Sentences with phrase «of plaintiffs and defendants»

To be clear, local rules like those in the Eastern District violate the rights of both plaintiffs and defendants.

Representation of plaintiffs and defendants in federal district and regional appellate courts in numerous patent infringement and preliminary injunction matters.

Raymond has been retained to act in complex estate, commercial and intellectual property litigation, on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants.

Every legal system balances the interests of plaintiffs and defendants, of society and the individual, of justice and economics.

We take cases on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants (sorry, not at the same time).

Information reported includes the type of case, types of plaintiffs and defendants, trial winners, amount of total damages awarded, amount of punitive damages awarded, and case processing time.

Stephen D. Williger, M.S.S.A. and Frank R. DeSantis have sixty - five years» combined experience trying cases in all forums, on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants, and on an extremely broad set of topics, including:

Katherine Stepp represents a national clientele of plaintiffs and defendants in complex civil litigation matters.

Tom's litigation practice involves all aspects of intellectual property and Tom has litigated cases on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants in federal courts all over the country.

Representation of plaintiffs and defendants in motor vehicle crashes involving wrongful death claims.

On behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants, our IP litigators have handled numerous trials, as well as TRO and preliminary injunction proceedings, involving intellectual property.

He also spends a significant amount of time handling commercial cases on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants.

Dan's business litigation included defending a truck manufacturer in suits by disgruntled dealers, the defense of numerous officers and directors of failed savings and loans, a recovery for limited partners in a franchise who were misled by a franchisor, defense of libel actions, trade secret litigation on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants, lease covenant disputes for commercial tenants of shopping centers, and business partnership disputes.

A versatile lawyer with extensive experience in complex commercial litigation, domestic and international arbitration, insurance coverage and price redetermination proceedings, James Rogers has tried multiple trials and arbitrations in Texas, Florida, Missouri, and California, on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants.

Blois, Nickerson & Bryson LLP acts on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants in a wide range of insurance and personal injury cases.

We have a statewide civil trial practice [in Oregon] focusing on representation of plaintiffs and defendants in complex personal injury claims.

Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the court adjourned the case after consultation with counsels of the plaintiff and the defendant.

We provide high quality scientifically based expert accident reconstruction, collision analyses and expert witness testimony to the litigation community on behalf of plaintiff and defendant litigants throughout California and the United States.

[4] In this case, neither party filed a trial brief and counsel simply submitted a draft consent order that «trial briefs of the plaintiff and defendant be filed outside the times prescribed» by the Rules.

The particular circumstances of the case, which include the relative ages of the plaintiff and defendant, the relationship between the plaintiff and defendant, and the repetitive nature of the abuse, will be considered in relationship to the establishment of the egregiousness of the defendant's conduct and the severity of the plaintiff's resulting emotional distress.

The likeability of the plaintiff and the defendant is a significant factor.

It is the responsibility of the plaintiff and the defendant to serve the subpoena on their witnesses and to offer to pay the witness fee prescribed by law.

Drs. Grover and Pisesky are orthopedic surgeons who did independent medical examinations of Ms. Beaton on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendants respectively.

William Goren «provides great insight on the ADA and provides analysis from the standpoint of the plaintiff and the defendant,» says J. Courtney Cunningham, a Miami lawyer.

«As to the issue of parental alienation the court finds that the actions of the plaintiff and defendant have contributed to the plaintiff's alienation from his minor children.»

Not exact matches

Plaintiff did not reveal any confidential information to Defendant, and did not show Defendant any of its source code, either at this meeting or otherwise.»

Yieldify denies this, countering that «in March 2013, Mr. Jay Radia, Defendant's Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Meelan Radia, Defendant's Chief Technical Officer, met with representatives of Plaintiff.

Plaintiff seeks to recover compensable damages caused by Defendants» violations of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the «Exchange Act») and Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder.

If both sides, through their eyes and their people's eyes, have concluded that the plaintiff is absolutely going to win this case, and the plaintiff is going to get a lot of money because they're totally on board with everything that has been presented, then that might be a good reason for the defendant to agree to a settlement with the plaintiff for less money than the potential exposure if the jury comes back and finds willful infringement.

«To place defendants» argument in a real world context,» she wrote, «they assert that for the payment of approximately $ 100 a year to the Copyright Office (the payment for a Section 111 compulsory license) and without compliance with the strictures of the Communications Act or plaintiffs» consent, that they are entitled to use and profit from the plaintiffs» copyrighted works.»

This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because there is complete diversity of citizenship between Plaintiff and Defendant, and the amount in controversy exceeds $ 75,000, exclusive of costs and interests.

Plaintiff Christopher M. Sulyma, on behalf of two proposed classes of participants in the Intel 401 (k) Savings Plan and the Intel Retirement Contribution Plan, claims that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties by investing a significant portion of the plans» assets in risky and high - cost hedge fund and private equity investments.

