Interviewed prospective clients and assisted the attorney in the evaluation
of plaintiff cases to determine legal matter.
Hence the conspiracy element based on Oreskes «Merchants of Doubt» and the Scripps La Jolla meeting in 2012 is an essential part
of the plaintiff case on order to claim monetary damages.
Not exact matches
The lead
plaintiff in that
case, Jacqueline Halbig, was a director
of the White House Office
of Faith Based and Community Initiatives under George W. Bush.
Additionally, courts have dismissed
cases arising out
of the recall because the
plaintiff could not establish that she purchased a defective package.
The
plaintiffs in that
case claim Facebook broke Illinois state law on the issue
of biometric privacy.
Disney shareholders lost their
case but the final ruling set a new bar for directors when approving these kinds
of exit packages: «If a director acts with conscious disregard — in other words, a looking away — rather than a deliberate intent to violate his duties, he can still be held liable for acting in bad faith,»
plaintiffs» attorney Steven G. Schullman told the New York Times back in 2006.
In any
case, in addition to the court - determined fair value price, the
plaintiff also gets accrued interest
of 5 % over the federal funds rate.
In a federal trademark infringement
case, for instance, a
plaintiff seeking a quick injunction would encounter at the threshold the high hurdle
of showing «irreparable harm» — a standard that won't be met if money damages will provide the
plaintiff with adequate recompense for any damages incurred — and it might also have to post an expensive bond (a major hurdle for a nonprofit).
The strongly worded ruling from Judge Leon was in a
case brought against the governors
of the Federal Reserve by a group
of plaintiffs including the National Association
of Convenience Stores, the National Retail Federation, the Food Marketing Institute, Miller Oil Co., Boscov's Department Store and the National Restaurant Association.
«The court rejected (the
plaintiff's) theory that the newspaper's publication violated her right to privacy because her post to MySpace was made virtually to everyone with an internet connection,» Zaller wrote in a blog post two years ago, asserting the
case could apply to situations
of employees posting on social media.
David Sanford, chairman
of Sanford Heisler Sharp, the law firm that argued the largest - ever employment gender discrimination
case to go to trial — a class action suit against Novartis Pharmaceuticals that resulted in a $ 253 million jury award for
plaintiffs in 2010, reduced post-trial to $ 175 million — noted that in that
case, the company had just three investigators for a workforce
of thousands.
If both sides, through their eyes and their people's eyes, have concluded that the
plaintiff is absolutely going to win this
case, and the
plaintiff is going to get a lot
of money because they're totally on board with everything that has been presented, then that might be a good reason for the defendant to agree to a settlement with the
plaintiff for less money than the potential exposure if the jury comes back and finds willful infringement.
The district has been perceived to be a favorable jurisdiction for
plaintiffs in patent infringement lawsuits, which win 88 %
of the time compared to a nation - wide average
of 68 % in 2006, [6] even, according to some claims, in dubious
cases (i.e. patent trolls).
Contrary to what the
plaintiffs in the
case were claiming, there was no «flooding»
of any sort, according to the solar industry association in response to the court ruling.
When the International Trade Court ruled in favor
of plaintiffs Suniva and SolarWorld in their
case against cheap Chinese solar module and cell imports, reactions were polarized: the U.S. solar industry was outraged — as it had been for most
of the duration
of the court investigation — and investors, apparently, were extremely upbeat for the future
of this same outraged industry, sending solar stocks sky - high.
The move struck observers as odd because most
plaintiffs seeking damages usually hope to settle the
case by leveraging the deep pockets
of an insurer.
The proposed act has also garnished the attention
of Theo Chino, virtual currency entrepreneur and
plaintiff in the Chino v. the New York Department
of Financial Services (NYDFS)
case.
DOL filed a motion Friday requesting that the three lawsuits pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District
of Texas be consolidated; the
plaintiffs agreed to consolidation but insisted that each
of the
cases be allowed to «retain their separate identities» and move forward «expeditiously.»
DOL filed a request on June 20 that the three lawsuits pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District
of Texas be consolidated; the
plaintiffs agreed to consolidation but insisted that each
of the
cases be allowed to «retain their separate identities» and move forward «expeditiously.»
The
plaintiffs» motion states that in June 14 and 15 conference calls, counsel for the three sets
of plaintiffs stated that they supported coordination or consolidation, «subject to the parties» agreement that these three
cases will retain their separate identities, allowing each set
of plaintiffs to file separate briefs, make separate oral arguments, and independently make other litigation decisions.»
Wagner: While the Intel
case is an offshoot
of the excess fee and stock drop
cases and utilizes many
of the same legal theories, I doubt the new complaint will open up new opportunities for the
plaintiffs» bar, since its underlying facts are fairly unique, specifically that an individual account plan offered alternative investments.
The main
case, filed in Delaware's Chancery Court, is heading toward resolution;
plaintiffs may try to add this latest stock grant to the bill
of particulars.
The first line
of cases began with In re Daou Sys., where the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court's decision dismissing a Section 10 (b) action on the ground that the
plaintiffs had not alleged any disclosures that defendants were engaging in improper accounting practices.
The district court in First Solar ultimately applied the standard from the Daou line
of cases and held that
plaintiffs did not need to show that the market reacted to the fact that First Solar had committed fraud in order to satisfy the loss causation requirement.
Plaintiffs in the court
case that threw out the Department
of Labor's fiduciary rule declared «complete victory» against the rule and said the way is now clear for the Securities and Exchange Commission to create a new standard that would apply across financial disciplines.
