The journal is not merely obscure, but is published by SCIRP, a long - time entry on Jeff Beall's list
of predatory publishers.
«This will pull the carpet from under the feet
of predatory publishers,» Vijayraghavan says.
Not exact matches
The journal's
publisher once graced Jeffrey Beall's now - defunct list
of predatory journals, which extract high fees from would - be authors and publish their work without proper peer review.
In 2013, a Science investigation traced the
publishers and editors
of scores
of predatory journals to India.
By agreeing to these more stringent guidelines, the authors write,
publishers and journals would have the chance to legitimize and advertise the relative quality
of their peer review process in an age when
predatory journals, which falsely claim to use peer review, continue to proliferate.
Jeffrey Beall, a librarian at the University
of Colorado, Denver, offers a comprehensive list
of potentially
predatory scholarly open - access
publishers, as Redfield points out.
Our results concerning the regional distribution
of authorship can be compared with the results
of Xia et al. [18] who studied the authorship distribution for seven pharmaceutical
predatory journals, and Ezinwa Nwagwu and Ojemeni [19] who studied 34 journals from two Nigerian - based
predatory publishers.
If Amazon could compel
publishers to fall in line with its
predatory pricing
of e-books, it could eliminate a thinly capitalized but potent (because
of its physical, brick - and - mortar presence) competitor from the e-book market.
Likely the most compelling case
of predatory pricing for
publishers is in your local libraries e-book collection.
The reason why these companies went out
of business is because
of predatory pricing from the major
publishers.
Dear Michael, if the traditional
publishers priced their ebooks at $ 1.99, you'd label that «
predatory pricing», too, for eating into the sales
of grandma's self - pubbed e-book about her pet Chihuahua.
Thought by many in the industry to be one
of the most misguided corporate public - relations moves a major
publisher has made in recent years, the acquisition has infuriated many in the author ranks who for years have seen Author Solutions as
predatory.
And
publishers would have no choice but to agree because every other competitor would also have been driven out
of the market by Amazon's
predatory pricing?
In the Special Events hall
of today's IDPF Digital Book event, a last minute guest speaker, Paul Aiken from the Author's Guild, gave a ten - minute one - sided explanation
of the DoJ investigation against Apple and five
publishers but he somehow managed to insert the phrase, «Amazon's
predatory pricing model,» three times, despite the fact that Amazon is not named in the investigation or lawsuits.
Agency pricing, in which
publishers set prices and booksellers take a fixed commission, promised to make it easier for small booksellers to compete by removing the threat
of predatory pricing by retailing behemoths like Amazon.
And along with the good info, there's plenty
of bad — especially from
predatory vanity
publishers and bogus agents.
They cleaned up the
predatory practices, the massive overcharging, and the questionable marketing, and turned it into Createspace — a legitimate POD company used by LOTS
of self -
publishers.
i still don't equate the possible banding together
of e-book
publishers to fight a
predatory entity bent on control
If it is, in fact, trying to drive consumer prices down (and accept short - term losses) in order to be the only (or major) supplier
of books to consumers and / or reseller
of books from
publishers, this can be viewed as
predatory pricing — perhaps good for the consumer in the very short run, but less so in the long run, since there are significant fixed costs to establishing a similar e - book / bricks & mortar presence in the market, particularly in the light
of Amazon's potential willingness to drop prices enough to make business untenable for the new entrant.
Check out this warning (one
of many sites with good info on this scam) about Author Solutions, a
predatory vanity / scam
publisher now owned by Penguin.
This is a warning to new authors who want to be published: beware the
predatory publishers like Penguin and save thousands
of dollars.
Loot boxes, microtransactions, season passes, DLC bundles, subscriptions and «games are a service» are all ways in which
publishers can further guard against a flop which, when used in a successful game can feel
predatory but can rescue a studio in times
of adversity; a good example
of this is Rainbow Six: Siege which has gone on to be very successful thanks to continued support through DLC, despite a sluggish start.
Last year was a troublesome year, as the
publisher faced criticism over the
predatory loot boxes found in Star Wars Battlefront 2, Need for Speed - Payback saturated with microtransactions, the closure
of Visceral Games, and Mass Effect Andromeda's buggy release.
Still, I felt it necessary to do my part, and I've held true to my declaration that I wouldn't enable this kind
of predatory BS in my gaming, so in a message to
publishers out there who still think this is going to be okay: