It is well known that there have been some glitches in the peer review: a paper by Soon and Baliunas (2003) caused the resignation of several editors from the journal Climate Research (Kinne 2003), and Wagner (Wagner et al. 2011) resigned from the editorship of Remote Sensing over the publication
of a paper by Spencer and Braswell (2010).
Which makes * any * criticism
of any paper by your definition «due to pre-existing opinions».
«A write - up
of my paper by Dr Roy Spencer indicated that I over-stated the increase in insolation due to a reduction in cloud cover I didn't take certain factors into account.»
But my report
of the paper by Polyakov et al. is correct.
The most important claim in support
of the paper by Anastassia has in my view been that the equation is based on independent physics.
Industrial Hemp: Global Operations, Local Implications Abstract
of a paper by Valerie L. Vantreese, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
With that being said, if you can think of each day as a piece
of paper by itself it doesn't add up to much but when you stack 365 pages together it adds up to way more than you ever thought.
Part Four — discussion and results
of a paper by Dessler et al using the latest AIRS and CERES data to calculate current atmospheric and water vapor feedback vs height and surface temperature
What I find fascinating is that, after outright rejection
of the paper by reviewers, we had to go back to the very basics in order to convince reviewers of what we were saying, and take them through the whole issue of forcing - versus - feedback one step at a time.
Well there was one exception: Sherwood Rowland, Nobel laureate submitted a letter which was an indirect critique
of a paper by Arthur Robinson and others (which I did not publish but to which I provided a link) «Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide,» which argued, as I recall, that rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration was an unmitigated benefit to humanity.
(7) Halpern et al. do not recognize the fundamental errors
of the paper by Bakan and Raschke.
Now in light
of the paper by Dr Curtin that i brought to Dr. Loehles attention the other day, about mankind releasing upwards of 300Gtons of water vapour annualy into the atmosphere, then just maybe we have to start to look at water vapour as a anthropogenic GG now.
Agricultural Economics @ Univ. of Kentucky - Industrial Hemp: Global Markets and Prices (Abstract) «Industrial Hemp: Global Markets and Prices» Abstract
of another paper by Valerie L. Vantreese, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
I haven't seen much discussion
of this paper by Charles R Frank Jr from the Brookings Institution.
These are the somewhat surprising conclusions
of a paper by Susan Solomon of America's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and her colleagues, which was published online by Science on January 28th.
As the mails show, Jones was critical
of a paper by Ross Mckittrick and Pat Michaels.
I'll be interested to see any analysis
of the paper by Matthew Nisbet of American University, who charted the flow from environmental groups.
Pick any one of her papers and then follow the citations
of that paper by others by date.
You might learn something from the appendix
of this paper by Waple et al describing how to estimate sensitivity from forcings and their estimated responses.
When I started writing this comment I was thinking that a further study was needed to validate what seemed like overly general conclusions
of the paper by Akbari and Rosenfeld at http://www.energy.ca.gov/2008publications/CEC-999-2008-031/CEC-999-2008-031.PDF.
But Pimm also sent me a strong criticism
of the paper by e-mail, calling it a «sham.»
I remind
you of the paper by Kukla et al and the special issue of Quaternary Research in 1972, concluding that based on the comparison with the other interglacials we will enter soon in glaciation (see the introduction of our papers to have a summary of that story).
My attention was drawn in August to a draft version
of a paper by Phil Klotzbach and colleagues that discussed the differences between global temperature products.
The ACS» science journal Langmuir has published a paper describing a breakthrough in sonochemical coating
of paper by microbiocidal silver nanoparticles.
Walt, I think many of us have seen it, and in particular the abuse
of that paper by the usual suspects.
To the journals credit, they published a criticism
of the paper by Benestad (2004) to this effect.
A ridiculous petition has been initiated aimed at forcing the retraction
of a paper by Stanford University scientists on the relative nutritional merits of organic and conventional foods.
But there has also been an «appraisal»
of the paper by Nic Lewis that has appeared in no fewer than three other climate blogs (you can guess which).
