«The School Breakfast Scorecard: 2000,» an annual report released by the Washington - based Food Research and Action Center, found that more than 71,000 schools offered the subsidized breakfasts and that the average number
of poor children served daily rose to 6.3 million in 2000, almost double the 3.4 million served in 1990.
Not exact matches
World Vision subscribes to the humanitarian principles
of impartiality and neutrality and therefore rejects any involvement in any political, military or terrorist activities and maintains its independence as a humanitarian aid agency committed to
serving the
poor, especially
children.
Obama, like much
of Academia, is divergent from reality and therefore the rube like businessman is the best choice for an economy that will better
serve the
poor and
children of a lesser god.
It
serves well over 100
children, many
of them
poor.
VanHagar wrote on Wdenesday, May 2, 2012 at 7:47 pm, stating, «It was in faith in God that gave us the Salvation Army, Abused
Children «s Fund, Freedom 424 (
serving victims
of s.ex trafficking), Bright Hope International (working with the
poor),
Children «s Christian Lifeline Hunger and Medical Relief, Christian World Relief, Five Talents - USA, Inc., Habitat for Humanity International, Living Water International (providing clean water), etc. etc. and hundreds (if not thousands)
of other faith - based charities help the
poor and disenfranchised.
It was in faith in God that gave us the Salvation Army, Abused
Children «s Fund, Freedom 424 (
serving victims
of s.ex trafficking), Bright Hope International (working with the
poor),
Children «s Christian Lifeline Hunger and Medical Relief, Christian World Relief, Five Talents - USA, Inc., Habitat for Humanity International, Living Water International (providing clean water), etc. etc. and hundreds (if not thousands)
of other faith - based charities help the
poor and disenfranchised.
The witness also spoke
of the order's «ingrained» values, in particular
of serving the
poor, and said: «There is a hugely long tradition around formation around how to behave with dignity and respect around
children.
Another key component
of the legislation would require elementary schools to
serve free breakfast in the classroom in schools with moderate or high concentrations
of poor children.
Beyond the meals themselves, Congress must also address
poor regulation and oversight
of the food
served to our
children.
«It also means that in one
of the
poorest cities in the state,
children are dramatically under -
served.»
In the middle
of the last decade, in urban communities across America, middle - class and upper - middle - class parents started sending their
children to public schools again — schools that for decades had overwhelmingly
served poor and (and overwhelmingly minority) populations.
It's no secret that «regular» schools
serving predominantly
poor children, who face overwhelming challenges that affluent
children never have to confront, have more than their share
of behavior problems.
He is the co-founder
of Educar y Crecer (EyC), an initiative that offers remedial education in math and reading to
children in slums in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and
of Enseñá por Argentina (EpA), an effort to recruit the country's best and brightest college graduates to teach in schools
serving the
poor for at least two years.
Piney Branch Elementary
serves an incredibly diverse group
of 3rd, 4th, and 5th graders, from the
children of übereducated white and black middle - class families, to
poor immigrant
children from Latin America, Ethiopia, and Eritrea, to low - income African American kids.
Community health centers that
serve millions
of poor children are facing shortages of vaccines against common childhood diseases such as measles, mumps, and rubella, a new report by the Children's Defense Fund co
children are facing shortages
of vaccines against common childhood diseases such as measles, mumps, and rubella, a new report by the
Children's Defense Fund co
Children's Defense Fund concludes.
The report said: «In the context
of creating a fairly funded system, government should also consider the external effects that may combine to compound the effects on pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds, including place poverty (living in neighbourhoods with high proportions
of poor children, attending schools
serving higher proportions
of disadvantaged pupils) gender and ethnicity.»
One
of the primary goals
of the Baltimore - based Abell Foundation, where I am a senior policy analyst, is to improve the public schools that
serve poor children.
«In mapping the education journey
of children at schools
serving low income communities or those from
poor families, a school pattern emerges.
A House subcommittee approved a Republican welfare - reform bill last week that would give states most
of the responsibility for administering aid programs
serving millions
of poor children and their families.
«The challenged statutes do not inevitably lead to the assignment
of more inexperienced teachers to schools
serving poor and minority
children,» said Boren, who received his judicial appointments from Republican Govs. George Deukmejian and Pete Wilson.
For generations, Catholic schools educated countless
poor children; chartering was created to allow a wide variety
of non-profit groups to run excellent schools, frequently
serving children in need.
«If we believe that education is the way out
of poverty, then we need to stop making the schools that
serve the
poorer children the most impoverished schools.
«The challenged statutes do not inevitably lead to the assignment
of more inexperienced teachers to schools
serving poor and minority
children,» Presiding Justice Roger Boren said in the 3 - 0 ruling.
This need for cultures that reaffirm the self - worth
of poor and minority
children (and ultimately, allow for them and their communities gain the knowledge needed to determine their own destinies) is why historically black colleges and universities, along with other minority -
serving higher ed institutions, still exist.
Philanthropic foundations that support education causes are interested in
serving as many
poor and minority
children as possible; when 30 % to 40 %
of a student body is made up
of white or affluent students, the school is deemed suspect, as reform - minded foundations see such programs as «wasting» a third
of their seats.
I'd love to see charter associations ask OCR to investigate states that don't do enough to provide equitable funding to charter schools
serving high proportions
of poor and minority
children.
