About Blog Bernardo Kastrup's exploratory journeys through the thoughtscapes
of philosophy of mind, ontology, neuroscience of consciousness, psychology, foundations of physics, hermeneutics and philosophy of life.
In this new age of technology the examination
of the philosophy of mind / body dualism takes on entire new dimensions.
While I was taking the engineering degree at NYU, I used to moonlight a bit and take philosophy and psychology courses, and I began to be much more interested in the whole area
of the philosophy of mind and the way in which psychology tried to explain some of our cognitions and related behaviors.
We now should be aware of how important questions
of the philosophy of mind are for our understanding of creativity.
In an article first published in 1982, wonderfully titled «How Moral Agents Became Ghosts, or, Why the History of Ethics Diverged from
That of the Philosophy of Mind,» MacIntyre writes, «At the beginning of modern moral philosophy — which I date in the 1780s — the moral agent as traditionally understood almost, if not quite, disappeared from view.
Not exact matches
For Trent Porter, certified financial planner and owner
of Priority Financial Partners, the question
of investment
philosophy brings to
mind the active - versus - passive debate.
Dr. Weil's
philosophy of health addresses
mind, body, and spirit, and focuses on achieving optimal health.
He also has a master's in
philosophy, with a focus on biology, cognitive science, and
philosophy of mind.
«As technology continues to change education in remarkable ways, and hundreds
of entrepreneurs, teachers, and investors put their
minds to harnessing its promise, it's still worth reading Sal Khan's description
of his serendipitous entry, unpretentious
philosophy, and profound impact on the world
of education.
There is no doubt in my
mind that their pro-entrepreneur
philosophy is part
of a grander vision.
We as a people, have to be open
minded and try to understand what is the true
philosophy of people.
The
Mind and the Brain is his attempt to unseat that philosophy and substitute a dualist conception of mind (according to which mind and brain are ontologically distin
Mind and the Brain is his attempt to unseat that
philosophy and substitute a dualist conception
of mind (according to which mind and brain are ontologically distin
mind (according to which
mind and brain are ontologically distin
mind and brain are ontologically distinct).
According to The New Encyclopædia Britannica, the one called St.Augustine's «
mind was the crucible in which the religion
of the New Testament was most completely fused with the Platonic tradition
of Greek
philosophy; and it was also the means by which the product
of this fusion was transmitted to the Christendoms
of medieval Roman Catholicism and Renaissance Protestantism.»
Along the way, Kass cites this from the introduction to The Phenomenon
of Life: «A
philosophy of life comprises the
philosophy of the organism and the
philosophy of mind.
In all his masterful displaying
of the ideas,
philosophies, and artistic representations
of reality that have captured
minds and souls over these five hundred years, where does Jacques Barzun stand?
«It is true, that a little
philosophy inclineth man's
mind to atheism, but depth in
philosophy bringeth men's
minds about to religion; for while the
mind of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the chain
of them confederate, and linked together, it must needs fly to Providence and Deity.»
I simply believe that many
of you have made up your
minds based upon what I referred to in my post to Dal as the «matter - energy / chance»
philosophy.
Perhaps materialism was a liberating
philosophy when the need was to escape from dogmas
of religion, but today materialism itself is the dogma from which the
mind needs to escape.
SCIENCE AND CONSCIOUSNESS John Searle, professor
of philosophy at the University
of California, Berkeley, has been writing for years and years on the quandaries
of the brain -
mind - consciousness connections.
For graduate students, the situation is little better, as they tend to be forced into narrow niche disciplines (
philosophy of mind,
philosophy of action).
«They allege, finally, that our perennial
philosophy is only a
philosophy of immutable essences, while the contemporary
mind must look to the existence
of things and to life, which is ever in flux.»
Like Polanyi, Fr Holloway sees that «the paradox
of all these totalitarian
philosophies is that they emanate from the
minds of individuals, and their intrinsic certainty does not therefore transcend the individual and limited
minds from which they proceed.»
He calls it «the
philosophy of Scientific Positivism» (M & M) and says that it stands for «the government
of life by the principles and factual findings
of the human
mind.»
Such a mentality, ignorant
of sociology,
of economics,
of psychology,
of physics,
of biology, is intolerable to young and virile
minds trained in the tradition
of the modern sciences, and the
philosophies of existentialism that derive from them.
When however to the legacy
of criticisms ancient and near - modern there is added the firm acceptance
of evolutionary
philosophies of materialism or idealism contradictory in trend to Christian teaching, then every new difficulty, every fresh confusion
of unabsorbed knowledge, every apparent retreat
of conscious
mind before reflex conditioned action, is taken as a new refutation
of traditional Christian belief.
One
of the most interesting areas
of modern
philosophy is the
philosophy of the
mind.
But he went much further, arguing that Christian
philosophy, like that
of Aristotle, should be empirical: it should proceed from what can be grasped by the senses — and not, as the Augustinian tradition held, by what can be grasped purely by the
Mind.
2 For a detailed discussion
of this argument see Edward Feser,
Philosophy of Mind (Oxford: OneWorld, 2005), 29 - 38.
