Sentences with phrase «of per pupil expenditure»

In other words, if little Janey were to transfer out of Amistad and into Wexler one quarter of the way through the school year, then Amistad should have to forfeit not only what remains of the per pupil expenditure for Johnny that it would have been entitled to, but it should also reimburse to the district that which was collected in Janey's name for the first quarter of the school year too, when the school was apparently not adequately meeting the needs of Janey.

A clear majority of respondents favor higher levels of per pupil expenditure and higher teacher salaries.

Kentucky is missing the most recent year of per pupil expenditures and fails to provide a table or graph that would allow citizens to easily compare changes in per pupil expenditures over time.

Another explanation considers the related issue of per pupil expenditures.

Now, over 22 percent of per pupil expenditures goes toward benefits payments.

The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education provides more than ten years of Per Pupil Expenditures Reports, which contain operating per pupil expenditure data.

Massachusetts provides more than ten years of Per Pupil Expenditures Reports, which contain total expenditure data, total salary data, and pension data.

Not exact matches

About a 30 % increase in average expenditure per pupil (over four years, between age seven and 11) is expected to produce an increase in achievement of a level equivalent to 25 - 30 points on the PISA scale.

In the past decade, monitoring the provision of quality education primarily meant tracking inputs into schools such as per pupil educational expenditures, number fo trained teachers, class sizes and teacher - pupil ratio, instructional time andaccess to ICT.

It estimates that expenditures average $ 6,680 per pupil, hardly more than 50 percent of the average actual expenditure level of $ 12,637 per pupil in the districts where respondents live.

If you attend Incline High School in the upscale town of Incline Village, for instance, you in effect «receive» more than $ 13,248 in public funds — that is, the per - pupil expenditure in that community, which is far above the state average of $ 8,274 per pupil.

Corrections for adjusted per - pupil expenditures place the national value at $ 11,841, with revised levels higher than initially reported for all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

For the analyses of per - pupil expenditures, we matched survey respondents to school districts using either census blocks or zip codes.

For the indicator capturing the percent of students in districts where per - pupil expenditures reach or exceed the U.S. average, the corrected national value is 39.8 percent, with revised values lower than previously reported for 36 states.

In percentage terms, estimates of teacher salaries better approximated reality than did estimates of per - pupil expenditures.

When studying the pattern of charter school enrollment across the country, we took into account how each of three factors contributes to or retards charter school growth: per pupil expenditures (also measured during the 1989 — 90 school year), length of time a charter law was on the books, and degree of permissiveness of each state's charter school law, as measured by the CER index.

Spending: Connecticut spends well above the national average of $ 7,734 per pupil, ranking sixth among the 50 states and the District of Columbia, with an expenditure of $ 9,188 in the 2001 - 02 school year.

In other words, these schools typically received 1 to 4 percent more than the district average, or $ 15,000 to $ 60,000 per school of 500 students in a district where the average school expenditure is $ 3,000 per pupil.

We make this comparison by calculating the ratio of each school's per - pupil noncategorical expenditure to the district's average per - pupil noncategorical expenditure.

This program may yet lift the performance of our pupils as they go through the school system, although problems remain: out of Australia's total expenditure on early childhood education in 2010, parents contributed almost half the cost and only 56 per cent was met from the public purse — compared with an OECD average of 82 per cent public funding — and the rest was from private sources, probably parental pockets.

In comparison to total per pupil current expenditures of about $ 11,600, employer pension costs represent a significant drain on resources that might otherwise have been available for classroom expenditures.

A natural measure of the rise in costs is the rise in real per pupil expenditures for employer pension contributions.

For the nation as a whole, overall support for higher spending levels dropped by 8 percentage points (from 46 to 38 percent) when respondents were informed of actual per - pupil expenditures in their own district.

In addition, we control for district - level characteristics, including total enrollment, per - pupil expenditures, and percentage of funding that comes from local, state, and federal sources.

We use the Common Core of Data to identify teachers in urban areas, the grade level of each teacher's school, and the per - pupil expenditure on instruction by each teacher's district.

(Note that the National Center for Education Statistics» calculation of total per pupil expenditures excludes unfunded pension liabilities.