I'd love to see charter associations throughout the country file complaints with OCR, asking it to investigate states that don't do enough to provide equitable funding to charter schools
serving high proportions
of poor and minority
children.
In a push to provide more
children with free tutoring under the No
Child Left Behind Act, the Department
of Education is expanding two pilot programs that allow school districts to offer the extra assistance a year earlier than usual, and to
serve as tutoring providers even if they themselves have been deemed
poor performers.
Under the proposed rules, teacher colleges will be motivated to steer their graduates away from school districts and schools that report low student achievement test scores, i.e., those
serving poor and minority
children and new learners
of English.
The colleges with greater numbers
of graduates who
serve the
poorest children in their state will be punished the most.
These three recent national reports highlight the importance
of and need for additional research on schools that
serve the needs
of poor children by increasing their achievement and, hence, their educational opportunities.
Carrie Tulbert, principal
of Concord Middle School in Cabarrus County and North Carolina's principal
of the year in 2014 - 2015, has intimate experience
serving a school dominated by the
children of poor families.
Some
of the biggest axes would fall on a $ 2.3 billion program for teacher training and class - size reduction, and a $ 1.2 billion after - school program, which
serves nearly 2 million
children, many
of them
poor.
Gone, for example, would be $ 1.2 billion for after school programs that
serve 1.6 million
children, most
of whom are
poor, and $ 2.1 billion for teacher training and class - size reduction.
The Sutton Trust report, Background to Success, said: «In the context
of creating a fairly funded system, government should also consider the external effects that may combine to compound the effects on pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds, including place poverty (living in neighbourhoods with high proportions
of poor children, attending schools
serving higher proportions
of disadvantaged pupils) gender and ethnicity.»
Just because kids are
poor, doesn't mean they aren't smart and these brightest
children are bored out
of their minds by the non-stop test prep that
serves «data - driven instruction» but fails to actually teach smart kids anything.
As Dropout Nation has pointed out ad nauseam since the administration unveiled the No
Child waiver gambit two years ago, the plan to let states to focus on just the worst five percent
of schools (along with another 10 percent or more
of schools with wide achievement gaps) effectively allowed districts not under watch (including suburban districts whose failures in
serving poor and minority kids was exposed by No
Child) off the hook for
serving up mediocre instruction and curricula.
In the Clifton - Fine school district, only 25 %
of the
children are
poor, but 100 %
of their 4 year olds are
served in the public schools.
TFA, suitably representative
of the liberal education reform more generally, underwrites, intentionally or not, the conservative assumptions
of the education reform movement: that teacher's unions
serve as barriers to quality education; that testing is the best way to assess quality education; that educating
poor children is best done by institutionalizing them; that meritocracy is an end - in - itself; that social class is an unimportant variable in education reform; that education policy is best made by evading politics proper; and that faith in public school teachers is misplaced.
The rules requiring waiver states to submit plans for providing
poor and minority
children with high - quality teachers was unworkable because it doesn't address the supply problem at the heart
of the teacher quality issues facing American public education; the fact that state education departments would have to battle with teachers» union affiliates, suburban districts, and the middle - class white families those districts
serve made the entire concept a non-starter.
The National Coalition for Public Education — which includes 50 organizations, including the
Children's Defense Fund and the National Urban League — has also written that portability would expand the amount
of students
served through Title I and result in the
poorest districts getting less
of overall Title I dollars.
Finally, Dr. Jeff Duncan - Andrade, professor
of Raza Studies at San Francisco State University and a high school teacher in East Oakland, California, closed the day with a moving talk on critical pedagogy in urban settings in which he shared his own experiences and strategies for effective teaching in schools
serving poor and working - class
children.
Most urban Catholic schools were originally built to educate the
children of European immigrants; today, they mostly
serve poor African American and Latino students.
At Taylor, which
serves a prekindergarten through eighth - grade population
of mostly low - income African - American students, educators are celebrating victories in improving attendance (it rose to 94.5 percent among
poor children last year from 93.6 percent in 2008) and reducing asthma.
But we still
serve only a fraction
of the
poor children eligible to enroll because that is not enough money to pay enough people to
serve all
of the
children living in poverty in America.
Even the Advantage school in Rocky Mount, N.C., that Mayor Schundler says is so well equipped to
serve Jersey City's
poor, is skimming; 38 percent
of its
children qualify for free lunches versus 49 percent for Rocky Mount elementary schools.
«It will be very difficult for Democrats to make the case that they are on the side
of civil rights and social justice if they are defending unconstitutional laws that objectively harm
poor kids and
children of color,» said Austin, who
serves on the board
of Students Matter, the organization that brought the lawsuit.
Sir Michael Wilshaw says England's
poorest children are especially badly
served, as only a third reach a good level
of development in pre-schools.
The result is a near wholesale abandonment
of the public schools, especially those that
serve poor children.
Due to the requirement under the federal No
Child Left Behind Act that each state's Title I plan must describe «the specific steps that the state education agency will take to ensure that
poor and minority
children are not taught at higher rates than other
children by inexperienced, unqualified, or out -
of - field teachers and the measures that the state education agency will use to evaluate and publicly report the progress,» TEA formed a stakeholder group, upon which TCTA
served, to develop its State Educator Equity Plan.