Sentences with phrase «of powerful questions»

The client is considered the expert and the coach engages you in a journey of powerful questions to facilitate your developing your own answers, strategies and plans.

It uses a series of powerful questions to help the individual zero in on their strengths, their niche areas of focus, and the plan that is going to work best for them.

Never underestimate the impact of powerful questions.

Not exact matches

All of which is both interesting and useful, but it begs the question: Why is simply paying attention to the good things in your life so powerful?

You've described the benefits of your solution, you've used the most powerful question in sales to discover how it will solve their specific problems, and perhaps even crafted a compelling ROI analysis.

Recently, the use of NDAs has been called into question as a tool that powerful men and institutions use to silence victims.

There are extremely powerful tools that can help knowledge workers find insightful perspectives and answer a whole host of questions they might have about their area of business using natural language, just like using a search engine, but far more meaningful.

Powerful questions infuse a sense of possibility and cause the mind to consider new options, thus expanding the mental boundaries posed by previous paradigms.

When a second group of participants listened to the recorded negotiation passages, and asked questions about how powerful they perceived the speakers to be, they were able to identify who was high - versus low - rank.

SAN JOSE, Calif. — Mark Zuckerberg may have laughed off questions that Facebook is too powerful when he appeared in front of Congress last month.

«I've read the most powerful books on the Law of Attraction... but I still had some questions unanswered.

And there are also questions of whether this increasingly complex and fragmented market makes it easier for high - frequency traders to use their sophisticated algorithms and powerful computers to take advantage of average investors.

In my experience, working with sales and marketing to identify and agree on the questions that constitute each stage (or sub-stage) of the buying process can be a powerful aligning force, getting everyone to realize that buying is a buyer - driven process, and to agree that there are things that need to happen before you can expect to close the sale, today, regardless of where the buyer is in the process.

They were humble enough to accept feedback and ask powerful questions that set themselves on a trajectory of «right.»

An equally unprecedented wave of complex risks, from climate change to cyber threats, calls into question the value of citizenship in even the most powerful economies in the world.

If any of the questions above catches your interest; then read on as I share with you 10 simple but powerful customer retention strategies that will keep your customers happy and loyal.

Awesome Interview... Powerful Questions to Extract some Real Life Truthful Success Wisdom to Show Entrepreneurs from all walks of Life to Achieve their Goals and Beyond!!!! Absolutely Phenomenal Interview!!

Suzanne Fogel, Chair of the Marketing Department at DePaul University's Driehaus College of Business, questions how powerful money - driven incentives are for this younger generation.

Ars Technica questioned some of the promotional material on Boeing's «Watch US Fly» website, including claims that the company's most powerful SLS rocket will be available soon, despite that it's likely at least two years away from a first flight.

Those put into question your belief in the characteristics of the god, perhaps even the existence of the god itself, but it is still more comforting to assume something more powerful than yourself has your best interests in mind vs. the idea that we are left to our own devices — especially when you are surrounded by people that agree with and reinforce that idea and shun you when you do not agree with it.

Answering tough questions isn't easy, but failing to answer powerful questions is an exercise in procrastination simply because a symptom is the early sign of an ailment.

Pastor Brendle's claptrap isn't being swallowed whole hog and there is legitimate questioning about why an all merciful and all powerful being that Brendle is apologizing for would either be unwilling or unable to protect the lives of innocents from the monsters He created.

That two of the most prominent Catholic institutions would lay prostrate before the nation's most powerful supporter of abortion and infanticide indicates just how far the Roman Catholic Church has declined, and answers the question why so many have left the church and moved on to the Orthodox, Fundamentalists, and related denominations.

Typically this process leads to a characterization of God as a being so advanced, powerful, immortal, and not subject to the laws of time, matter, and space that his followers can make up any excuse they choose to address questions, since nothing about their god (or gods) can be subjected to any kind of objective verification or scrutiny, just like everything else in the religion.

The powerful message of this experiment centers around this question: What would happen if you got to know the person first before the issue?