With the
philosophy of Rene Descartes (1596 - 1650), the nature
of reality was no longer seen as writ large over the universe only to be discovered by the exercise
of reason but rather was what the human
mind perceived, interpreted, made it to be («Cogito, ergo sum.
Further, process is the
philosophy of organism — matter and
mind are related holistically.
In «Experience,
Mind and the Concept,» The Journal
of Philosophy 21/21 (Oct., 1924)(reprinted in Hepler, ed., Seeking A Faith for a New Age: Essays on the Interdependence
of Religion, Science and
Philosophy, Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press.
So by stating that there must be a Christian presence in government you're kinda unconsciously outlining the
mind controlling hypocrisy you're indoctrinated into,
of early Byzantine cultists who subverted a good religion and plugged 2000 years
of pagan rituals into a
philosophy that was about love and created the most hypocritical, torturous, murderous, blasphemous, demonic and satanic era
of human history, that would have made the devil himself, if he happens to be real, enthralled and delighted at the inhuman acts perpetrated by men who's skill lay only in great fornication and great defilements, that can only be possessed by those that truly revel in the pain and the blood
of the innocent.
For many other scientists, however, and for people
of a modernistic bent
of mind who saw in the sciences «a new messiah,» or at least a directive
of life displacing both religion and
philosophy, this preoccupation with the immediacies to the exclusion
of ultimates meant frankly a secularizing
of life, that is, a relinquishing
of all ideal or transcendent aspects which hope and wonder might evoke.
Not only is the mutable world separated from its divine principle — the One — by intervals
of emanation that descend in ever greater alienation from their source, but because the highest truth is the secret identity between the human
mind and the One, the labor
of philosophy is one
of escape: all multiplicity, change, particularity, every feature
of the living world, is not only accidental to this formless identity, but a kind
of falsehood, and to recover the truth that dwells within, one must detach oneself from what lies without, including the sundry incidentals
of one's individual existence; truth is oblivion
of the flesh, a pure nothingness, to attain which one must sacrifice the world.
Which yields the — to my
mind — gratifying conclusion that, to be both a «lover
of wisdom» and an accomplished humorist, one must almost certainly be a Christian; or, rather, that only a Christian
philosophy can be truly «comic.»
Here I introduce that exploration with a brief characterization
of the metaphysical position especially as it is stated by Alfred North Whitehead; Whitehead's is the seminal
mind which provided the main structure
of thought which is process
philosophy.47 Whitehead has a close affinity to the classical metaphysical tradition.
In his essay, The Gospel and Culture, Voegelin explains that this deculturation doesn't manifest itself as an ideology, or as a «post-Christian» or «postmodern» age proudly positing a «new» system or a unique differentiation
of myth,
philosophy, or revelation that will «save» man, but rather it is a psychopathology, a disease
of the
mind, that reveals itself in second realities, egophanic revolt, and a host
of similar disorders.
There can be no doubt that the author
of these words also had in
mind the purpose
of a novel, perhaps one that would help break the spell
of current assumptions in order to surprise us with the complicated truth about ourselves — with more dreams than we have dared to dream in what passes for our
philosophy.
Suffice it to say that much interesting work could be done in connecting Whitehead's concepts to more current topics
of discussion in metaphysics,
philosophy of language, and
philosophy of mind.
«Whitehead's
Philosophy and Some General Notions
of Physics and Biology,» in John B. Cobb, Jr., and David Ray Griffin, eds.,
Mind in Nature.
Here is the cosmological emphasis that is so predominant in process
philosophy; furthermore, here is a
philosophy of mind in which — unlike Husserl and very much like Whitehead — the conscious ego is not the initial datum, but just a higher unity
of more basic intentional acts.
This philosophical direction
of my
mind led me into
philosophy of religion and later into philosophical theology.
Paradoxically, it is the manifestation
of this European
mind, set in an African context, which dramatizes that his
philosophy of civilization is pro-Western.
This correlation
of the respective «subjects»
of phenomenology and process
philosophy must be kept in
mind throughout the remainder
of this analysis.
This impulse which in our time is so irresistibly attracting all open
minds towards a
philosophy that comprises at once a theoretical system, a rule
of action, a religion and a presentiment, heralds and denotes, in my view, the effective, physical fulfillment
of all living beings.
MN — David Ray Griffin, «Whitehead's
Philosophy and Some General Notions
of Physics and Biology,»
Mind in Nature: Essays on the Interface
of Science and
Philosophy, edited by John B. Cobb, Jr., and David Ray Griffin.
Does the epitaph about «Barabbas» come to
mind when considering the arms
of Muslim theological
philosophies in this days» eras?
In rejecting Allan Bloom's The Closing
of the American
Mind as yet another example
of «that old - time [Platonic]
Philosophy» which presupposes an objective foundation for an elitist social agenda, Rorty quite properly endorses Dewey's view
of the need to develop literacy in all our citizens.
He agrees with all three that
philosophy's first task is to describe the operations
of the human
mind based on direct introspection
of these operations and the ideas that are their contents.
Long before Bacon, Jaki has written, Christian
philosophy had steadily inculcated «the conviction... that since the world was rational it could be comprehended by the human
mind, but as the product
of the Creator it could not be derived from the
mind of man, a creature.»