The state's education troubles were hardly limited to urban districts like Providence, Central Falls, Newport, and West Warwick, all of which had per - pupil expenditures well above the state average.

[Update: An earlier version of this post omitted Virginia from the list of states adopting STC programs since 2010 and incorrectly labeled total per pupil expenditures as operating per pupil expenditures.]

Told the truth about per - pupil expenditures, the share of African Americans willing to support additional spending plummeted from 82 to 48 percent.

When people are asked to estimate per pupil spending in their local school districts, the average response in 2016 is $ 7,020, a little more than 50 percent of the actual per pupil expenditure of $ 12,440.

When we asked respondents to estimate per pupil spending in their local school district, the average response in 2016 was $ 7,020, little more than 50 % of the actual per pupil expenditure of $ 12,440, on average, in the districts in which respondents lived.

Once family background and the nature of the peer group at school were taken into account, student achievement was unaffected by per - pupil expenditure, school size, the science lab facilities, the number of books in the library, the use of tracking by ability levels to assign students to classrooms, or other factors previously assumed to be indicators of what makes for a good school.

Before Coleman, a good school was defined by its «inputs» — per - pupil expenditure, school size, comprehensiveness of the curriculum, volumes per student in the library, science lab facilities, use of tracking, and similar indicators of the resources allocated for the students» education.

It came about, in California, in part because we have one of the lowest per - pupil expenditures for public education in the country.

As a result, total per - pupil expenditures on education reached a near all - time high in the recession school year of 2009 — 10, climbing (in constant dollars) to $ 13,154 from a $ 12,520 level in 2005 — 06.

And we estimate the impact on per - pupil expenditure of the proportion of students in a district with Individualized Education Plans (IEPs), as students with IEPs generally have special needs that result in higher spending.

The basic building blocks for calculating the cost per pupil of the various policies Picus and Odden propose are the approximate average expenditure of $ 7,800 per pupil and average teacher compensation (salary plus benefits) of $ 60,000 for the state of Washington.

Had the government paid for the voucher, the expenditure could have taken the form of a simple transfer from the public sector to the private sector, which in the long run need not add to the per - pupil cost of education.

Nor can they be attributed to demographic change, the introduction of preschool education or class - size reduction, or greater per pupil expenditure.

Myers selected the top 75 districts and estimated their average level of per - pupil expenditures for regular education students.

Although both the number of school employees and expenditures per pupil have risen steadily for many decades, that trend has come to an end.

Perhaps the best evidence comes from a recent study in Minnesota, which estimated that increasing the number of instructional days from 175 to 200 would cost close to $ 1,000 per student, in a state where the median per - pupil expenditure is about $ 9,000.

This per - pupil figure does not fully recognize all inherent expenditures (for instance, the costs of school leadership, school facilities, and district - provided shared services).

In 1999, Jay Chambers of the American Institutes for Research merged unique state - level databases containing information on teacher salaries, teacher course assignments, and course enrollment data to calculate per - pupil expenditures by course for students in Ohio.

At that time, the country did not realize it was about to enter a deep recession followed by a prolonged, uneven recovery, and 50 % of the public was ready to spend more on schools even after being told current levels of per - pupil expenditure in the local school district.

The estimated difference, possibly between $ 2,000 and $ 3,000 per pupil, was less than one might expect given the expansion of instructional time, enrichment programs, and staff, but the operators» expertise seems to be an important intangible benefit that comparisons of line - item expenditures do not capture.

In «Beating the Odds,» [a CGCS report that provides a city - by - city analysis of student performance and gaps in achievement] one of the findings is that the average per - pupil expenditure in the nation's largest urban school systems is now below the national average.

Reporting per - pupil expenditures at the school level will undoubtedly uncover some inequitable distribution of resources within states and districts across the country.

In the end, she suggests that the best way to restore the comparability guidelines of Title I to their original intent is by requiring school districts to equalize per - pupil dollar expenditures before accepting federal funds.

[34] An ESA that provided families [35] with somewhere between 75 percent to 90 percent of the state average M&O expenditure per pupil would have been worth between $ 6,767 and $ 8,120 in 2014 — 2015.