Not exact matches
«By failing to adequately limit
population growth, reassess the role
of an economy rooted in
growth, reduce greenhouse gases, incentivize renewable energy, protect habitat, restore ecosystems, curb pollution, halt defaunation, and constrain invasive alien species, humanity is not
taking the urgent steps needed to safeguard our imperiled biosphere.»
If you
take 2 percent, we have a half - a-percent
population growth, and we have a little immigration, but 2 percent in one generation will add $ 19,000
of GDP per person, family
of four, $ 76,000 in one generation.
When Baby Boomers
took the reins
of growth in the 1980s, only 12 %
of the
population was older than 65.
(1) employment
growth, sourced from the Bureau
of Labor Statistics Economic Summaries in August 2016, with the percentage representing the employment change from June 2015 to June 2016 in each city; (2)
population growth, based on and sourced from the 2014 and 2015 Census, with the percentage representing the change in
population from 2014 to 2015; (3) increase in home values, based on Zillow Home Value, with the percentage representing the change in median home values for single - family homes from June 2015 to June 2016, sourced August 2016; (4) years to pay off property, which was based using the median home value for July 2016 and the median rent for a single - family residence for July 2016, both sourced from Zillow; median rent was multiplied by 12 to obtain yearly rent and then home value was divided by yearly rent to determine how many years it would
take for the home to be paid off from rental income using current home values and rent prices for each city.
population explosion is the root
of all poverty and famin...
Take a look at China, African continent, India, Paki ect... two children max to replace you and your spouse... Zero
population growth is optimal.
Much
of the
population growth will
take place among the 80 percent
of Earth's peoples who currently consume only 20 percent
of Earth's resources.
Advertisement Statistics project the bulk
of the world's
population growth will
take place in Africa by 2050.
The new study builds on this earlier research, extending the projections globally using a variety
of climate models and
taking into account future
population growth.
The researchers found that at lower densities, the
populations took longer to return to previous levels after being shocked with a dose
of salt — which can harm or kill yeast — in their
growth medium.
As
population densities
of hunter - gatherers slowly rose at the end
of the ice ages, bands had to choose between feeding more mouths by
taking the first steps toward agriculture, or else finding ways to limit
growth.
While it was beyond the scope
of this report, analysis
of population growth also
takes into account how rapid urbanization would change the face
of human settlements and affect their ability to adapt to climate change.
LINDAU, Germany — A 93 - year - old Nobel laureate in physiology or medicine received a standing ovation from hundreds
of scientists on June 30 at the end
of a speech in which he urged the world's young people to
take measures to control runaway
population growth in order to resolve related ills that have resulted from humans» remarkable evolutionary success as a species.
It is used to treat Adult
Growth Hormone Disorder (AGHD), a real medical condition that is affecting over 50 %
of today's American
population, and a physician's prescription is required to
take HGH.
Along this thinking it is probable to miss out on
taking note
of the consequences, if a segment
of the
population is marginalised or excluded from the benefits
of such
growth.
In making our estimates, we
take into account differences between countries in their level
of income, the average number
of years students are in school, and
population growth rates.
Up from just 0.5 percent in 1987 (see Figure 1), this reflects an increase
of more than 300 percent in the number
of students
taking the SAT with accommodations, compared with overall
growth in the test -
taking population of only 18 percent.
In schools and districts that
take on a wide variety
of roles and serve diverse student
populations, more focus should be put on measures that impact individual student
growth and their ability to access the curriculum.
Shame on us for thinking that somehow we need to eliminate their
population growth because we just so shamelessly feel entitled to
take lives
of animals and torture them.
This year's FotoFest biennial
takes on the interconnected issues
of climate change;
population growth and migration; globalized use
of natural resources and capital; and the impact
of new technologies.
The issue is that modern agricultural - industrial civilization is the thing that is
taking away the choices
of the people carrying water and gathering fuel, by enabling huge
population growth while simultaneously sapping resources worldwide.
* The role
of the US in global efforts to address pollutants that are broadly dispersed across national borders, such as greenhouse gasses, persistent organic pollutants, ozone, etc...; * How they view a president's ability to influence national science policy in a way that will persist beyond their term (s), as would be necessary for example to address global climate change or enhancement
of science education nationwide; * Their perspective on the relative roles that scientific knowledge, ethics, economics, and faith should play in resolving debates over embryonic stem cell research, evolution education, human
population growth, etc... * What specific steps they would
take to prevent the introduction
of political or economic bias in the dissemination and use
of scientific knowledge; * (and many more...)
This would at least slow the rate
of population growth until the baby - boomers die off (sorry mom) and a minor reduction would begin (this may
take a while since the boomers intend to subsist in cybernetic retirement hives until the 22nd century).
Deep ecology, which called for
population reduction, soft technology and non-interference in the natural world, was eagerly
taken up by environmentalists impatient with shallow ecology — another
of Mr. Naess's coinages — which did not confront technology and economic
growth.
The counter arguments that the demographic transition will
take care
of population size
growth and that we can technologize and public manage our way through environmental limits are probably valid.
I asked Rob a question posed in comments here a couple
of months ago by Steven Earl Salmony, a psychologist who is an impassioned champion
of reining in
population growth: Does the concept
of the demographic transition, which
takes societies from high birth and death rates in deep poverty to aging and stable
populations as they advance, have the weight
of scientific theory or is it far less established?