There was a powerful through - line of sacrifice, and an open question of whether a necessary evil is ever acceptable.

Even to raise the question of the morality of this gravest of injustices is enough to incur the anger and condemnation of powerful sections of our society.

Therefore the question arises: How are we to move forward to a fresh synthesis of God as Powerful Love that builds on the criticisms of Augustinian theism that we have observed?

Dr. Polk reconceives the basic question of the relation of power and goodness by asking what kind of power is appropriate to a loving God, rather than the traditional way of framing the issue as how can a powerful God also be a loving God.

here is a question for you to ponder; if god is so powerful that he thought the universe into exsistance, why does he need to cause natural events just to deal with a few medelsome humans; why not just blink those he doesn't like out of exsistance?

Paul's question to the Roman believers was also a powerful statement: «Don't you know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death?»

You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there)

You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there) but you also are saying to speak with him on a daily basis.

The redefinition of omnipotence and omniscience provide the groundwork for process thought's unique treatment of theodicy, the question of how the concept of an all powerful yet loving God can be reconciled with the existence of evil in the world.

My question boils down to: Why would a perfect all loving, all powerful, all knowing god CREATE the VERY ESSENCE of evil, and would that not indicate that god is evil in nature?

In the meantime, Wood appears to be sanguine that if the leading question of theological inquiry is kept explicitly in view, it is powerful enough not only to subsume the leading interest of each of the relevant academic disciplines but also to resist distortions that the institutionalization of the academic disciplines might tend to impose on theology.

I'm guessing that the right question is whatever question you are told to ask for, anything else is beyond the capability of an all powerful being.

Fueled by this suspicion, it questions the legitimacy of the powerful as knowers and their right to decide who is and is not «one of them.»

It is precisely the question of how love is powerful in God, in contrast to traditional understandings of the nature of divine power, that continues to whet the theological appetite.

By that time the powerful Barthian proclamation was turning the energies of the theologians away from the question, empirically, historically, and philosophically formulated, as to the uniqueness and finality of Christianity.

A: The question of whether God is all - powerful usually refers to God's power to control events here on earth.

The questions about religion and public life, those calling for «public» discussion, no longer focus on the verifiability of religious speech but concern quite other issues: methods of understanding and describing the religious realities, old and new, that we see appearing around us; useful criteria for assessing these religions and for defining and comprehending this new set of powers in our public life; and ways of protecting vital religious groups from the excesses of the public reaction to them, and protecting the public from the excesses of powerful religious groups — hardly questions a secular culture had thought it would have to take seriously!

Beneath such discrete polity debates lies the question of the readiness of the powerful to pay for civilization.

The renaissance of Islamic culture and politics, the rebirth of Shinto in Japan, the appearance of powerful Jewish, Hindu and Christian «fundamentalisms» in Israel, India and the U.S. — all these have raised important questions about the allegedly ineluctable process of secularization.

But the power and persistence of evil in frustrating the promised goodness of life raises questions as to whether God can be called perfectly powerful in any traditional sense.

The most important question is this: Is the work of art expressive of a powerful view of life and, regardless of subject matter, does it stir some religious sensitivity in the viewer?

He does not delve into the nagging question of how fragile and vulnerable love is powerful over against the forces of domination, but he sets us firmly on the right track.

And spectacles like last night's three - hour test of human willpower only underscore a big problem: Traditional news outlets have made presidential debates — arguably our country's most important televised forum and exchange of ideas — into mind - numbingly boring talk - a-thons, where a bunch of rich, powerful people needle each other for hours about past career decisions while dodging any question of substance.

The question of how an all - powerful, all - knowing and all - loving God could allow suffering has dogged philosophers and theologians for centuries.

Yet if Palmer is correct, as I think he is, in taking objectivism to be the epistemology that informs the practices of the modern university, and if I am correct in suggesting that James and others had already fashioned powerful alternative theories of knowledge as early as 1880, a vital historical question arises.