Carbon dioxide equivalent includes the climate change effects of the emissions
of other green house gases like methane.
And to add to that, there are plenty
of other green house gases that display properties similar to Co2 in much larger quantities which are more effected by natural events then man made events.
Not exact matches
The same people who protest international support for third - world countries saying «we need to take care
of our own first» are ironically the same people who actually want to abolish food stamps, the WIC program, free school lunches, welfare and social security in the US, never mind the fact that the people who benefit from these programs are the ones who cut their lawns, clean their homes, serve their meals in restaurants, and build their
houses, all while going home to a tiny apartment they share with 6
other people and finding nothing to eat in the
house but a can
of green beans because payday is still 2 days off and there's only enough
gas in the car to get them to work the next two days, so driving around town for 2 hours trying to find an open food bank isn't an option.
Co2 is.04 %
of all
green house gas and increased levels are the result
of the sun heating up, as evidence points to the
other planets and moons heating up at the same rate.
Which
gas is being used instead
of chloro floro carbon or
other green house gases in refrigerator and air conditioners?
There is no reason to limit human production
of CO2, CH4, and
other minor
green house gases as has been proposed.
QUestion: Since we can calculate within a factor
of 50 % or so the stable temperature
of the earth just by looking at the concentration
of green house gases on the earth and no
other factors it does not make any sense to me to talk
of feedbacks as having any impact
other than transiently.
To you and
others like you — it may seem intuitive that when you sit a large stone saucer
of water out in the sun, magic forces make part
of it get colder due to
green house gas effect chaos.
There is the real situation that the «
green (
house) minority» has diminishing Public interest due its incessant platforming
of non-SCIENCE and the attachment
of equally vapid demands for «Wind Power» to replace
Gas and Coal (which in REALITY is only creating the growing need and thus INTEREST in Uranium Fuelled power generation for wide spread use) and
other platforming from «alternate lobby interests».
This should include (but doesn't) the manufacture and use
of pesticides and fertilizers, fuel and oil for tractors, equipment, trucking and shipping, electricity for lighting, cooling, and heating, and emissions
of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and
other green house gases.
However, the number is probably closer to 25 - 30 % as they failed to include the «manufacture and use
of pesticides and fertilizers, fuel and oil for tractors, equipment, trucking and shipping, electricity for lighting, cooling, and heating, and emissions
of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and
other green house gases» and «still doesn't include a large portion
of the fuel, the synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, some
of the nitrous oxide, all
of the CFCs and bromines, and most
of the transport» and methane emissions.