The dynamics
of growth (
population and consumption) are rather amazing and make me wonder, sometimes, how many people have actually
taken mathematics and thought about the implications.
The world's annual net
population growth of 73 million will easily overtake any climate change mitigation action we might
take.
They add, grimly, that things could also get worse: «It should also be noted that the projections do not
take into account potential negative feedback from the environmental consequences
of rapid
population growth.
If
population and GDP
growth continue as usual, a lot people will be
taking their Bics to chunks
of coal, etc. in the next few decades.
«[b] y failing to adequately limit
population growth, reassess the role
of an economy rooted in
growth, reduce greenhouse gases, incentivize renewable energy, protect habitat, restore ecosystems, curb pollution, halt defaunation, and constrain invasive alien species, humanity is not
taking the urgent steps needed to safeguard our imperilled biosphere.»
Much
of this
growth is
taking place in Africa, where governments and leaders are talking and acting in relation to
population.
I have
taken the expected sharp drop in
population growth into account and have estimated that the per capita use
of fossil fuels would continue to increase, reaching a 30 % higher level by 2100 compared to today (it grew by 20 % over the past 40 years).
I have simply pointed out a) that your «extrapolation»
of human - induced CO2 increase does not
take into account expected future trends in human
population growth, and b) that your 2100 level
of 1000 ppm exceeds CO2 increase that would occur from consuming all the optimistically estimated fossil fuel resources remaining on our planet.
«Central to the issues we are going to have to deal with are: patterns
of production and consumption in the industrial world that are undermining the Earth's life - support systems; the explosive increase in
population, largely in the developing world, that is adding a quarter
of a million people daily; deepening disparities between rich and poor that leave 75 per cent
of humanity struggling to live; and an economic system that
takes no account
of ecological costs or damage — one which views unfettered
growth as progress.
Integrated assessment models (IAMs)
take underlying socioeconomic factors, such as
population and economic
growth, as well as a climate target — such as limiting warming to 1.5 C — and estimate what changes could happen to energy production, use, and emissions in different regions
of the world to reach the targets in the most cost - effective way.
51 Fig. 20 - 14, p. 481 Cut fossil fuel use (especially coal) Shift from coal to natural gas Improve energy efficiency Shift to renewable energy resources Transfer energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies to developing countries Reduce deforestation Use more sustainable agriculture and forestry Limit urban sprawl Reduce poverty Slow
population growth Remove CO 2 from smoke stack and vehicle emissions Store (sequester) CO2 by planting trees Sequester CO 2 deep underground Sequester CO 2 in soil by using no - till cultivation and
taking cropland out
of production Sequester CO 2 in the deep ocean Repair leaky natural gas pipelines and facilities Use animal feeds that reduce CH 4 emissions by belching cows Solutions Global Warming PreventionCleanup
Let's
take a «middle
of the pack» IPCC SRES model - based «scenario and storyline» representing «business as usual» with very rapid economic
growth, human
population continuing to grow but at a slower rate, leveling off at a
population of around 10.5 billion by the end
of the century and no «climate initiatives»
This compounds to an order
of magnitude
growth in
population since 1700, which further compounds to more than two orders
of magnitude
of atmospheric loading from byproducts
of energy consumption when
taking into account that per capita energy consumption increased by more than an order
of magnitude over those three centuries.
Next Greenblatt
took official state projections
of growth in
population and gross state product, the two main drivers for the expected increase in greenhouse gas emissions.
The models the research team used
took into consideration various climate data, land use, soil samples, the
growth of different crops, irrigation systems,
population densities and industries.
Jessica Piekielek, who teaches sociology and anthropology at Southern Oregon University, has
taken advantage
of the calculator in her Introduction to Cultural Anthropology class to talk about global
population growth, development, and social inequality.
Jacques Cousteau, conservationist (lived 1910 — 1997) «We must alert and organise the world's people to pressure world leaders to
take specific steps to solve the two root causes
of our environmental crises — exploding
population growth and wasteful consumption
of irreplaceable resources.
As a member
of the Club
of Rome (COR) Strong
took their neo-Malthusian view set out in their report Limits to
Growth that Wikipedia defines as, «a 1972 report on the computer simulation of exponential economic and population growth with a finite supply of resources,» and translated it into organization and bureau
Growth that Wikipedia defines as, «a 1972 report on the computer simulation
of exponential economic and
population growth with a finite supply of resources,» and translated it into organization and bureau
growth with a finite supply
of resources,» and translated it into organization and bureaucracy.
Thus investments in new technologies during the coming decades might have the same order
of influence on future emissions as
population growth, economic development and levels
of energy consumption
taken together.
Meanwhile, the UN human settlements programme estimates that nearly 70 per cent
of the world's
population will live in urban areas by 2050, with most
of the
growth expected to
take place in Asia.
All
of the
growth in
population is
taking place in countries least able to supply the resources necessary for minimum standards
of living.
Taking the pace
of change in science, technology,
population growth, commerce and finance from around 1830 as the pivotal time, nothing that religion could offer has been able to match the complexity
of human need and its reliance upon laws.
If you will pardon a bit
of facetiousness, if the trend
of five times
population growth continues, in the future, every lawyer will have one client each and the lawyer's income will depend on the income
of the client,
of which the lawyer will
take half.
This
growth takes into account the increase
of the aging
population spread across the state.
At the very least, in allocating spending on Indigenous economic policy there is a need to
take into account the fact
of relatively high
population growth...