseminates news or information for such an entity.»

For example, the Paris Bar Council recently issued guidance instructing French counsel to inform interview witnesses before any interview that (1) the external counsel represents the legal entity, not the witness or any other individual and (2) the discussion is covered by the «client — attorney privilege», which belongs exclusively to the legal entity, as opposed to the individual, and means that the entity can choose to share the substance of the interview with third parties, including regulators or prosecutors.

The Secretary will conduct a compliance review of the covered entity or business associate to determine if there is compliance with the applicable administrative simplification provisions when a preliminary review of the facts indicates a possible violation due to willful neglect.5 The Secretary also retains discretion to conduct a compliance review in any other circumstance.6

Did the search include beneficiaries of the cover (e.g. directors), the (re) insured's agents, and other entities in its organisation?

The law requires an employer or other covered entity to reasonably accommodate an employee's religious beliefs or practices, unless doing so would cause more than a minimal burden on the operations of the employer's business.

Under the Privacy Rule, a covered entity may «share [PHI] with an individual's family member, other relative, close personal friend, or any other person identified by the individual, [which is] directly relevant to the involvement of that person in the patient's care or payment for health care.»

In response to stakeholder concern that the current requirements for sharing patient records covered by Part 2 deter patients from participating in HIEs, ACOs, and other similar organizations, SAMHSA proposes that the «to whom» section of the consent disclosure form could include a more generalized description of entities that would be permitted to receive patient information.

If the OCR's investigation indicates there might be facts to support the possibility of a violation due to willful neglect, the OCR must conduct a compliance review of the covered entity or business associate to determine if there is compliance with the applicable administrative provisions.6 The OCR also retains discretion to conduct a compliance review in any other circumstance.7

For example, the Paris Bar Council has issued guidance instructing French counsel to inform interview witnesses before any interview that (1) the external counsel represents the legal entity, not the witness or any other individual and (2) the discussion is covered by the «client — attorney privilege», which belongs exclusively to the legal entity, as opposed to the individual, and means that the entity can choose to share the substance of the interview with third parties, including regulators or prosecutors.

The regulation does not specify the form that the program must take, but requires that it be «designed to perform the following core cybersecurity functions:» (1) identify internal and external cyber risks by, at a minimum, identifying the Nonpublic Information stored on the Covered Entity's Information Systems, the sensitivity of such Nonpublic Information, and how and by whom such Nonpublic Information may be accessed; (2) use defensive infrastructure and the implementation of policies and procedures to protect the company's Information Systems and the Nonpublic Information stored on those Information Systems, from unauthorized access, use or other malicious acts; (3) detect Cybersecurity Events - which are defined broadly to include «any act or attempt, successful or unsuccessful, to gain unauthorized access to, disrupt or misuse an Information System or information stored on an Information System;» (4) respond to identified or detected Cybersecurity Events to mitigate any negative effects; (5) recover from Cybersecurity Events and restore normal operations and services; and (6) fulfill all regulatory reporting obligations.

Since the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) was implemented in 2003, the Office of Civil Rights (OCR) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has not conducted a formalized plan for auditing health care providers, insurance plans and other covered entities... until now.

Instead, a covered entity must apply privacy protections to the protected health information about former inmates in the same manner and to the same extent that it protects the protected health information of other individuals.

Under the final rule, we specify that covered entities may disclose to a person involved in the current health care of the individual (such as a family member, other relative, close personal friend, or any other person identified by the individual) protected health information directly related to the person's involvement in the current health care of an individual or payment related to the individual's health care.

The preamble explained that covered entities could not have general policies of approving all requests (or all requests of a particular type) without carefully considering certain criteria (see «Criteria,» below) as well as other information specific to the request.

One way a covered entity may demonstrate that it has met the standard is if a person with appropriate knowledge and experience applying generally accepted statistical and scientific principles and methods for rendering information not individually identifiable makes a determination that the risk is very small that the information could be used, either by itself or in combination with other available information, by anticipated recipients to identify a subject of the information.

To clarify the interaction between these provisions, in the final rule we have specifically added language to the paragraph addressing disclosures for law enforcement that permits covered entities to comply with legal mandates, and have included a specific cross reference in the provision of the final rule that permits covered entities to make other disclosures required by law.

(i) On behalf of such covered entity or of an organized health care arrangement (as defined in § 164.501 of this subchapter) in which the covered entity participates, but other than in the capacity of a member of the workforce of such covered entity or arrangement, performs, or assists in the performance of:

Rather than creating a single definition of «research information,» we allow covered entities the flexibility to define that subset of protected health information they create during clinical research that is not necessary for treatment, payment, or health care operations and that the covered entity will use or disclose under more limited circumstances than it uses or discloses other protected health information.

Other commenters asked whether researchers or non-governmental entities that collect and analyze patient data to monitor and evaluate quality of care are covered entities.

The circumstances under which members of a covered entity's workforce can bind the covered entity are a function of other law, not of this regulation.

Under the final rule, covered entities may obtain authorization to disclose protected health information to private entities seeking to establish registries or other databases; they may disclose protected health information as required by law; or they may disclose protected health information to such entities if they meet the conditions of one of the provisions of § § 164.510 or 164.512.

We expressed the hope that covered entities, their business partners, and others would make greater use of de-identified health information than they do today, when it is sufficient for the purpose, and that such practice would reduce the burden and the confidentiality concerns that result from the use of individually identifiable health information for some of these purposes.

Under this approach, only the component of an employer or other plan sponsor would be treated as a covered entity.

Comment: A number of commenters urged the Department to expand or clarify the definition of «covered entity» to include certain entities other than health care clearinghouses, health plans, and health care providers who conduct standard transactions.