I have confidence that there is goodwill in the community to see this type
of practical reconciliation accomplished.
On the other hand is the idea
of practical reconciliation where we are reconciled by action alone.
The impoverished notion
of practical reconciliation will not in and of itself lead to meaningful reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples.
A focus on outcomes that can benefit Indigenous people is a hallmark of the current federal government's approach to Indigenous affairs and is consistent with its philosophy
of practical reconciliation.
There are some clear contrasts between the limiting framework
of practical reconciliation and the more focused and accountable approach based on international guidance and standards.
The «assimilationist» goals
of practical reconciliation, which seek to «maintain rather than transform the relationship of Indigenous people to the mainstream society»; and
The absence of an absolute commitment to overcoming such disadvantage - with short, medium and long term targets - masks the distinct lack of progress within the framework
of practical reconciliation,» said Dr Jonas.
Not exact matches
It would be difficult to find a better summation
of what
practical reconciliation is.
In nursing homes, both registered nurses (RNs) and licensed
practical nurses (LPNs) perform medication
reconciliation, a safety practice during which health care professionals review patients» medications to reduce the likelihood
of preventable adverse drug events.
listen to this podcast episode I recorded with my friend Monique Melton... we spent a good portion
of the episode talking about racial
reconciliation and what that looks like... Monique also shared some very
practical ways that we can work towards racial
reconciliation and
practical steps we can take in our families and our communities.
Mission to provide
practical Bible teaching and equip Christians to be ministers
of reconciliation.
Mission to provide
practical Bible teaching and equip Christians to be ministers
of reconciliation.
As a
practical aside, this latter obligation will require
reconciliation with the fact than many employers have internal policies that prohibit disclosing details
of the corrective action the employer has chosen following such investigations.
Significantly the Budget does not provide any increase in the government's existing allocation
of $ 11 million funding for Indigenous - specific family violence projects over a four - year period, despite the intense media attention given to this subject over the past year and the government's use
of this issue to reinforce its call for a
practical reconciliation.
In one
of the most significant speeches
of his prime ministership, John Howard yesterday laid out a
practical program for
reconciliation between Aborigines and other Australians.
The rationale
of compensation reflects international law norms and human rights principles, and is both a symbolic and
practical act
of reconciliation.
Again, the absence
of a long term commitment to overcoming Indigenous disadvantage, with short, medium and long term targets, masks the distinct lack
of progress in addressing Indigenous disadvantage within a
practical reconciliation approach.
COAG endorses a National framework
of principles for government service delivery to Indigenous Australians as well as confirming its commitment to the whole
of government trials and
practical reconciliation.
The government has emphasised time and again that the key focus
of reconciliation should be on
practical and effective measures that address the legacy
of profound economic and social disadvantage.
The overarching concern however is that if constructed and too narrowly focused on
practical reconciliation, to the exclusion
of other important factors it could be co-opted as a political tool for reinforcing and legitimizing what is ultimately a limited approach to Indigenous issues... As a result, the framework as a stand alone mechanism has the potential to reinforce
practical reconciliation and marginalize further other issues
of significance to Indigenous peoples.
The limited, reductive framework for «
practical reconciliation» excludes consideration
of a range
of important human rights factors in setting policy.
While the new arrangements involve significant and radical change to the processes
of government, they remain entirely consistent with the Government's «
practical reconciliation» approach.
The report highlights the differences between self - determination and self - empowerment;
practical reconciliation and progressive realization and a rights framework for addressing Indigenous disadvantage; and by considering international developments in the recognition
of Indigenous rights.
It is entirely reasonable to ask whether it is adequate that at the end
of a sustained ten year process
of reconciliation the government has failed to provide a national response and detailed plan
of action for implementation
of the recommendations
of the Council for Aboriginal
Reconciliation and has instead dismissed them as being
of largely symbolic rather than
practical application.
Consequently, an approach such as «
practical reconciliation», that does not extend past the realisation
of measures that allow for citizenship participation in society, is deficient.
The 2000 budget paper on Indigenous policy notes the «record amount
of $ 2.3 billion... allocated to targeted Indigenous - specific programmes» and that «as part
of its commitment to
practical reconciliation between indigenous and non-indigenous Australians, the Commonwealth government is determined to ensure improved access for indigenous Australians to key government programmes and services».
This focus, and its expression through the catchcry
of «
practical reconciliation», is discussed below.
Yet what «
practical reconciliation» also does is to conceive
of these four priority areas as the «real issues», with other concerns such as recognition
of rights to land and culture, and self - determination being «symbolic» and not
of practical benefit.
What these concerns indicate is that despite the rhetoric
of «
practical reconciliation» it is difficult to see that redressing Indigenous disadvantage has been elevated to a sufficient level
of priority, through the establishment
of clear commitments and timeframes to do all that is necessary to achieve reductions in the level
of disadvantage faced by Indigenous people.
[66] Talk
of «
practical reconciliation» asserts moral authority to shut down debate about the importance
of proceeding to address disadvantage on the basis
of rights by presenting them as something that are merely desirable or aspirational, but not connected to the real issues at hand.
As a consequence it is often argued that
reconciliation must provide «unity» and confirm the «sameness»
of all Australians; that it must not be «divisive» by providing «additional» benefits to Indigenous people; and that it should focus on «
practical» measures and outcomes.
«
Practical reconciliation» emphasises the importance
of addressing Indigenous disadvantage in key areas
of health, housing, employment and education.
Mission to provide
practical Bible teaching and equip Christians to be ministers
of reconciliation.
Efforts to «close the gap» and boost Indigenous employment — which have been the focus
of the «
practical reconciliation» approach — have been undermined by our failure as a nation to address the truth and justice elements
of the
reconciliation process.
The proposed changes to CDEP constitute part
of DEWR's broader policy platform, the Indigenous Employment Policy, which reflects the government's commitment to
practical reconciliation measures.
Modelled after the Family Bridges program in Texas, this form
of «
reconciliation therapy» differs from traditional therapy by offering a directive intervention, founded on accountability and with measured milestones and
practical suggestions, using a psycho - educational approach as opposed to therapy.
The current emphasis on «
practical reconciliation» means that it is even more important to assess and evaluate in - put and out - put indicators in terms
of human rights principles.
The discussion
of governance matters proved quite difficult, possibly reflecting the relative lack attention that has been given to such matters in developing the Draft framework for reporting on Indigenous disadvantage in a climate
of «
practical reconciliation».
Perhaps reflecting an emphasis on «
practical reconciliation», the Draft framework consequently fails to develop a series
of indicators
of Indigenous socio - economic disadvantage within a rights framework.
Under the rubric
of «
practical reconciliation» emphasized by the Government, the acknowledgment sought by Indigenous people
of rights, such as self - determination and distinct cultural rights, has been portrayed as being more concerned with symbolism than
practical improvements in real life outcomes.
In questioning the policy
of «
practical reconciliation», John Borrows proffers the alternative
of «
practical recolonisation», whereby Indigenous Australians would reclaim the land and political power wrested from them through colonisation.
Whilst community support for
reconciliation remains high, the federal Government's support for «
practical reconciliation» — with its primary focus on overcoming Indigenous disadvantage — has meant that important questions about the rights
of Indigenous Australians have been left unanswered.