In the single most egregious
case of alleged fraud, BP sued Mikal Watts in December 2013, alleging that the powerful San Antonio
plaintiffs» attorney falsely claimed to represent tens
of thousands
of «phantom» victims
of the -LSB-...]
Over the past decade, nearly 40 percent
of all patent
cases in the U.S. have been filed in Marshall and Tyler, Texas, two places known for their
plaintiff - friendly decisions and sky - high court costs.
One
of them, involving the state
of California, looks to have been a sound legal ruling: the Court dismissed the
case for lack
of standing
of the
plaintiffs.
In the Texas
case,
plaintiff's lawyers are going for multimillions in damages, and to get that kind
of money are claiming that not only the diocese but the National Conference
of Catholic Bishops (NCCB) and its operating arm, the United States Catholic Conference (USCC), are liable for not properly supervising the priests in question.
AT the end
of the Prop 8 appeals
Case in California, the judge asked the
plaintiff's attorney how exactly SS marriage threatens traditional marriage.
Lively, with representation by Liberty Counsel (an evangelical legal organization), responded that in both the U.S. and Uganda he exercised constitutionally protected speech rights; that he opposes violence and neither committed nor plotted any; that Uganda did not in fact pass a proposed draconian anti-gay law, and that in any
case Uganda's political institutions, instead
of himself, are responsible for its political decisions; and that the court lacks jurisdiction and the
plaintiffs lack standing.
Raymond Abbott's name appeared as lead
plaintiff in a court
case brought by Camden and several other poor school districts against the State
of New Jersey, demanding that the state provide equal funding for all schools.
The
case was found in favor
of the
plaintiffs in a $ 32 million award.
In its first
case to address the ministerial exception doctrine in light
of the Supreme Court's Hosanna - Tabor ruling, the court held that
plaintiff Philip Cannata, a music director, was a «minister» for purposes
of the ministerial exception doctrine.
But yesterday saw one
of the first rulings to address the merits
of lawsuits by nonprofit
plaintiffs (39
cases and counting), notes Religion Clause, which has...
Thus it was in the celebrated
case of Rylands v. Fletcher (1868) in the law
of tort, in which water from the defendant's reservoir had flooded the mines
of the
plaintiff and put them out
of use.
The high percentages
of cases won by amparo
plaintiffs and the great volume
of cases initiated each year demonstrate that the Mexican judiciary is an important allocator
of values, scarce resources, and sanctions in the National political system.
He joined with a number
of other DC residents on the
case but was the lead
plaintiff in Jackson v District
of Columbia Board
of Elections.
With extensive expert testimony, the
plaintiffs made the
case that secular humanism functions in many respects for its adherents as a religion (with ministers, fellowship, ceremonies marking the milestones
of life, and a missionary program), and that it has many
of the substantive characteristics
of a religion as well, including a coherent interpretation
of all
of reality.
I thought the judge said that the
plaintiff didn't make his
case... it was lack
of evidence, officially, not because
of religion.
He adds, «Where we might have hoped for a level
of calm analysis and civic, even civil, discussion
of the
case in all
of its humanity and complexity, we have been given little more than banner headlines, orchestrated press conferences, serial fascination with priestly deviancy, and
plaintiff strategy.»
Kyle Duncan, general counsel
of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty who argued the
case, says this is a significant victory for religious
plaintiffs (including schools with similar lawsuits, like Biola University, Liberty University, and Tyndale House Publishers).
The
plaintiffs» lawyers, Eric Rassbach and Diana Verm, pointed out that even the person the
case is now against — the new Secretary
of Health and Human Services, Thomas Price — is on their side.
Can a line be drawn between the
plaintiffs in this
case and a majority
of stockholders in a publicly - traded corporation who want their corporation to reflect some consensus religious belief?
Investor advocate, Mark Elliott — who recently won a class action on behalf
of investors in Downer EDI — lodged the claim on behalf
of investor John Webster, who will act as «lead
plaintiff» in the
case on behalf
of other investors who join the action.
In the
case, Grocery Manufacturers Association v. Sorrell (No. 5:14 - cv - 117), the Grocery Manufacturers Association, Snack Food Association, International Dairy Foods Association, and National Association
of Manufacturers (the «
Plaintiffs») are challenging Vermont's Act 120, which requires that certain foods sold at retail stores in Vermont bear mandatory labeling if they contain genetically - engineered ingredients.
In that
case Gaidry, a manufacturer
of a sauce labelled «Tabasco Pepper Sauce,» brought suit against McIlhenny Company for damages for alleged wrongful conduct in interfering with the
plaintiff's business by falsely and in bad faith representing to dealers throughout the country that it had an exclusive trade - mark in the name «Tabasco,» and threatening injunction and other legal proceedings against those who handled any sauce called «Tabasco» not made by the said McIlhenny Company.
«The Fair Labor Standards Act provides employees the ability to join forces in a «collective action» and seek justice from large corporations that they could not afford to bring on their own,» said David Lichter, a co-founder and partner
of Higer Lichter & Givner, one
of the law firms representing
plaintiffs in this
case.
In addition, in the event the criminal
case went to trial, one
of the defense attorneys would have spent a little time on the
plaintiff being in a bar at age 18, «Tell me, miss, how did you get into the bar?
Had the
Plaintiff gone to Sparrow's ER on the morning
of the 12th and had a SANE nurse do a rape kit there might have been pubic hair samples or semen samples, both which might produce DNA evidence which would strengthen the prosecution
case.