Sentences with phrase «of philosophy paper»

There's no level of philosophy paper that our philosophy dissertation writing help can't create.

Not exact matches

«This is not to say that headhunters do not play a valuable role,» said Max Steuer, reader emeritus at the LSE Centre for Philosophy and one of the authors of the paper.

The proceedings of the sixteenth conference, held at Villanova University, is just out — 606 pages of papers chock - full of thoughtful articles on law, philosophy, ethics, culture, and politics.

The purpose of this paper is to explore some of the implications for process philosophy of a new approach to brain psychology and the dynamics of the mental state — microgenetic theory — that has developed out of the study of symptoms in neurological cases.

After joining the faculty in philosophy at Harvard University in 1925, where he began editing the collected papers of C. S. Peirce, Charles Hartshorne also served as an assistant to Alfred North Whitehead.

Since the theme of this symposium is the meaning of process thought for us, my paper will discuss the use that I have made of this mode of thinking to articulate and develop my views, especially in the philosophy of religion.

In this paper I shall investigate the interpretive method which Wolfe Mays brings to Whitehead's later philosophy as well as the resultant interpretation, particularly in The Philosophy of Whitephilosophy as well as the resultant interpretation, particularly in The Philosophy of WhitePhilosophy of Whitehead (PW).

In this paper our first task will be to try to indicate both the adequacy and applicability of Whitehead's philosophy to Marx's social analysis.

In the second part of the paper I will offer some reflections on the unexpected value of a process interpretation of the Trinity for the enterprise of process philosophy as such.

The article by J. P. Moreland, «An Enduring Self: The Achilles» Heel of Process Philosophy» (PS 17: 193), focuses more on the problem of personal identity, but it is concerned with the general part - whole and unity problem that this present paper is attempting to sharpen.

The argument of this paper was presented at the meeting of the Society for the Study of Process Philosophy on March 18.

If these properties should change, the whole philosophy, without necessarily breaking down, must adapt itself and readjust the relation between its parts; like a design on a sheet of paper which undergoes modification when the paper is curved.

Editor's Introduction A large set of class notes, papers, clippings, etc., compiled by the late George Bosworth Burch, for many years Fletcher Professor of Philosophy at Tufts University, has been donated to the Harvard University Archives by his widow, Betty Brand Burch.

Unfortunately, Whitehead's own notion of «being present in another entity» is obscure in itself and has remained obscure in many of the interpretations of his philosophy heretofore presented.1 This paper attempts to indicate the direction in which a clarification of Whitehead's concept of causal objectification2 might proceed.

Then I shall attempt to say — and this is the principal point of my paper — what kind of discourse on freedom philosophy can articulate, beyond psychological and political discourse, that will still merit the name of «discourse» on religious freedom.

In this issue's Cutting Edge column we offer some extracts from the introduction to a philosopher - physicist's paper at the 2009 Vatican - sponsored conference on the philosophy of evolution which clearly lays the foundation for such development.

Thus, this paper is not an account of Whitehead's theory of perception solely in terms of the categories of the philosophy of organism; rather, it is a critique of the coherence of that theory from a point of view outside it.

1Although «process hermeneutics» is used here principally in reference to NTIPP and OTIPP, these collections are products of conversations that began with a conference on Biblical theology and process philosophy, held at Christian Theological Seminary, Indianapolis, in 1974, whose papers were published in Encounter 36/4 (1975), PS 4/3 (1974) 159 - 86, and LG 29 - 44.

Although Whitehead's philosophy of organism is an explicitly metaphysical theory and Piaget's genetic theory of cognition is markedly a naturalistic theory, the first part of this paper contends that an extensive relationship exists between the two theories.

16An earlier version of this paper was delivered as the plenary address at the annual meeting of the Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy in Evanston, Illinois in March 1989.

The paper was printed in the 1967 summer issue of Cross Currents but mistakenly entitled «Catholic Philosophy and the Death of God.

Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for the Study of Process Philosophies, held in Philadelphia, PA, March 12, 1987.

This extended version of the paper was also presented at the meeting of the Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy in Buffalo, New York, March 3 - 4, 1990.

In this paper, I want to challenge this interpretation, because it is at least one - sided and this one - sidedness has some important consequences, both for the interpretation of Whitehead's philosophy itself and for the claim that this philosophy is a valid contemporary metaphysics, addressing all basic metaphysical issues in an intelligible war.

