Perhaps this search began in the mid-1980s, with Johns's cycle The Seasons (1985 — 86), in which picturing this venture of thought required a detour through picturing something like a self — hard to commit to it being Johns's self — through references to some of the artist's earlier image strategies (flags, devices) as well as icons
of philosophical thinking such as the Platonic forms, Joseph Jastrow's duck - rabbit diagram (the latter made famous by Ludwig Wittgenstein's inquiry into «seeing as» in the Philosophical Investigations, 1953) and Pliny's origin story of the birth of painting as the tracing of a loved - one's silhouette in shadow.
Hence, the arguments for the existence of a personal God developed in two recent books by Personalist philosophers will be used as illustrating the kind
of philosophical thinking that can support DeWolf's position.
Nevertheless, most of what Whitehead tells us about God in Religion in the Making is primarily based on the further development
of his philosophical thought.
It is to be hoped that as the centre develops in its work, so it will broaden its outlook so that the natural sciences, the single most influential strand
of philosophical thought in modern times, is not left out of the conversation.
The development
of philosophical thought was effected under the influence of dogmatic and theological considerations — this much we can learn in spite of the darkness shrouding its history.
Greg Easterbrook's brief, masterful tribute to Charles Hartshorne in U.S. News and World Report (23 February 1998) similarly credits Hartshorne's ability to achieve his great philosophical work while standing outside the mainstream
of philosophical thought, and swimming against the tide of intellectual fashion.
We have also seen that the traditional Christian interpretations of love have been largely influenced by one kind
of philosophical thought about being.
Then is discussed several models of God which have been employed, particularly two which have recently been developed under the influence
of philosophical thought: the agent model and the process model.
The two schools
of philosophical thought represented on this occasion were Epicureanism and Stoicism: the former, discounting reason and advancing pleasure through experience, or self - satisfaction at the highest and noblest human level, as the true impetus for living; and the latter, exalting human indifference, or submission to the exigencies of existence through rigid self - discipline, treating with sublime disregard good fortune and bad fortune alike.
The «brain in a vat» has long been a staple
of philosophical thought experiments and science fiction.
Intermittently bright and gloomy, his paintings are characterized by unconventional grade of the constant concentration of pure pictorial elements, as color, surface, proportion, and scale followed by the theories that they could reveal the presence
of the philosophical thoughts.
Many of the works, such as Clock with Left Missing (2015), exist in the world
of a philosophical thought experiment as Cranston attempts to convey how a subject with brain damage would illustrate a clock.
Not exact matches
And I also
think that it goes to the
philosophical core
of the company: We are a community
of artists.
But I
think it's actually one
of the most interesting
philosophical questions that we face.
You will excuse me if I am skeptical
of the
philosophical musings
of a man so spectacularly ignorant
of natural history that he
thinks the World began with one man, one woman and a possessed, talking snake».
I was enlightened by this program and by its biblical and
philosophical grounding instantly upon encountering it; and my agreement with it is a chief reason
of the extensive indebtedness
of my
thinking to Pannenberg's.
Scholasticism Theology moved from the monastery to the university Western theology is an intellectual discipline rather than a mystical pursuit Western theology is over-systematized Western Theology is systematized, based on a legal model rather than a
philosophical model Western theologians debate like lawyers, not like rabbis Reformation Catholic reformers were excommunicated and formed Protestant churches Western churches become guarantors
of theological schools
of thought Western church membership is often contingent on fine points
of doctrine Some western Christians believe that definite beliefs are incompatible with tolerance The atmosphere arose in which anyone could start a church The legal model for western theology intensifies despite the rediscovery
of the East
They mis - underestimate the god in whom they disbelieve,
thinking their imagined deity the God
of classical religious and
philosophical tradition.
Although certainly useful for developing Catholic
thought about beauty, the particular strength and importance
of Poetry, Beauty, and Contemplation rests in Trapani's ability to show how Maritain's aesthetics have significance beyond strictly
philosophical or theological domains.
Truth and Method is «one
of the great
philosophical works
of the twentieth century» because it leads us where the modern mind» «which as a matter
of fact is in a hopeless impasse,» notes Gadamer» will not go, resists going with every
thought, yet absolutely needs to go.
San, I
think BRMT04's statements are arguably bigoted because many
of the «
philosophical differences» are simply false.
While the general topic
of lex talionis is always a fun
philosophical discussion, I don't
think it applies to what is going on in Israel right now.
Together they were elaborating a
philosophical position which boldly challenged traditional modes
of thinking and came to be called «The Chicago School»
of philosophy.
It is easier to defend the idea that the bible is not the word
of god, but simply a history
of human
thought and just as we discard old scientific ideas when we have new information, we discard old
philosophical ideas.
It seemed to me that the truly sovereign God could not be regarded as absent or superfluous in ordinary human experience and
philosophical reflection, but that every single reality should prove incomprehensible (at least in its depth) without recourse to God, if he actually was the Creator
of the world as Barth
thought him to be.
Here lies the basis in Whitehead's
thought for the relation
of philosophical theology to questions
of values and ethics — and, therefore,
of religion to politics.
Whitehead's
philosophical thinking about time begins with questions about passage as a character
of nature.
