The meat industry is trying to make it sound like the inclusion
of pink slime in ground beef somehow makes our entire ground beef supply safer.
This report on pink slime will bring you up to speed on the
development of pink slime, the controversy, and potential effects of the additive.
Meanwhile, David Knowles, the writer at The Daily who originally reported on USDA's continued
use of pink slime in school food, interviewed me yesterday about the petition.
It is unclear whether the USDA and meat distributors will ever agree to mark the presence
of pink slime on meat packages for several reasons.
Unpleasantly chewy bits of what I can only describe as gristle, though they were not visible, seemed to stud the
meat of the pink slime burger.
Some people will have never
heard of pink slime before they read about it on McDonald's own website.
Allison — Normally I'd write a much longer answer but since I'm in the
middle of this pink slime petition campaign, let me point you to one of the best resources on the Internet for people getting started in trying to improve school food on a local level.
Hy - Vee (in Iowa) just announced yesterday they are ceasing use
of pink slime due to customer concerns.
According to the business press, meat packers are likely to lose a record $ 101 per head as a
result of the pink slime crisis.
And if the benefits /
harms of pink slime are unknown, why are the consumers treated as guinea pigs and without awareness?
We already knew the pink slime option was cheaper — that's the whole
point of pink slime — but now there might be an even greater cost differential for schools if they need to expend their own funds on labor to convert bulk beef to patties.
Further, for the usda not having on the label on the packages of ground beef that state what percentage of the product is «finely texturized» or «additionally processed», is a down right attempt to conceal the use
of this pink slime product a secret.
The New York Times recounts the
history of pink slime and reminds us that Michael Moss won a won a Pulitzer Prize for an article in which he mentions it in 2010.
The USDA is planning on purchasing 7 million pounds
of the pink slime from BPI for our country's wonderful school lunch program and says it totally «meet [s] the highest standard for food safety.»
I'm not explicitly supporting the
use of pink slime in school lunches or anywhere else for that matter, before I do I would have to see rigorous scientific proof (from someone other than the FDA or its benefactors) that this stuff can not cause harm to human health to degrees greater than consumption of regular meat.
It was a call that led to hundreds of millions of dollars for Beef Products Inc., the
makers of pink slime,» wrote ABC.
While my petition focused on the use
of pink slime in school food, I feel strongly that the media firestorm we created and the overwhelming response to the petition was animated by another concern as well: many Americans were learning for the first time about this substance and the fact that it's in, reportedly, 70 % of our ground beef without any sort of labeling for those who wish to avoid it.
The story was uplifting, a nice antidote to the constant reports of industrial ag gone wrong,
of pink slime and herbicide - resistant super-weeds.
Food Safety News was kind enough to reprint my refutation of the beef industry's defenses
of pink slime, and leading food safety lawyer Bill Marler also weighed in in his own post yesterday, supporting disclosure of pink slime on labels.
Can't believe any sane person would defend the use
of pink slime or any other such crap by any self - respecting business or govt.
While I think many people like yourself try to rationalize and justify the use
of pink slime, the «real crime» here is not that pink slime was developed but concealed and disguised by a federal department.
But we can't because the power of the federal government, ie usda, continues to defend the use
of pink slime.