Readers may recall discussions
of a paper by Thompson et al (2008) back in May 2008.
This work received an important update in the journal Science, with the publication
of a paper by J. Oerlemans, of Utrecht University.
To make these drawings, Serra pours melted paintstick onto a table, puts a layer of wire mesh or screen on top, and then transfers the pigment on to a sheet
of paper by pressing a hard marking tool onto the back of the paper.
Featuring tapestries of Betty Vera, landscapes from the mind of Lorna Ritz, tree landscapes by Michael Filmus, still lifes of Stephanie Anderson, «Mylar ladies»» of Kathleen Cammarata and photographs
of paper by Paul Solovay.
David Ratcliff tests the resilience
of paper by using media like spray paint and acrylic, resulting in surprising hand - hewn imagery that tests the senses.
A television playing video in the hallway between the two rooms shows footage of the process — helpful for anyone having trouble visualizing how to make four - foot - long sheets
of paper by hand.
This monotype, which is a type of printmaking where ink or paint is directly applied to a flat surface, which is then rolled through a press to transfer the image to a sheet
of paper by way of pressure, is a unique, one of kind print.
By repeating her gestures in linear space and time, she knows the properties
of paper by heart, but also knows how to introduce surprise through new corporal displays.
Sometimes he saturates the paper in a monochrome and then folds it, paradoxically emphasizing the flatness
of the paper by turning it into a sculptural shape.
The works include rarely seen Ming and Qing Dynasty porcelains from the Frick Collection, first millennium stone sculpture from the Arthur M. Sackler Collection at Columbia University, and contemporary ink
of paper by contemporary Beijing artist Liu Dan.
Fiona Banner's black pennants hang above the main hall, and black borders convert a stack
of paper by Félix González - Torres into the anonymity of death.
Noriko Ambe, Dario Escobar, Maximo Gonzalez, Peter Halley, Thomas Hirschhorn, Marco Maggi, Manfred Peckl, Stefan Saffer, Mathias Schmied, Ken Solomon, Yuken Teruya, The Three, Rachel Urkowitz Cristinerose Josée Bienvenu Gallery is pleased to present Newpapers an exhibition of works on and
of paper by thirteen international artists including: Noriko Ambe, Dario Escobar, Maximo Gonzalez, Peter Halley, Thomas Hirschhorn, Marco Maggi, Manfred Peckl, Ken Solomon, Stefan Saffer, Mathias Schmied, Yuken Teruya, The Three, and Rachel Urkowitz.
The imminent replacement
of paper by more efficient and environment - friendly supports was announced in the early Nineties.
Paper Cuts now open at Riverdale Gallery Features dimensional works
of paper by Amy Genser, Don Morris and Heidi Whitman.
As each dog runs, the judge indicates, though the use of hand signals, any faults which are noted on a sheet
of paper by a ring steward known as a «scribe.»
Senior examiners judge the difficulty
of each paper by looking at samples of candidates» work from the current year and previous years, as well as statistical data about candidates» performance.
My critique
of the paper by Jackson, Johnson, and Persico is very simple and might be lost in the dazzling misdirection of their response.
Marx and Engels pour over piles
of paper by candlelight, scratching out words and scribbling in phrases that will become legendary, while discussing strategy with their respective wives, Jenny (Vicky Krieps) and Mary (Hannah Steele).
While in New York, he acted in various plays, and received a Lucille Lortel Nomination for his work in ANIMAL OUT
OF PAPER by Rajiv Joseph at the Second Stage Theatre.
According to a derivative summary
of the paper by Michael M. Patterson, PhD, the international associate editor of the JAOA, Standley's work shows that «fibroblasts respond differently to various strain patterns, secreting various anti-inflammatory chemicals and growth factors, with implications for wound healing and muscle repair, among other physiologic processes.»
Since the publication
of the paper by Karl and colleagues, additional groups have examined the data.
In other words, it's a way to lie about the quality
of the paper by claiming there are weaknesses the authors were unaware of even when the weaknesses are clearly stated in the paper itself.