These seeds
of Bishop Barron have been developed within Fr Holloway's
philosophical writings and have produced a fruitful crop within the
thought and work
of Faith.
On a far higher level, intellectually and spiritually, is that very noble
philosophical poem called the Wisdom
of Solomon, and that still nobler monument
of ancient Hebrew
thought, the Book
of Job, a dramatic dialogue in splendid and sonorous verse upon the theme
of suffering and its place in a providential order.
The Folly
of Scientism Austin L Hughes, a professor
of biology at the University
of South Carolina, has written a perceptive,
thought - provoking article in The New Atlantis magazine, concurring with my own view
of current
philosophical trends in popular scientific presentations.2 One
of these trends is «scientism», the view that science is the only source
of truth and reality.
The
philosophical discussions
of justice after Plato have not been the most fruitful bases for radical social
thought.
The Bishop rightly alerts the listeners to the obvious self - refuting nature
of scientism; he emphasises that truth can surely be found in non-scientific forms such as poetry and literature; and then finally, he offers the building blocks for a
philosophical argument that the intelligibility
of the universe, and thereby the possibility
of any science, in some way demonstrates a
thinking mind behind the universe.
This appropriation
of Neoplatonism, culminating with the Pseudo-Dionysius and Maximus the Confessor, allowed Christian thinkers to incorporate into their
thought such Neoplatonic features as the primacy
of beauty and the metaphysics
of descent and ascent, and thereby to lay the
philosophical foundations
of nearly all future Christian humanism.
But we may, I
think, conclude with Errol Harris (AT 74) that from the Hegelian perspective, the
philosophical shortcomings
of classical logic extend to mathematical logic as well, and that as logic
of the understanding, both deal with the «abstract concept
of class or aggregate,» and are both inextricably connected with a metaphysics
of externally related particulars that lose themselves in a «spurious infinite,» and with a concomitant mechanical cosmology.
This intuition
of Taoism (and I
think of Christianity and other religious traditions also) makes somewhat pretentious the
philosophical demand that all reality show itself phenomenally.
Far from being a rhetorical trope or a
philosophical tool, analogy for Przywara is the style
of thought that best corresponds to the way in which being makes itself known.
In spite
of the impression some death -
of - God writers may give, this line
of thought is based not on the Revelation but altogether on
philosophical considerations.
Wolfhart Pannenberg concluded his incisive overview
of the period with the observation that one must «spare the Christian doctrine
of God from the gap between the incomprehensible essence and the historical action
of God, by virtue
of which each threatens to make the other impossible,» and went on to state that «in the recasting
of the
philosophical concept
of God by early Christian theology considerable remnants were left out, which have become a burden in the history
of Christian
thought.»
Act and Being, like his dissertation Sanctorum Communio, is fundamental to any attempt to appreciate Bonhoeffer's
thought within the context
of theological and
philosophical debate.
«1 But despite Plato's insight that power is involved in both the ability to affect and the ability to be affected (with its implication that reality and value might involve both), there has been a persistent tendency to favor what Bernard Loomer has called unilateral power — the ability to affect while remaining unaffected.2 Although this tendency is evident in every field
of human
thought, it will be appropriate to examine it first in the
philosophical tradition, where it goes hand in hand with the valuation
of being over becoming.
As traditional theology was a relatively well defined system, the same in certain basic respects — despite all sorts
of philosophical and ecclesiastical differences — in Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Maimonides, Leibniz, Calvin, Immanuel Kant, and some schools
of Hindu
thought, so the new theology which many be contrasted with the old is found more or less fully and consistently represented in thinkers as far apart as William James,... Henri Bergson, F. R. Tennant,... A. N. Whitehead,... Nicholas Berdyaev,... and in numerous others
of every brand
of Protestantism, besides a few... Roman Catholics.
On this basis existentialist philosophers revolted against the deterministic
philosophical theories which dominated a great deal
of thought at the end
of the nineteenth century.
So what I
thought was this crazy
philosophical concept
of love, was nothing more that a choice to be present and connected.
For Metz the primary problem
of Christianity today is not that its doctrines are unclear or out
of contact with current scientific and
philosophical thought, but that its practice is not faithful.
Also, I should say that it seemingly puts Jesus is the company
of other great
philosophical and religious teachers who essentially say the same sorts
of things, in their own contexts and in their own times as to how to find «eternal life» a phrase I
think speaks
of a qualitative type
of life, a flourishing, if you will, both now and after death.
In general, taking the objects for
philosophical analysis from the data
of sense perception leaves us in the grip
of substance
thinking even when we acknowledge that we can not discover substances in or through our sensory experience.
I
think coming from a fundamentalist background, seeing the Greek
philosophical uses
of this terminology helps me recover a sense
of a non-legalistic meaning and it avoids the problem
of how you could be righteous without actually fully being so.
Philosophical thought of men like, say, Russell and Dewey or even Hegel may be dazzling but it's sober and uncharismatic.
From the perspective
of theology as we understand it, all human divisions, systems, social and political institutions, all
philosophical thoughts, find themselves on the same level, on the side
of the created world in its corruption and promise.
The Chicago School
of Theology made much
of its opposition to
philosophical idealism; but its strategy
of thought in transmuting evolution into something other than mechanistic naturalism was actually dictated and directed by the vestigial remains
of its own personal idealism.