On May 3, 2013, the lead plaintiff filed a consolidated complaint alleging that, during that same period, all of the defendants violated Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule

On May 3, 2013, the lead plaintiff filed a consolidated complaint alleging that, during that same period, all of the defendants violated Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b - 5 (b) by concealing material information and making false statements related to Parent's acquisition of Autonomy and that certain defendants violated SEC Rule 10b - 5 (a) and (c) by engaging in a «scheme» to defraud investors.

In Metzler v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc., the plaintiff alleged that the defendant, an operator of vocational colleges, had manipulated student enrollment data, and that plaintiff suffered losses when the company issued a press release showing lower earnings than the false data had suggested.

The Ninth Circuit took a similar approach in Berson v. Applied Signal Technology, Inc., and ultimately fashioned a standard for loss causation in Nuveen v. City of Alameda when it held that a plaintiff can establish loss causation «by showing that the defendant misrepresented or omitted the very facts that were a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's economic loss.»

I was an expert witness for the plaintiff and we were able to show that the anonymous site was in all likelihood linked to another site known to be run by the defendant because of an under - the - hood WordPress config variable he probably wasn't aware existed (X-Pingback-Url FTW).

However, it also opened up the subject of Plaintiff, Defendant, and Judge.

Thus it was in the celebrated case of Rylands v. Fletcher (1868) in the law of tort, in which water from the defendant's reservoir had flooded the mines of the plaintiff and put them out of use.

According to Athenian law, the jury had to choose between the alternatives proposed by the plaintiff and those of the defendant.

The complaint lists four individual plaintiffs and names as defendants Trader Joe's, which sells some of the wines that were tested, and about two dozen California wineries, including some well - known names such as Beringer, Fetzer, and... Continue Reading

Not only was the printed matter on the McIlhenny bottle and carton copied, but defendant adopted a bottle and carton of the same size and shape and strikingly similar to that of plaintiff.

The defendant, in answer, denies that plaintiff or its predecessors now use, or have ever used, the word «Tabasco» as a trade - mark or identifying name for sauce, and specially avers that the word «Tabasco» could not and can not be appropriated as a trade - mark, because it is geographical and descriptive; that plaintiff continually acquiesced in the descriptive use of the word «Tabasco,» and never made a bona fide attempt to establish the trade - mark it now asserts; and that any rights that plaintiff may have had in the name as a trade - mark were lost by the patenting of the process and the expiration of such patent.

It appears from defendant's own statement, that the McIlhenny bottle and carton were used as a guide in the manufacture of his own, and the inference must follow that his intention then was to make it appear to the casual observer that his sauce and that of plaintiff were one and the same, and thus secure the advantage of the extensive advertisement and wide demand for plaintiff's product, which the stipulation shows is sold in every State of the Union and many foreign countries and is handled by a large maj ority of the jobbers in the United States.

Where defendant, manufacturer of a sauce similar to plaintiff's, copied the printed matter on plaintiff's bottle and carton and adopted a bottle and carton of the same size and shape as plaintiff's, he was guilty of unfair competition, although certain differences between the bottles could be discovered when the two were placed side by side.

Defendant Bulliard, concededly, has a perfect right, so far as plaintiff is concerned, to make sauce in accordance with the patent, but he does not pretend to be doing so, and, in fact, since the adoption of the National Prohibition Amendment to the Constitution and the passage of an enforcement statute by Congress, he may not do so, as the patented process provided for a mixture of alcohol as well as vinegar with the pepper pulp.

The fact that defendant has not only dressed his product in imitation of that of the plaintiff, but has, in addition, likewise used plaintiff's trade - mark, gives added reason why the Court should require that hereafter defendant not only discontinue the use of the name «Tabasco,» but that he adopt a new and distinctive bottle and carton, such as will clearly and unmistakably differentiate his sauce from the «Tabasco Pepper Sauce» manufactured by plaintiff.

Not only did defendant adopt the name and imitate the bottles and cartons in use by plaintiff, but at the very beginning, when he started the manufacture and sale of his sauce in competition with the long established business of plaintiff, he printed on his bottle labels a caution to use «only the genuine Evangeline,» thus apparently seeking to create the impression that such «Evangeline» Tabasco Sauce was an old and established brand, against spurious imitations of which the public should be warned.

Such of these other manufacturers, including defendant, whose use of the word «Tabasco» came to the knowledge of plaintiff and its predecessors, have been warned to the effect that they have no right to use the word in connection with the sauce, or to use similar packages, and quite a number of suits for infringement have been filed by plaintiff, most of which have been terminated by consent decrees.

These facts and circumstances lead to the conclusion that defendant's effort was to so imitate the bottling and packaging of plaintiff's sauce as to readily deceive the unobservant consumer, while yet preserving a sufficient distinction between the two.