(Anscombe's critique of Lewis, her first purely philosophical publication, appeared in the Socratic Digest [Oxford] in 1948 and is reprinted, with comments by her about the debate, in volume two of her collected papers, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind.)

14 See my paper, «Action, Responsibility, and the Problem of Personal Identity» (Society for the Study of Process Philosophies, Spring, 1976; available from the Center for Process Studies).

1This paper was inspired by some critical comments of Michael J. Vater of Marquette University concerning my address on Hartshorne to the Marquette Philosophy Department in April, 1984.

I took the same attitude on the roles of science and philosophy in my first major paper on evolution in 1931.

My purpose in this paper is to state and discuss several criticisms of process philosophy that are raised or that can be raised from the standpoint of Christian faith.1

1See his paper, «Whitehead and Modern Science» in Mind In Nature: Essays on the Interface of Science and Philosophy, edited by John B. Cobb, Jr. and David R. Griffin (University Press of America.

Forty - three papers on the philosophy, principles, methods, and applications of TA, and the relation of TA to other therapies.

Thorpe formulates the problem as a challenge to process philosophy and, after papers by Birch, Dobzhansky, and Waddington, and comments by Cobb on the potential contribution of Whitehead, Thorpe shares his concluding reflections.

This paper has suggested significant agreements in perspective between Deutsch's communications model and Whitehead's metaphysics for humanity's political life in order to encourage the fashioning of an organic political philosophy.

This paper will attempt an assessment of Leclerc's radical position, using as a foil the thought of the baroque scholastic, Francis Suarez.5 The latter was picked to fulfill such a function both because he represents the most complete summation of the older Aristotelian theory of substance Leclerc attempts to appropriate and reinterpret, and because he was the most important scholastic figure for the age that Leclerc sees as both the turning point in the history of the philosophy of nature, and as the golden age of such a philosophy, namely, the modern age (PN 194 - 95).

This paper is an attempt to state some of the analytical similarities between Deutsch and Whitehead in the hope that they will provide organic philosophy with a clearer sense of the terrain upon which it can discover the form and content of its own particular political speech.

I have analyzed this principle elsewhere; in this paper I deal only with those aspects of it that Whitehead believes to have been rooted in Descartes» philosophy.

In 1908, at the International Congress of Philosophy in Heidelberg, Royce delivered a paper entitled «The Problem of Truth in the Light of Recent Discussion.»

Sustainability makes good business sense, and is at the forefront of our business philosophy in the creation of some of the world's most distinctive and technically advanced paper products.

This source apparently told the paper that the Spaniard said, «Do you imagine how much fun it would be for us to go to Arsenal and coach a squad full of so much attacking talent that matches our philosophy completely?

Rebecca Kukla, professor of philosophy and internal medicine at the University of South Florida, voiced these concerns in a 2006 paper examining the campaign.

Einstein's 1905 papers are breathtaking in ambition and scope, drawing on philosophy and thought problems as well as on the research of his time.

The paper, «Unproven Stem Cell - based Interventions and Achieving a Compromise Policy Among the Multiple Stakeholders,» was co-authored by Kirstin Matthews, a lecturer in natural sciences at Rice and fellow in science and technology policy at the Baker Institute, and Ana Iltis, a professor of philosophy and director of Wake Forest's Center for Bioethics, Health and Society.

«My philosophy is I could focus on publishing 20 really good papers or also make sure that I train 20 really good scientists who then each publish 20 really good papers,» says professor Graeme Mardon at Baylor College of Medicine.

Insoo Hyun, an associate professor of bioethics and philosophy from Case Western Reserve University in Ohio who is not involved in the research, explains how these two papers are fueling the debate.

You should call this approach the «Risk Generalization - Particularization» model of medical prediction, Jonathan Fuller and Luis Flores write in a paper to be published in Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.

Nobody, for example, needs another paper on the philosophy of primary health care without any indication of the type of staff and training requirements, facilities and infrastructure needed to implement it.

In a 1996 paper in the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Richards wrote that it was a fallacy to view the trade in terms of the «greedy rich» and the «exploited poor.»

Max Steuer, Reader Emeritus at the LSE Centre for Philosophy and one of the authors of the paper, said: «The executive search firms spoke to us candidly about the difficulty of determining in advance how well a person will perform as a CEO in the long run interests of a firm.

Lowe's paper is more than a defence of the phenomenological approach to the philosophy of perception.

It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.